LATEST NEWS

Darren Aronofsky Joins the Shortlist to Helm 'The Man of Steel'

by
September 27, 2010
Source: 24 Frames

Superman / Aronofsky

Though we'd recently heard that director Darren Aronofsky may be in the running to direct the sequel to X-Men Origins: Wolverine, we now hear that there's potential for the auteur to make his studio film debut with another superhero. We've heard that producer Chris Nolan has started taking meetings with directors like Matt Reeves and Duncan Jones to possibly helm The Man of Steel, Nolan's Superman reboot. Now 24 Frames has discovered that Nolan may have also met with Aronofsky about the project. That's quite an undertaking for a filmmaker that hasn't directed a major studio film like this, but it's not the craziest idea.

Surely a director like Aronofsky could deliver Superman in the same way Nolan delivered a new Batman, but it's still quite risky. Once again, Aronofsky's name is just one amongst an intimidating selection of directors, some with much more studio experience and box office success. It would be interesting to see just how much creative freedom would be given to a director like Aronofsky with such a precious property. I'm sure Warner Bros is ready to trust Nolan's every decision, and he likely won't pick a director that doesn't line-up with his proposed take on the reboot, but this just seems a little to off-the-wall (no matter how good the buzz on Black Swan may be) to actually happen. We'll find out in the next few weeks once Nolan and Warner Bros make their decision. In the meantime check out Alex's fresh video interview with Aronofsky himself. Do you want Aronofsky to direct The Man of Steel?

Find more posts in Movie News, Opinions, Rumors

Discover more on ZergNet:

