- Sam Raimi Wants to 'Get Back to the Basics' on Spider-Man 4 (111 Comments)
- Must Watch: Teaser Trailer for A Nightmare on Elm Street! (109 Comments)
- Must Watch: Intense Trailer for Mel Gibson's Edge of Darkness (81 Comments)
- Must Watch: Second Official Trailer for Lee Daniels' Precious (78 Comments)
- Check These Out: High Res New Na'vi Photos from Avatar! (77 Comments)
- Paul Blart Director Steve Carr Hired for the Short Circuit Remake (Oct 27, 2009)
- Hitman's Xavier Gens Set to Direct Action Thriller 'The Fallout' (Oct 27, 2009)
- Bruckheimer & Straczynski Adapting 2K's Shattered Union (Oct 27, 2009)
- Steve Carell on Par for Rick Reilly Golf Comedy 'Missing Links' (Oct 26, 2009)
- Jason Reitman Calls Edgar Wright's Scott Pilgrim 'Matrix for Love' (Oct 26, 2009)
- Matt Damon & Josh Brolin Joining the Coen Brothers' True Grit (Oct 26, 2009)
- Ricky Gervais to Host the 67th Annual Golden Globe Awards (Oct 26, 2009)
- Woody Allen's New Film Titled 'You Will Meet A Tall Dark Stranger' (Oct 26, 2009)
| Inglourious Basterds | 10/10 |
| It Might Get Loud | 9/10 |
| Inglourious Basterds | 8.5/10 |
| Star Trek | 9/10 |
| Monsters vs Aliens | 5/10 |
Disappointment Doesn't Even Begin to Cover Shrek the Third
May 17, 2007
by Dave Minkus
- US Release Date: May 17, 2007
- Genre: Animated, Fantasy, Comedy, Family
- MPAA: Rated PG (for some crude humor, suggestive content and action)
- Running Time: 93 minutes
- Directed by: Chris Miller / Raman Hui
- Shrek the Third on IMDb









3/10
First things first, if you haven't seen the trailer for Shrek the Third yet, add a full half point to my rating. For everyone else (and considering that most people who read this site probably have seen the trailer, it should be the majority), the rating stands and congratulations! You've just seen at least a portion of 95% of the jokes that appear in Shrek the Third!
I know that people talk about a convoluted plot in movies these days, and on a very high level, the third installment of the Shrek series has a well-established storyline. Prince Charming (Rupert Everett) is back and this time he's bringing along all the fairy tale villains and they are going to make their own happily-ever-after, even if it means killing people and locking up everyone standing in their way. Meanwhile, Shrek (Mike Myers) is off with Donkey (Eddie Murphy) and Puss (Antonio Banderas) looking for the heir to the throne. From there, it seems that the writers just sat around bouncing ideas off each other to see what they could add as jokes. "High school jokes are funny! They'd even be funnier with an ogre!" "Let's take one of the most powerful characters in all of mythology and reduce him to a touchy-feely hippie because of a nervous breakdown!" "Let's make a couple characters change bodies! We don't actually have to do anything with it. It'll just be funny to have the actors' voices coming out of another character!" No really, it's that bad.

Let's get the good out of the way before I have to put on the rubber gloves to start performing the autopsy on this corpse of a film. Dreamworks Animation took what were fairly dull character models and sharpened some of them considerably. I really noticed the amount of detail that was added to Prince Charming, and the character really does look good. Everyone else and the backgrounds were pretty much sharpened up and that was about it. It also has to be mentioned that for some inexplicable reason, the animators decided that King Arthur (Justin Timberlake), known as Artie in the movie, should look like Daniel Radcliffe from Harry Potter.
The voice talent wasn't bad and got the job done. I do think it's a shame that former Monty Python actors keep lending their voices to such crap considering how visionary their past work is, but people gotta work. Eric Idle was perfectly fine in his role as Merlin, but anybody could have done any of these roles.
I know that it's cliché to say that the best parts of a movie are in the trailer, but it is dead accurate in the case of Shrek the Third. I counted a total of three scenes that I found at least somewhat humorous that didn't appear in the trailer. I won't ruin them except to say that I did laugh out loud at the Hooters sight gag. The reason I said to add a half point to my score if you haven't seen the trailer is because the crowd I saw it with laughed at every single gag that was in the trailer.
One thing that is a staple of Shrek films is their use of pop rock in the films and they used plenty in this one too, but the use of music was erratic at best and just wrong in others. When one of the characters dies at the beginning of the film, the song used was "Live and Let Die", which I'm sure was supposed to be funny and sweet, but it just came off as mean and out of place.
When it comes down to it, Shrek the Third plays more like a pilot for Shrek: The TV Series. The writers essentially threw a bunch of sitcom situations into a feature length film and the result is an uneven mess that makes no sense at its best and absolutely sucks at its worst (don't even get me started on how the bad guys turned quicker than Anakin in Revenge of the Sith at the end). If you have a child and are going to get dragged to this right away, you have my sympathy and may God have mercy on your soul.
• ![]() |

Related Articles
- » The Betting Table: Summer Edition - This Week: Shrek 3
- » First Shrek 3 Trailer; Not Again…
- » Seen Shrek 3? What Did You Think?
- » DreamWorks Animation's Shrek Goes Fourth Plot Revealed?
- » DreamWorks Hires Writer for Puss in Boots Spin-Off
- » Must Watch: Brian Goodman's What Doesn't Kill You Trailer
Reader Feedback - 9 Comments »
1
I thought the trailers looked terrible and unfunny … so if the best parts of the film are in those trailers, then … AVOID AT ALL COSTS!!!!
Ray on May 17, 2007
2
Ye-ouch. Like Ray, the trailer didn't have me all that excited, so if it contains the best parts from the movie…I think this may be one to skip.
Edward on May 17, 2007
3
3/10? That's awful, I wasn't expecting it to be as good as its predecessors…but wow.
kenada on May 18, 2007
4
[...] Despite the first two becoming firm favourites amongst both the public and critics, it seems that the third Shrek film isn’t destined to be as successful, receiving poor reviews across the board. Rotten Tomatoes average rating on the Tomatometer currently stands at a meagre 43%, whilst over at FirstShowing.Net they awarded it 3/10 calling it an “uneven mess”. If I’m perfectly honest I wasn’t enraptured by the first two films, but I thought they were fairly decent, so seeing this one fall flat on its face is a little surprising. First Spider-man and now this, The Bourne Ultimatum and Pirates of the Caribbean had better be kick-ass or my summer will be shit. Posted by David in General, News Categories [...]
Shrek the Third Disappoints Critics on May 18, 2007
5
I'm also surprised at how bad the film is. I thought it might be decent, but after reading Alex's review, I might not even bother renting this catastrophe. :O
DVDRentalForums on May 22, 2007
7
Shrek the Third is not that bad.
Check out my review here:
http://andydreamseeker.blogspot.com/2007/06/movie-review-shrek-third.html
andydreamseeker on Jun 3, 2007


















