REVIEWS

Brandon's Word: Daybreakers Bites Hard in the Best of Ways

by
January 7, 2010

Daybreakers

Vampires are still hot. Metaphorically, at least. And they don't seem to be just a hold over from the last couple of years; Vampires are still very much a part of the contemporary zeitgeist. Just in the past three years, the Vampire has seen countless iterations. We've seen oversexed, Bayou-Vamps, sparkly, celibate Vamps, Vampire children, religious, Korean Vamps, and, of course, John C. Reilly. And that's just a taste. And in steps Daybreakers, the latest entry in the Vampire sub-genre, tries to take us all back to the past lore by bringing us to the future. And Daybreakers bites hard in the best way.

Written and directed by the Spierig Brothers, Peter and Michael, Daybreakers is the What If? tale exploring how it might be if the majority of the world's population became Vampire, then farmed the remaining humans for their blood, and then exhausted that blood supply in the year 2019. Simple enough. Undoubtedly, it's the simplicity of the premise that allows for such complexity in the world building. And it's the world of Daybreakers that is most immediately gripping. From the very start, the audience is privy to the history of the future via a very clever, non-invasive credits sequence. Through signage, TV-news crawls, and the captivating visuals, the film immerses its audience in the world of the future Vampire. One such sign, at first glance simply a School Crossing warning, reveals the overall attention to detail as the time range listed is from two to three in the morning instead of in the afternoon. This is just one of many examples. But the point is this: Daybreakers treats the Vampire and its lore with the utmost seriousness. And it's so refreshing.

There is no glistening skin or super-speed or retractable teeth in this film. The Spierigs, by returning to the lore of old, have rejuvenated the sub-genre. Make no mistake, sunlight is serious. These Vamps don't have reflections. And without human blood, they'll die. Eventually, anyway. But aside from their chilled skin, lack of a heartbeat, reflective eyes, and fangs, they're not all that different from us humans. The world of 2019 has adjusted to the presence of Vampires. Earth runs at night. This leaves the day for the few humans not being farmed. All of which are on the run. 'Cause these Vampires are deadly. And they're frightening. Exactly as they should be.

You may have noticed that I've not exactly touched on the film's story. Well, as I said, it's the world of Daybreakers that's most intriguing. The story is fairly formulaic. Our entrance into the world is led by Edward Dalton, played by Ethan Hawke. He's Vampire, though sympathetic to humans. He's also the chief hematologist at the largest blood farming company in the world. Tasked with finding a viable blood substitute, a quandary he's been unable to crack, he's thrust onto a path that leads him to become a crucial part of the human resistance. There's a girl, of course. And Willem Dafoe, who's outstanding. Think Woody Harrelson in Zombieland. But the path that Ethan Hawke is set upon is built on a foundation of coincidences. And once it starts, there's really only one way it can turn out. And that's exactly the way it does.

There's an interesting allegory being told in Daybreakers, though. One about the overuse and exhaustion of our own resources. About the creation of substitutes that will never actually replace the real thing. About the power and detrimental nature of mega-corporations, over-farming and the importance of sustainable farming practices so as to not exhaust our own food supply or poison the supply we have. But this allegory is only present if you want it to be. It's about as subterranean as the sub-walkways built underneath the city so that the Vamps can travel during the day.

Overall, Daybreakers is a concentrated vial of fun. It winds the fiction clock back on the Vampire lore while still progressing forward with some really interesting, often terrifying additions. I commend the film for treating Vampires seriously. For treating the natural enemies of Vampires (sunlight, stakes) seriously. And for finally providing an explanation of how and why Vampires transform into bat-like creatures that makes complete sense and is just so damn cool.

So even though the story rides its rails straight down the pike toward the end, the beginning's world building is so well done, I didn't really care. The direction is solid and stylish. And for twenty-one million dollars, the film's effects are phenomenal. With Weta Workshop behind all of the creature models and practical effects, there's a visceral sense of realism to every bite and every crossbow explosion. And the blood! It's thick. It's dark. And it's plentiful. Just as it should be. So go in expecting plenty of gore, earsplitting scares, and a startlingly realized world. Just don't go in looking for After Sunset, the third film in Linklater's Before Sunrise/Before Sunset series. (Though the title does fit perfectly.) And make sure to take a Twilight fan. Just so you can show ’em exactly what Vampires are supposed to be.

Find more posts: Opinions, Review

Discover more around the web:

Reader Feedback - 23 Comments

1

meh,vampires feel so 2009. they shouldve released this last year.

twispious on Jan 7, 2010

2

Im so excited for this film...first 🙂

OCP on Jan 7, 2010

3

I may see this over the weekend. I'm not sure yet.

