- Sam Raimi Wants to 'Get Back to the Basics' on Spider-Man 4 (111 Comments)
- Must Watch: Teaser Trailer for A Nightmare on Elm Street! (109 Comments)
- Must Watch: Intense Trailer for Mel Gibson's Edge of Darkness (81 Comments)
- Must Watch: Second Official Trailer for Lee Daniels' Precious (78 Comments)
- Check These Out: High Res New Na'vi Photos from Avatar! (77 Comments)
- Paul Blart Director Steve Carr Hired for the Short Circuit Remake (Oct 27, 2009)
- Hitman's Xavier Gens Set to Direct Action Thriller 'The Fallout' (Oct 27, 2009)
- Bruckheimer & Straczynski Adapting 2K's Shattered Union (Oct 27, 2009)
- Steve Carell on Par for Rick Reilly Golf Comedy 'Missing Links' (Oct 26, 2009)
- Jason Reitman Calls Edgar Wright's Scott Pilgrim 'Matrix for Love' (Oct 26, 2009)
- Matt Damon & Josh Brolin Joining the Coen Brothers' True Grit (Oct 26, 2009)
- Ricky Gervais to Host the 67th Annual Golden Globe Awards (Oct 26, 2009)
- Woody Allen's New Film Titled 'You Will Meet A Tall Dark Stranger' (Oct 26, 2009)
| Inglourious Basterds | 10/10 |
| It Might Get Loud | 9/10 |
| Inglourious Basterds | 8.5/10 |
| Star Trek | 9/10 |
| Monsters vs Aliens | 5/10 |
Warner Brothers and Fox Peacefully Settle Over Watchmen!
January 15, 2009
by Alex Billington
It all began on August 18th and finally came to a conclusion today, January 15th. Warner Brothers and Fox have settled over the Watchmen legal case that reached its pinnacle on Christmas Eve when Judge Gary A. Feess stated that Fox "owns a copyright interest consisting of, at the very least, the right to distribute." After meeting for weeks, the two movie studios have settled and Warner Brothers will still be releasing the film on March 6th as planned. Fox will receive a "sizable cash payment" as well as a percentage of the film's box office take. Fox will not be a co-distributor nor will it own a piece of the Watchmen property.
Thankfully this legal battle has ended peacefully and all the fans will get to see Watchmen on March 6th as planned. We were always hoping all along that this would end this way and I'm glad that it did. As much as I could argue about Fox getting money that they don't deserve, at this point it's great to see it end up this way. I think more than anything, producer Lloyd Levin made the most important statement regarding this legal battle and I the most I can do is point you towards that letter yet again. It's time to forget about the legalities and just get ready to enjoy Watchmen in just over 50 more days! Rejoice geeks, it's coming!
•  |
Related Articles
- » Watchmen Update: Fox Still Fighting to Delay its Release!
- » Eight New Awesome Watchmen Posters from Comic-Con 08!
- » Watchmen at Risk of Being Delayed Until June?!
- » Breaking News: Judge Says Fox Owns Rights to Watchmen! Updated!
- » Warner Brothers Has Put All DC Comics Movies on Hold
- » Will Smith's Oldboy Stalled Due to Legal Fight Over Rights
Reader Feedback - 31 Comments »
1
wow… satan has to be freezing his balls off
Janny on Jan 15, 2009
2
Let the loads droppeth.
Jimbo Slims on Jan 15, 2009
3
YES!!! I can't wait!! I'm glad WB and Fox were able to settle and not leave it up to the judge to decide. 50 days!!
Alex on Jan 15, 2009
4
YYYYYYEEEEEEEESSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is the best news ever!!!! Thanks for reporting this
Conrad on Jan 15, 2009
5
Fox doesn't deserve a penny, but this is still the best news I've heard in a while.
Thank god WB gets to keep it, and it gets released on time.
-Peter- on Jan 15, 2009
6
i'm with Peter. on everything.
Al on Jan 15, 2009
7
Thank. God. Or in this case, THANK THE DARK KNIGHT FOR GIVING THE WB THE CASH TO PAY FOX THE HELL OFF.
Fuelbot on Jan 15, 2009
8
Thank God!!!!! Now We can officially start counting down the days, 50 days and counting.
Nate on Jan 15, 2009
9
Itri on Jan 15, 2009
11
I'd rather Watchwomen than Watchmen.
Blackstar on Jan 15, 2009
13
you know why this dispute has been solved?
cos tom rothman has moved to marvel
see: ironman casting/nick fury debacle
evilnik on Jan 15, 2009
14
YEEEEEEEEAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!!!!! WOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOO OMFG under 2 months now fuck its gonna be so sick FUCK YES! perfect topper to my day.
Cody on Jan 15, 2009
15
Now if all the Watchmen fans boycott Wolverine that should negate the money they make from Watchmen.
Jordan on Jan 15, 2009
16
#15
Hell, I'll support it.
