1

So basically this movie destroys all logic.. what the fuck?

CSpuppydog on Apr 7, 2008

2

I didn't even know there was a 3rd one in the works. Should at least be good for some good natured laughs.

TrishaLyn on Apr 7, 2008

3

Yeah the title is rediculous. Lets make kids laugh and at the same time make them stupid.

Heckle on Apr 7, 2008

4

So if it's the "Dawn of the Dinosaurs" then that means the "Ice Age" is through, right? So the title pretty much doesn't make any sense. Reno 911!: Miami.

Frame on Apr 7, 2008

5

Since when do sequel titles have to make sense? Look at Terminator 4: The Return of the Terminator.

Zach on Apr 7, 2008

6

why is there ice way up in the sky, and as ice reflects the most sun how is there life underneath it? it defys logic. and it sounds like he gets eaten at the end but ill probably still see it when it hits pay per view.

harrison on Apr 7, 2008

7

I agree with Zach who gives a shit about the title its just another Ice Age movie does it really matter, its just a fun movie to watch and it probley wont be good anyways the 2nd one pretty much destroyed all hope that the first one had. (Queen Latifah anyone)

Curtis on Apr 7, 2008

8

I might be used to suspending disbelief in movies, but this movie's asking to suspend common sense. "Dawn" of the Dinosaurs?? And then they'll make one about the end of the world… with the same characters that have apparently lived for millions of years.

Alfredo on Apr 7, 2008

9

Oh, so it's a lost world kinda thing…Ok that makes enough (cartoon) sense to keep me from tearing my eye balls out

Rob G on Apr 7, 2008

10

are all of you crazy you do no its a cartoon right it doesn't have to make sense its just spolls to be fun..

Curtis on Apr 7, 2008

11

I honestly fucking hate each and every one of you douche bags that argued about the fucking title to a fucking 3D animated cartoon…

nemes1s on Apr 7, 2008

12

Oh, please. Cartoons are most definitely allowed to defy logic in its themes and storytelling but we're talking about a TITLE. The ridiculous name isn't even satirical and doesn't appear to intentionally promote comedy (a la Reno 911!: Miami), you stupid fucking truck (#11.) 20th Century Fox is simply capitalizing on a financially successful — if low-quality — franchise which is typical Hollywood fare. Still, I was hoping the CG comedy genre would stay fresh with Pixar classics and hit-or-miss Dreamworks flicks.

Frame on Apr 8, 2008

13

People …People … What is going on with you ????

It is 3D animation movies mostly again I am saying mostly for children from age 2-15 ….and it is really good animation … after all for the name it is funny for me because it remind me by Down of the dead hhhhhh but however it pass with the trailer for now we will see what will happen with the movie ….

You can't wait a name like : Godfather or Gangs of New York for such a movie …. yes they could do just name it Ice Age 3 but why they didn't ? maybe to be a bit different from Shrek the third … maybe !!!!

Not every movie has been made for you guys sometimes it is for your children if you have one …

shero on Apr 8, 2008

14

yeah, my kids loved both movies and the second one was funnier than the first. They play with science and the mythologies and the stories are hilarious.

pigmy sloths! hee!

l.21 on Apr 8, 2008

15

That looked AWESOME!!!!!

REAL6 on Apr 8, 2008

16

im sure that my daughter who is 2 at the moment, wont think 2 times about the dinosaurs being alive after the ice age. if it makes her laugh and she enjoys it, GOOD. there are not many wholesome family-friendly movies anymore. I have plenty of time to inform her that the logical explanation for the dinosaurs is different than the movie. But for now, she thinks these movies are fun. I mean, does a 2 year old really care about logic? If we cared so much about logic, then we probably would not watch as many movies as we do? i mean, its a movie, its fantasy. Charolette's web, could a spider logically make spider webs with words? no, but my daughter does not care, its a movie that is fun, wholesome and kid friendly, like ice age. Take it for what it is, a kids movie. SO, needless to say, my wife and myself are excited to watch that stupid squirrel continue to try to catch that acorn and that sloth continue to be the goofiest thing he can be. Maybe it will suck, maybe it wont. but if it bring a smile to my child's face then ok.

taurinh on Apr 8, 2008

17

WOOOHOOO… Scrat in 3D… all that needs to be said….

For my son that is.. haha

Should be a fun .. and yes.. no logic to a land trapped below the ice during the ice age… but WHO CARES… haha… it is what I enjoy about this series.. doesn't need logic…. just dumb slapstick humor and somewhat mixed dialogue to make me laugh and my son won't catch.

Dusty on Apr 8, 2008

18

Can't wait!

Ryan on Apr 8, 2008

19

hey none said that dinos were alive *after* the ice age. from what the teaser shows, it's a land in the heart of earth. besides, it's an animation movie, not an academic encyclopedia!

Reiem on Apr 9, 2008

20

Any 10,000 B.C. complainers left? This is the new Hollywood style: "No sense but fun!"

Peluco on Apr 10, 2008

21

We are talking about the logic in the movie about dinosaurs living under the ice and all that other BS, but I dont hear anyone complaining about talking animals, a mammoth hanging from a tree (2nd) and a Sabertooth that doesn't eat the mammoths or the sloths. That's the worst thing about the internet is people whining about the stupidest things.

We are talking about logic on Apr 14, 2008

22

Some people seem to take animated films WAY to seriously. Yes there does need to be some sense of believability to the situation but it doesn't need to be realistic. Blue Sky's main issue with Ice Age is making a compelling story with compelling characters (except Scrat who is a really great character with a really fun story)

Josh on Apr 15, 2008

23

ahhhh….. the movie idiocracy really was right about where our future is going to be lol…… this is going to make all of the children that see this movie at least 10% more stupid…

Anonymous on Apr 15, 2008

24

#23 and everyone who thinks like that are retarded!!!!! There KIDS!!!! Growing up watching movies and tv shows and reading magazines such as the Smurfs, Superman, Spiderman, The Hulk, must have made you all sooooo intelligent seeing as how they are so logical and mentally stimulating. Movies dont make kids stupid, STUPID PARENTS MAKE KIDS STUPID!!!!!….As for Ice Age it will be funny and kids will love it.

P.S. All superheroes listed above are great, im definetly not bashing them.

D Mizzle on Apr 16, 2008

25

Amen #24, amen.

nemes1s on Apr 16, 2008

26

i don't agree with that at all #24… yes parents do have a affect on children, but your saying TV does not have a effect on kids these days? Rap? gangs on TV have no effect on teenagers and kids? i live by cleveland and i can tell you that that has a huge effect on our culture…

Anonymous on Apr 16, 2008

27

Just Shut Up Its a Freaken Kids Movie!!!!!!!!!!!

WOW on Apr 17, 2008