LATEST NEWS

Director José Padilha Hints at Details on His New Take on 'RoboCop'

by
November 7, 2011
Source: SuperHeroHype

RoboCop

Part man. Part machine. Part hospital. We've known since March this year that Brazilian filmmaker José Padilha, of Elite Squad: The Enemy Within, would be directing MGM's new RoboCop remake/reboot. A few details have come out about it since, including that Padilha wanted someone like Michael Fassbender to star as the new Alex Murphy, but now we have another interesting hint at what to expect. SuperHeroHype posted a few quotes from a recent interview with Padilha, where he explains how the original movie and this one connect, or rather how his fits in, between a certain area during the timeline in the first one. Read on!

Before getting into his film, which is currently in pre-production, Padilha spoke about the original 1987 Paul Verhoeven RoboCop, the violent classic. It all makes sense, so at least he's picking up on the themes in the first movie, and trying to keep those true in his new take, if at possible. Padilha starts out saying (via SHH):

"'RoboCop' the first movie was fantastic," he told us. "But even if there was no movie, the concept of 'RoboCop' is brilliant, first because it lends itself to a lot of social criticism, but also because it poses a question, 'To when do you lose you humanity?' The way it does that is by replacing body parts with machine parts, and that's very smart because guess what? It's going to happen!"

So far it almost sounds like he's talking about the idea of a real bionic man being created out of advanced machinery and computers, since we're nearing that point of progress in technology. So does that mean his RoboCop movie will be a gritty, realistic take on a man-being-turned-into-half-machine? Pretty much. He continues with a veiled answer hinting briefly at how this new movie might deal with exactly that concept:

"I have my take on it," he continued, "And I can tell you this: In the first 'RoboCop' when Alex Murphy is shot, gunned down, then you see some hospitals and stuff and then you cut to him as RoboCop. My movie is between those two cuts. How do you make RoboCop? How do you slowly bring a guy to be a robot? How do you actually take humanity out of someone and how do you program a brain, so to speak, and how does that affect an individual?"

I can definitely see the potential there for a good character study, but it makes me wonder if there's going to be any action? Will we still at least get a sense of the same hard violence from the original? One can only hope. Padilha confirms, with some conviction, that he's going to film some of it handheld. "Listen, they gave me the job, I'm going to do it my way, so yeah, you're going to see myself in there. For bad or for good, I'm going to shoot it the way I shoot it." There was a rumor a few weeks ago that Chris Pine was a frontrunner for the Murphy role, but Padilha didn't confirm anything, except that "We need an American [as] RoboCop, man." I'm intrigued to see his new take, but still not fully on-board, but I'm curious either way. Thoughts?

Find more posts in Hype, Movie News, Opinions

Discover more on ZergNet:

  • ur_babys_daddy
    Interesting to see the murphys thoughts and process theatre were skipped in tie original, but other than that, why make it? As Hot Rod would say, it was number one" we've seen over the top violence so many times since then.
    • Nick S.
      sounds like a fantastic premise, i hope they can pull it off. and to answer your question, "why make it?" all i have to say this: make the damn movie and take care to make it %$#@ing right because the world deserves another GOOD, updated RoboCop film.
      • ur_babys_daddy
        The sequels got worse and worse. The sci fi television movies were just as bad.
  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Vladimir-Chertok/100001513686416 Vladimir Chertok
    i want to see super vilonce ampuatation with robotic part replamecment yea dnsjdfs
  • Max Renn
    Oh for chrissake, just give up remaking this damn movie. The original was an instant classic; unique. There's NO NEED to re-do it!
  • Stanleycowens
    The first was a classic,but I would like to see the character brought back to his glory days after those bad sequels,tv show and tv movie.

FEATURED POSTS

GET MORE NEWS

Subscribe to our feed or daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main profile on twitter:
For the news posts only, follow this acct:
Add our feed to your Feedly: follow us in feedly
Subscribe to me on YouTube for interviews 

RECENT COMMENTS

...

NEWEST PODCAST

FACEBOOK + LINKS