1

yes… yes… YES! the re-make was so good, the end left me wanting more. so with the use of a good team of directors, writers & cast. dis 2nd part will not disappoint true Halloween fans like me

theTruth on Jun 3, 2008

2

It's most definitely not necessary, but I would go see it, even if it looked horrible.

Tom on Jun 3, 2008

3

No, Zombie did a fantastic job with his remake, end of story, please don't make it worse. Zombie's Halloween was the first good horror remake, they don't need to keep doing this over and over.

Tim on Jun 3, 2008

4

Rob Zombie made Mike Myers more human and realistic thus taking away the demonic undertones involved with the character. I think since he humanized the character and then shot him mutliple times in the face at the end that would have sufficiently killed Myers along with any sequel they were hoping to create. Zombie didn't leave it open to a sequel like the original did (when they cut back to the lawn and Myers had disappeared) so I don't see how it could be successful.

Matt Peloquin on Jun 3, 2008

5

The remake was nothing but a horrible un-needed crapfest. Now they want to do a sequel to the bad remake, WTF?

Why don't they remake bad 70's/80's horror movies instead of remaking the good ones. Go remake the "The Boogens" or something, leave the classics alone.

Scorpio on Jun 3, 2008

6

I don't really think its necessary, Rob Zombie's remake was just okay. I wouldn't watch it again I know that. Unlike the original I can watch when ever I was in the mood for a good ol' horror classic. I cant remember which ending they used in the remake.

Joel on Jun 3, 2008

7

Sad news, I had high hopes for their followup to the amazing Inside. Wanted them to come up with another original horror film but alas, they've fallen plague to the well overdone remake genre.

normf on Jun 3, 2008

8

Didn't he get shot in the head at the end????

Isn't that why Zombie ended it like that so there won't be a sequel according to him?

Ryan on Jun 3, 2008

9

People you are killing me… a movie where he was suppose to point at his picture and say "Boo?", a movie where the Hero says like a little girl may I add "Michael!! its me!! Its Samuel!!!" …. Painful…. let it die let it die let it die. It would of been a better movie if he just called it another "based on a true story" gimmick and not Halloween. poo.

ghostbones on Jun 3, 2008

10

Halloween is my favorite movie. The remake is my least favorite one of all time. They are in perfect harmony.

And I like Zombie other films, but I guess he can only write white trash people. The fact that he explains why Myers is all evil — ruined the movie.

And BTW — there was no ending. It just stopped.

And yes, the casting of new Loomis was a great choice… the way he wrote it was HORRIBLE.

I hope Spielberg himself remakes JAWS before someone else ruins it….

Matthew K on Jun 3, 2008

11

Zombie's version was great. Original movie MM gets shot but the bullet only grazes him so it's not fatal. I wish Zombie was doing it cause he did a kick ass job but we can't all have what we want so I hope this guy follows Zombie's lead because those are some violent shoes to fill.

Tirrell on Jun 3, 2008

12

Um, I thought the Halloween remake was pretty horrible. Seriously, nothing can match the original. There's definitely NO NEED for a sequel. And did anybody else think the girl in the remake sucked? She was really forgettable, unlike Jamie Lee Curtis; the whole movie was forgettable :D. Peace.

Yum on Jun 4, 2008

13

Okay Okay Okay…. I'm going to kill someone myself…

ZOMBIE version was NOT GREAT. And even if you liked it, THE ORIGINAL is MUCH MUCH BETTER.

Michael Myers wasn't grazed. As Loomis says in Halloween 2 "I shot him six times…." He shot him six times in the chest and face… then he fell out the window about 15 feet… killed or injury most men… but he's just pure evil.

We learn to care about Jamie Lee and that's what makes it a good movie. In this one, we don't even meet her until 2 minutes before Myers shows up…

It was a horrible written script. It looked pretty good and the music was good — but the story was awful. I like how he had to make Myers a giant with long hair…

This is why I get so made at remakes of great movies because some 16 year old out there is going to fall in love with it and ignore the original.

But one day they'll remake your favorite movie and you'll be screaming too!

Matthew K on Jun 4, 2008

14

no…..a sequel is not necessary. Rob Zombie's version was awesome…..the original is still a classic though…no doubt. but i mean when Zombie re-imagined it, he left the door closed. no sequel needed. i mean seriously….the movie ended with Laurie shooting her brother….michael myers…..in the face at point-blank range. he's dead. pure evil or not. i mean dont make this another Jason Vorhees where he comes back (how or why….we never know) again and again and again. so i dont think there should be a sequel. that just money talking that all.

MovieJunkie on Jun 5, 2008

15

These Are My Ideas
1.
I Reckon They Should Make The Second One Mainly To Show Laurie Truama Of What Happend With The *Adopted Parents*and Finally Her Real Ones So Basically She Finds Out The Truth Of The Family History I Reckon That Will Be A Good Storyline But Make Sure Rob Zombie Writes It And Creates It His Remake Was Stunning With The Cast And The Music

i do not know but please tell me what you think of it

Nathan192 on Jul 2, 2008