  • Da Man
    I don't know. He seems like one of those creative types who might take this in a wierd direction. I mean I'm all about originality, but it seems kinda risky with someone as iconic as Superman.
  • Greg
    Darren Aronofsky's movies suck. I've seen all of them and they always come up short when it comes to story and direction. The Fountain was two hours of my life that I will never get back. His only good movie is The Wrestler. However, The Wrestler didn't have an ounce of commercial appeal which a big budget movie like Super-Man requires if the studio wants there total money back. Not only that, Darren Aronofsky goes out of his way to make sure that the photography and set design of his movies look like the inside of a run down-disgusting trucker-stop bathroom. My vote is for Tony Scott. He's more talented than all the director's on that list including Christopher Nolan. Tony Scott directed one of the biggest legends of all time: Top Gun. I think that Beverly Hill Cop 2 which is also directed by Scott was the highest grossing action-comedy when it first came out (well besides part 1). So he is more than qualified.
  • Eli
    Darren looks like Christian Bale don't you think? I think that as long as the script by nolan is solid enough it'll be good to go.
  • Richard
    ^The Taking of Pelham 123 is one of the WORST MOVIES ever made. BIG NO to Tony Scott.
  • Xerxex
    Greg you are entitled to your opinion...but you are definitely in the minority, Aronofsky is a great director. I for one loved The Fountain, but found The Wrestler kinda bad...however Tony Scott isn't that great of a director...I mean I enjoyed Crimson Tide and Man on Fire but he isn't what I'd say as "Able to do a proper supes film." I for one would love to see Aronofsky helm "Man of Steel."
  • Nethanel
    @ Greg, I doubt Tony Scott would bring a new dimension to Superman that we haven't seen, but I think Arronofsky would whether it be good or bad, it would be original in direction.
  • lego
    @ greg, Aronofsky bad? really...i didn't know... sure i mean Fountain was his weakest, but Requim and Pi..come on. the only good movie tony scotts made as far as i'm concerned is True Romance. Man on Fire was above average sure, but everything else he's done was average at best. the Pelham remake was pretty shitty. Aronofsky over Scott any day. I just wish he'd remake Robocop already.
  • Craig
    Last night's episode of Mad Men had Jon Hamm ripping his shirt off, buttons flying everywhere. That's all I'm saying.
  • Sam
    How much have Tony Scott's movies made? Around a Billion Dollars!! How much have Darren Aronofsky's movies made? Around 100 million which is TEN PERCENT OF WHAT TONY SCOTT HAS DONE. It's true a lot of the internet and comic fan's love Aronofsky's movies because they are original. Original doesn't mean box office that most people want to see them. Most of his movies have been box office failures and the numbers speak for themselves. But, the ENTIRE world loves Tony Scott's movies ten times more. I think that some of you failed math in the fifth grade. Greg is totally right. Mention The Fountain to your average person and they won't know what you are talking about. But, EVERYONE knows and have seen Top Gun and several other Tony Scott movies. End of debate.
  • #9 - But what the hell does box office have to do with the quality of a movie AT ALL?!! Aronofsky is a BRILLIANT filmmaker and if you can't see that, I feel quite sad for you, as his films have been some of the best in the last decade. I don't know if he's the perfect fit for Superman, but his films have been a lot better than the crap Tony Scott has been churning out recently. Seriously, I don't understand your argument at all. Just because someone has made a lot of money putting out pure crap that mindless audiences eat up doesn't mean he's a) the best director for a project like Superman or b) even going to make Superman a success. Audiences are smart enough nowadays to pick up on great films and support them, and subsequently those films make a LOT of money. Inception is a great example of that. Aronofsky is much better than (the current) Tony Scott in every way.
  • Cracky
    ^Ba-zing.
  • lego
    i'm asian, my math is impeccable. nuff said.....lulz. tho figuring out the relationship between your point and comparing the differences between Aronofskys talent and most of Scotts crap is likely to be a problem that i'll never be able to solve. guess you win. mmm
  • Craig
    #9 I suppose you think Michael Bay is immensely talented as well?
  • wm
    i would totally go for a film where Superman's pupils dilate at rapid speed and shoot up to get his super powers. Bring on Requiem of a Superman.
  • Cody w
    Im sorry but Tony Scott sucks lately(like Alex said) and I love Aronofsky's stuff but damn Superman just doesnt fit him IMO.
  • tazz
    #9 mention Chris Nolan "Follwoing" and the average person won't know what you are talking about also. but Chris Nolan made one of the greatess comic book movie. Tony Scott has fall from grace everyone can bring on Top Gun all they want but thats not his recent movies. his recent movies have been a miss
  • It looks like a joke ... First : Matt Reeves, Jonathan Liebesman , Duncan Jones , Zack Snyder ... Now : Darren Aronofsky !!! I think it will be a nice idea if they all make a short film and then collect them in one Movie ... As they did for The Hire with Clive Owen : Star (2001/I) .... Guy Ritchie Powder Keg (2001) .... Alejandro González Iñárritu The Follow (2001) .... Kar Wai Wong Chosen (2001) .... Ang Lee Ambush (2001) .... John Frankenheimer Or something like September 11 : Youssef Chahine Amos Gitai Alejandro González Iñárritu Shôhei Imamura Claude Lelouch Ken Loach Samira Makhmalbaf Mira Nair Idrissa Ouedraogo Sean Penn Danis Tanovic Or ... Just let it wait until Nolan is free and direct it by himself ... !!!! 😉 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- By the way what happen with Batman and Superman movie !!??? They had an idea to make a movie with both heroes !!! years ago !!!
  • TREY
    Me and my dad were having a discussion about the superman reboot. We both agreed we want to see superman bleeding....shirt ripped up and in true PAIN!!!! Someone has to make this superman memorable and not in the Christopher Reeves 1980's way...but the 2000's Batman Dark Knight way!!
  • Mr Black
    I think Tarrantino would be perfect for this, Pam Grier as Lois Lane, Samuel as Lex Louther, Steve Buschemi as Jimmy and.... John Travolta as Superman. The story would be...
  • TREY
    #19...the story would be wack....now go to sleep
  • Cmurder
    I think Uwe Boll should direct this...HAHA!....seriously, I would kill myself if that happened.
  • Craig
    #17 - if you're referring to the Batman+Superman logo that was in I Am Legend, that was never serious. It was just an easter egg.
  • #22 I didn't mean the one we saw in I am Legend ... I meant this one with the Justice League : http://www.firstshowing.net/2010/08/06/rumor-justice-league-on-the-way-sans-batman-and-superman/ But again it is just a Rumor !!!
  • Cmurder
    My dream director for this would be David Fincher!
  • Suilebhain
    While I think Aronofsky is a great filmmaker, I think a better superhero choice for him, if it were under discussion, would be Doctor Strange - someone more angst-ridden and surreal. While I enjoy Tony Scott's films on a visceral level, he is a B-film director riding on his brother's coattails. He is far more suited to be working for Roger Corman. His films all fall more in the middle of the bell curve, thus having a greater appeal for people who think that going to see a film requires giant slurpies and jumbo popcorn. Michael Bay? Gary of Team America got that one right...
  • Jim
    I wrote a script about 10 years ago and a few people told me it reminded them of the movie Pi, which prompted me to view it. I thought it was a painfully slow yawn which pissed me off since I had so many comparisons from others. I watched two more Aronofsky gems and grew angry at how I continued to waste my time with this guys movies, and vowed never again. Well, just tonight we decided to stream The Wrestler, and as soon as I saw that f*ckers name, I was like....sh*t, this a*shole again? So I watched it, and again it reminded me why Aronofsky is still my least favorite director. A big giant unresolved piece of crap IMO. Others may make worse movies, but collectively, nobody is as consistently poor as Aronofsky. Never again Mr Aronofsky (which is unfortunate because I really wanted to see Portman and Kunis kiss). LOL
  • Millions of people are now facing different kinds of financial crisis. Everyone is tightening their belts just to make enough for the family. Yet there seems no end to the problems. Salary cutbacks are everywhere. Employees have no choice but to accept the offer or they would lose their jobs. All are now looking for something that can help them sustain a stable and secure financial condition. But what can someone who is hardly making enough invest on? Buying stocks can be costly, and it is very unstable. One day you can be earning more than you imagined possible and the next day you're trying to sell as much as possible because stocks went down. Investing on a business can be tiresome and may not produce the desired results. But there is still an option to save assets.

FEATURED POSTS

POPULAR COMMENTS

OUR FAVORITES

Alex's Top 10 - 2016
1. La La Land
2. Paterson
3. Arrival
4. Captain Fantastic
5. 20th Cent. Women
6. Pete's Dragon
7. Jackie
8. Kubo & Two Strings
9. Everybody Wants
10. Wilderpeople
Click Here for Thoughts

Jeremy's Top 10 - 2016
1. Moonlight
2. The Handmaiden
3. High-Rise
4. Elle
5. Arrival
6. Kubo & Two Strings
7. 13th
8. Jackie
9. Toni Erdmann
10. The Witch
Click Here for Thoughts

FOLLOW US HERE

Subscribe to our feed or daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main profile on twitter:
For the news posts only, follow this acct:
Add our feed to your Feedly: follow us in feedly

FACEBOOK + LINKS