LATEST NEWS

Akiva Goldsman Will Not Be Directing Paranormal Activity 2

by
March 16, 2010
Source: STYD, Deadline

Akiva Goldsman

Surely you've heard of Akiva Goldsman for his contributions as a writer on legal thrillers like The Client and A Time to Kill to comic book adaptations like Batman Forever and I Am Legend, as well as adaptations of Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code series. However, after directing a couple episodes of "Fringe" and "Kings" it seemed like Goldsman may finally get a feature directorial debut as ShockTillYouDrop reported earlier this morning that he is now the top choice over other people like Brian De Palma and Brad Anderson to sit in the director's chair for Paranormal Activity 2. However, Deadine says it ain't so - Goldsman is producing.

Goldsman has been brought on-board as an executive producer and is helping to flesh out the sequel story with the producing team of Oren Peli (who directed the first), Jason Blum and Steven Schneider. Apparently a director will be chosen imminently. However, more interesting than Goldsman's involvement is something that actor Micah Stout (one of the two main characters in the original film) told MTV where he hints that [SPOILER] despite certain presumably fatal events that transpire in the original, he's be back in the sequel:

"All I can tell you is I'm very excited for the project, it's really cool, it's gonna be really interesting and it's not gonna suck, which most horror sequels… would. This is gonna be good. Well we have money now, but we're staying true to the heart of the movie, to the spirit of it, to the vision. That's all I can say."

The fact that he uses "we" instead of "they" seems to imply that he will return for the sequel, so we'll see. As far as Goldsman's involvement, I've never seen "Kings" but I have seen the episodes of "Fringe" Goldsman directed and he did a phenomenal job with the second season premiere, blending right in to a series that had already established a distinct style, tone and mythology. So if there's anybody who can jump into something like Paranormal Activity and be loyal to what made the original successful and yet add his own filmmaking sensibilities and touches, Goldsman seems like the right guy for the job, even if he's not directing this one.

While he is responsible for Batman Forever and Batman & Robin, I place the blame on Joel Schumacher for turning Batman back into a campy superhero from the 60's and not the dark, dramatic hero that Tim Burton made him into. Hopefully Goldsman, even as a producer, can make this film feel fresh and not like another Blair Witch 2: The Book of Shadows. For now, we're still waiting to hear about the director, but Paramount better find one soon, because they're not going to be able to make an October release otherwise. Thoughts?

Find more posts: Movie News, Opinions, Rumors

Discover more around the web:

Reader Feedback - 10 Comments

1

kill me now...

Cmurder on Mar 16, 2010

2

hope special effects don't take over the movie

Antioch on Mar 16, 2010

3

I'm already sick of hearing about this sequel.

People's Champ on Mar 16, 2010

4

does anybody want this? exactly.

Al on Mar 16, 2010

5

I didn't want the first one...

tra la la la la di da on Mar 16, 2010

6

Batman Forever was one of the best batman movies next to the Dark Knight,batman and robin was not to bad but just killed it. .....just saying 🙂

Spider94 on Mar 16, 2010

7

paranormal activity sucked ass and so will part 2 if they make it. I hope not

Davor on Mar 16, 2010

8

Paranormal Activity worked for the same reason the Blair Witch did; rawness, psychological tension, and video-makes-it-real feeling we get from watching it. Haters can hate the hype that surrounded the films after they made money, but they were good scare flicks. However, you can't do it twice. Did the Blair Witch 2 not prove that a squeal would be a bad idea? Any "realness" is gone. The tension is already spent. If you make a standard looking horror film that follows the rules then you make squeals. If you break beyond those limits, then its done. Here is where creativity becomes a handicap.

Goudos on Mar 17, 2010

9

Why do you give "airtime" to Paranormal Activity??? Do you not see it is a piece of crap? Is there something I missed?? Was I wrong in telling my local theatre this is not even a film and they should take it off(they agreed, did so and even gave me a free ticket). Blair Witch was miles better(albit in a theatre on the west side where ppl were crying, vomiting and terified out of their minds 🙂 ) and cannot really be compared with the crapfest PA is. If this was made in filmschool, it would have gotten a failing grade. Jeez! Stop writing about this shitty "movie" !

David Banner on Mar 17, 2010

10

Paranormal Acitvity was a load of Cheap shit. It would not scare the spots of Cheaters Arse. so am i up for a second one "for get it"

Cineprog on Mar 17, 2010

Sorry, no commenting is allowed at this time.

FEATURED POSTS

POPULAR COMMENTS

LAST YEAR'S TOP 10

Alex's Top 10 - 2017
1. Call Me By Your...
2. War for Apes
3. Shape of Water
4. Florida Project
5. Dunkirk
6. Jane
7. Foxtrot
8. Faces, Places
9. Never Really Here
10. Thelma
Click Here for Thoughts

Jeremy's Top 10 - 2017
1. mother!
2. Lady Bird
3. A Ghost Story
4. The Big Sick
5. Dunkirk
6. Get Out
7. Killing Sacred Deer
8. John Wick 2
9. War for Apes
10. The Beguiled
Click Here for Thoughts

FOLLOW US HERE

Subscribe to our feed or daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main profile on twitter:
For the news posts only, follow this acct:
Add our feed to your Feedly: follow us in feedly

FS.NET ON FACEBOOK