

- Sony Will Be Rebooting Spider-Man All Over Again in 2012! (135 Comments)
- 2010 Golden Globe Awards Winners - Avatar Wins Best Drama (97 Comments)
- Avatar Finally Passes Titanic as Highest Grossing Movie Ever (96 Comments)
- 82nd Academy Awards Nominees Are Officially Announced (96 Comments)
- Update: Spider-Man, Spider-Man, Does Whatever a Reboot Can (89 Comments)
- Watch This: First Official Trailer for Jon Foo's Tekken Movie (79 Comments)
- Rumor: Penélope Cruz Cast in Lars von Trier's Melancholia? (Feb 9, 2010)
- Rock Band Phoenix Scoring Sofia Coppola's Film Somewhere (Feb 9, 2010)
- Lionsgate's Saw Series Finally Ending at Saw VII This Year? (Feb 9, 2010)
- Casting Tidbits: Rachel Weisz, Cate Blanchett, Amber Tamblyn (Feb 9, 2010)
- The Cove's Mark Monroe to Make Formula One Documentary (Feb 9, 2010)
- Peter Bogdanovich Will Be Around for the 'Turn of the Century' (Feb 9, 2010)
Producer Adds Personal Touch to Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
February 22, 2008
Source: SnitchSneeker.com, MTV
by Kevin Powers
Last year's Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix was criticized for widely cutting various scenes from the book, ostensibly not staying true to the written version. At 870 pages of material, there should hardly be an expectation that every scene will translate as-is into a commercial production. Next up is Half-Blood Prince, the sixth book in the series, and despite being similarly voluminous (at 652 pages), we learned recently that producer David Barron, along with the usual cutting of material, is actually adding a scene to the story. Judiciously trimming is one thing, but actually including a new sequence - one that was not authored by J.K. Rowling herself - is a really daring move.
Barron told Australia's Herald Sun (via SnitchSneeker.com):
"This was brought in because Jo (Rowling) was able throughout the quite lengthy book to keep dropping little snippets of what was happening in the outside world - there'd be people reading newspapers and talking about how somebody's parents had been killed, or somebody had been withdrawn from school because their parents didn't think it was safe."
Baron's aim is to make the audience more aware of the parallel strife experienced in Potter's domain as well as the outside world of the Muggles.
"The book is peppered with those moments, but we couldn't do that quite so easily in the film. So (the extra scene) comes in the middle of the film and it just reminds us the world is no longer a safe place. Even in what would normally be considered the safe haven of the Burrow, nobody's safe."
"I think you'll like it. It's quite effective."
I'm curious why such explanation is needed. Perhaps this scene seeks to make clear a point that can only truly be derived from the lengthy nature of the book. In that case, since you can't exactly have a 4-hour movie, Barron's move might make sense - distilling plot points that span unwieldy pages into one, albeit new scene. Of course, that's just a guess. Adding your own ingredients to the Potter stew isn't exactly the greatest idea, regardless.
Complicating this move further is a scene that begins the seventh book, Deathly Hallows. Shawn Adler of MTV speculates that this additional scene in Half-Blood Prince might, in fact, be a Death Eater attack on the Burrow. However, he rightly points out that a similar event takes place during Bill and Fleur's wedding in the beginning of the following book. So will there be two such scenes, or will one adversely influence the other?
To be fair, Barron knows a thing or two about Harry Potter. He was executive producer on both Chamber of Secrets and Goblet of Fire, and is attached as producer to the in-production Half-Blood Prince and the 2010-slated Deathly Hallows. Translating the hefty Potter books has always been a challenge, and it will continue to be.
While adding a scene to the Half-Blood Prince might be an efficient move here, Barron recently spoke to MTV about actually splitting the forthcoming Deathly Hallows into two movies. "But the real positive, if we were to do that, would be that we wouldn't have quite the battle we always have of 'How do you compress all that book into just over hours of screen time?' It would be brilliant not to have to cut anything. But at the same time, we have to think it through properly."
• ![]() |

Related Articles
- » First Look: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince!
- » Sound Off: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince - Thoughts?
- » Very First TV Spot for Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
- » Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince is Rated PG - So What?
- » First Official Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince Posters!
- » Konnichiwa, Japanese Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince Trailer
Reader Feedback - 3 Comments »
1
"It would be brilliant not to have to cut anything." Im guessing that every single harry potter fan would agree with him on this point. As I do. Make two films. I and every potter fan I know would plop down 10.50 or however much it is for each one. And don't put them out a year apart, its two parts of ONE book; make it six months. Say, one in November or December and the other in May. The studio would make BANK and fans would be happier than if a single shorter film was made.
Keith on Feb 22, 2008
2
I thought the Order of the Phoenix was terrible i never read the books and really dont plan to, i did enjoy the others but it seemed like the Order of the Phoenix was just a complete filler. Lets hope it gets back to being good with the next film.
Curtis on Feb 22, 2008
3
This is absolutely the most brilliant idea they have ever had. If OoTP had been made into two-parts it would have been SO much better. Since they are going ahead with this for DH, they have no excuse not to get every single pertinent thing in there and do an amazing job with it. If they flub the last film they will never hear the end of it.
LemonFaerie on Jul 7, 2008




