Film-Book dot Com on Jan 7, 2010

4

thankfully this isn't twilight. And vampires are not 2009, its just that bullshit twilight thats annoying and makes it so. Can't wait to see it.

LC on Jan 7, 2010

5

I'll definitely see this movie on Friday. Can't wait.

akumred on Jan 7, 2010

6

Isn't there a book similar to this movie...I believe it was called "I am Legend" Although the premise for this movie sounds closer to the book than the movies made based off the actual book.

nightrogen on Jan 7, 2010

7

..... YOU NEED A (GODDAMN) EDITOR BRANDON

Voice of Reason on Jan 7, 2010

8

got advance screening ticks for tonite. hope it's good

lego on Jan 7, 2010

9

#7 - What's so bad about it? Send me a version that's edited properly via my email and I'll take a look at it. Thanks.

Alex Billington on Jan 7, 2010

10

Saw the flick at a screening a couple weeks ago. I was rather surprised at how lame the storyline was. The world building could have been phenomenal but the idea of establishing 'rules' went out the window. Ethan is really dull, Sam Neil is a moustache-twirling villain, Willem D. is a walking cliche and the whole plot grinds along exactly as you anticipate. Big disappointment for me.

Matthew C. on Jan 7, 2010

11

It’s not a bad Review Brandon Daybreakers but you could have got to the story a bit early than you did but it not bad so give him a brake. ?

Cineprog on Jan 7, 2010

12

The trailer made me see this movie; I’m a big vamp fan but this film sucked poo. The concept was good but they just fail to deliver on the story and acting. For some reason for the 1st hour and half you just sat there waiting for something to happen which came in the form of some crappy ghost of mars type action. The only real scene I enjoyed was in the kitchen which was ok but got more of a laugh than a scare. I was really looking forward to this film and managed to drag some friends to see this, they will never trust me again.

Eye Spy on Jan 7, 2010

13

gotta check it out now! will take the biggest Twilight fan! hell yeah!

ray on Jan 7, 2010

14

Not expecting anything major from this film. Sorta like Book of Eli.

People's Champ on Jan 7, 2010

15

If you go in with low to regular expectations, you will be entertained from start to finish. Won't change your life, but it's a very solid film with some interesting ideas. Don't believe the hate! HH

Have Hope on Jan 7, 2010

16

"And for twenty-one million dollars" -? It only cost $21 million? Wow!

David Banner on Jan 7, 2010

17

hey just checking, but isnt the picture in the review a HUGE SPOILER? if ethan hawke is a vampire and from the trailers it looks like the vampires cant be in the sun (a la twilight), then is there a spoiler that hawke is just a human pretending to be a vamp? hmmmm

mcgruff on Jan 7, 2010

18

I saw it tonight in an advanced screening - one of the worst movies i have ever seen good idea badly done, willem dafoe reduced to one liners and snarls, there is a moment whre my friend and I turned to each other and said look its han solo! anyway i wouldn't rush out to see this movie, not scary at all and so badly done

greg on Jan 8, 2010

19

All I've been hearing are great reviews! I cant wait to see it!

lana on Jan 8, 2010

20

@7 You're a retard. His review is fine. Go back to your mom's basement.

BRbomber on Jan 8, 2010

21

It's a decent watch. I'd recommend it to someone who isn't a little wannabe movie critic.

Izyk on Jan 9, 2010

22

to many vampire movies.DAMN you twilight!

chuck on Jan 9, 2010

23

Saw the film for the 1st time yesterday. Starts off well, kept my interest going, by the end of the movie it just became a blood fest and it was predictable and disappointing.

Ezza on Feb 4, 2010

Sorry, no commenting is allowed at this time.

FEATURED POSTS

POPULAR COMMENTS

LAST YEAR'S TOP 10

Alex's Top 10 - 2017
1. Call Me By Your...
2. War for Apes
3. Shape of Water
4. Florida Project
5. Dunkirk
6. Jane
7. Foxtrot
8. Faces, Places
9. Never Really Here
10. Thelma
Click Here for Thoughts

Jeremy's Top 10 - 2017
1. mother!
2. Lady Bird
3. A Ghost Story
4. The Big Sick
5. Dunkirk
6. Get Out
7. Killing Sacred Deer
8. John Wick 2
9. War for Apes
10. The Beguiled
Click Here for Thoughts

FOLLOW US HERE

Subscribe to our feed or daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main profile on twitter:
For the news posts only, follow this acct:
Add our feed to your Feedly: follow us in feedly

FS.NET ON FACEBOOK