Daniel on Jan 15, 2009
17
I won't go any FOX movies this year. Normally, I don't mind them.
Aravena on Jan 16, 2009
19
Finally the ended the crap, hope they end the issues with X-Men Origins:Wolverine shooting problems fast
Fisherr on Jan 16, 2009
20
NICE!!! I figued WB and Zach wouldn't let this be delayed or F with their movie. I HATE FOX! Everyone should boycot their movies to send a message. All they care about is the $$$, not movie fans, not making a quality movie, nothing. Assh@oles!
K on Jan 16, 2009
21
Oh thank god, now I can go see it in IMAX and love the shit out of it when people get confused.
Murphey on Jan 16, 2009
22
Yes, I'm really happy !!!!
Fox will receive a cash payment of $5/10 millions as well as a percentage of the film's box office take, which is 8,5%.
Florian on Jan 16, 2009
23
Alright guys, yes this is GREAT news, but now you cant put the blame on Fox. They deserve the money they are getting and boycotting their movies isnt going to do much, everyones still going to watch their films they distribute, including me.
Nikhil Hariharann on Jan 16, 2009
24
just cause the movie wasn't delayed and everyone seems to be happy doesn't mean it was a "peaceful" settlement. i think that's a bit of a misnomer considering everything that went down.
ThePlaylist on Jan 16, 2009
25
This is good, I guess. FOX does deserve a share of the profits, but at least their name won't be stapled on everything. I still am very pessimistic about the film though.
Chris C. on Jan 16, 2009
26
It's a better outcome then I expected. Fox's Legal team must have had doubts that they could win if it went to trial. Warner Brother's had a good case but I believe that Zack Snyder had more leverage then WB's legal team. I respect Zack Snyder 's decision. It was good for his Cinematic Art Film, WATCHMEN, and for the fans. WB and Mr Snyder could end up losing money if the film makes less money then the cost of production, distribution, advertising and the front up payment to fox and the paying of a percentage of the profits as an end deal. My respect to WB and Zack Snyder Finally;I join my fellow commentators in celebrating the progression of The WATCHMEN to it's planned March 6, 2009 advertised theatrical release date.
Ivan Arcaya on Jan 16, 2009
27
I love this site and think at time is nothing short than awesome…that is until you begin to whine about the legal trouble with Watchmen. If you don't care for Fox, don't go to Fox made movies. Stop watching any X-Files reruns, don't watch the Fox and the Hound Dog…stop crying and grow a pair.
Fox Wins on Jan 16, 2009
28
#27, The Fox and the Hound was a Disney movie, not a Fox movie.
James on Jan 17, 2009
30
Now that this is all said and done and it will still come out March 6th and all that……
This. Movie. Is. Going. To. Suck.
Yes, I am a purist to the concept of the original GN. It took three movies in comparison to the source material to realize that Moore has been more right than wrong in his derisiveness toward film adaptations of his work. I liked V For Vendetta, but the fact that they felt they had update and/or recontextualize it to fit post-9/11 worldstate, takes a bit away from the true cynicism latent in the original books toward the concept of any man-made form of government being inherently flawed and therefore pointless.
But this is about Watchmen, so let me have at it this way:
In all the years I have read this book, I always saw it as an animated (if not anime ala Miyazaki or in the style of Ninja Scroll) maxiseries, with each book deserving of a 90 minute, if not 2 hour, "episode" each, meaning, yes, a 24 hour running time. I own the Absolute Watchmen HC and Dave Gibbon's Watching The Watchmen book, which together are like having a Blu-Ray unrated Director's Cut of Watchmen already, and although the scenes we have seen that correlate almost exactly visually to the book itself are spectacular, they consist of a page or so of a much larger narrative that I don't think you can just do a Frank Miller on and think you can portray things that aren't visual in a visual way just to stay true to the source. The book itself is already written and framed in the best way to approach the story, and it is a huge story that takes place over debatably somewhere between the late 40's (in the Minutemen arc) to 1985, and there's a lot of background that is not our history that does exist in Watchmen (Nixon is still president, I rest my case) that you can't just gloss over and expect the person coming to see this who has never heard of the GN but have been hyped to death with cool trailers to want to see it.
I know others have said this stuff, it's just my take. I will probably still see it one way or another, though I finally saw Speed Racer after avoiding it for a while, and couldn't get through it, so we'll see, that's all. In true geek speak, I have the best movie version of Watchmen that will ever be in my head and nothing will come close, apologies sorta to Zach Snyder.
Punx on Jan 18, 2009
31
I respect Zack Snyder 's decision. It was good for his Cinematic Art Film, WATCHMEN, and for the fans. WB and Mr Snyder could end up losing money if the film makes less money then the cost of production, distribution, advertising and the front up payment to fox and the paying of a percentage of the profits as an end deal.
Hassan on Jul 16, 2009