LATEST NEWS

J.J. Abrams Says 'Star Trek 2' Will Shoot in 2D and Maybe Also IMAX

by
December 20, 2011
Source: MTV

J.J. Abrams Directing Star Trek

Even though we're still waiting to learn whether or not Khan will actually turn out to be the villain in the forthcoming sequel to J.J. Abrams' 2009 franchise reboot of Star Trek, we definitely know that the film is hitting theaters on May 17th, 2013 in 3D. However, MTV News recently caught up with the director who revealed a little bit more about the developing sequel that is both disappointing and exciting at the same time. First, Abrams revealed that they will be shooting in 2D and convert the film to 3D in post-production, and while that's a little tragic, they're also talking about shooting in IMAX as well.

Here's what Abrams told MTV:

"We're shooting on film, 2-D, and then we'll do a good high-end conversion like the 'Harry Potter' movie and all that. Luckily, with our release date now we have the months needed to do it right because if you rush it, it never looks good. We were talking about [shooting in IMAX] and I'd love to do it. IMAX is my favorite format; I'm a huge fan."

A conversion isn't the best decision, but I imagine that with all the time for post-production, it could very well turn out all right. But what's really thrilling is having another major blockbuster looking to shoot in IMAX. Abrams doesn't specifically say whether they're planning on shooting the whole film in IMAX or just certain sequences like The Dark Knight or Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol (in select IMAX theaters now and everywhere else on Friday), but any IMAX for a deep space adventure is good news. Hopefully we'll have some more solid information and story details on the anticipated sequel soon enough as Abrams also says, "Our sets are almost done, so we're going to go back and start shooting next month." Stay tuned.

Find more posts in Development, Movie News

Discover more around the web:

Loading...
  • Xerxexx
    Epic yay!
  • TumM
    Bless IMAX Curse 3D!!!
  • Chris Amaya
    Haven't they learned that 3D is pretty much a dying fad?
    • Jericho
      i cant believe i heard that exact line on 'singing in the rain' when they asked an actor about voices in movies......
      • Xerxexx
        Audio is vastly more important that 3-D.
  • YAY.  no 3d, IMAX all the way though!  I would love to see a movie that was shot "entirely" in IMAX...and yes, I would pay extra.
  • Save the money and keep it in 2d, and with the money they saved shoot the whole thing in 65mm. Oh yea!
  • Anon
    now the only question left to be answered is... will there be lens flare???
    • Xerxexx
      Guaranteed.
  • Adcoria
    Good, Screw 3D!! JJ knows what Im talking about, 3D is a waste of money and is pointless
  • SavageHawk
    Rumor has it that only the lens flares will be in 3D
  • rennmaxbeta
    Don't forget a decent script this time, J.J.
  • ... why are you complaining about the 2D thing Ethan? 3D is unnecessary and will die AGAIN soon.... 
    • I'm complaining because it's being converted to 3D. I would rather just have the film presented in 2D if it's not actually being shot in 3D. Sorry if that wasn't clear.
  • Noclue002
    YES!!! haHA! thankyathankyathankya mista J.J. for keeping Trek clean and clear of that 3D garbage!
  • Random_dude
    Its a shame not using the 3D in this day an age. I mean, I will see the movie in 2D, Its just a question of option. I say its a shame because the 3D version (converted) will never have its full potential.
    • Xerxexx
      Doesn't really need to have its full potential shown?
  • Lebowski
    3D technology is superfluous, idiotic tinsel designed to distract toddlers and mouth breathers. If a filmmaker can't create a compelling aesthetic and world in two dimensions, adding a third one won't help. Go JJ, I look forward to the lens flare.
    • mattie
      Have you not seen Hugo in 3-D? Amazing! "If a filmmaker can't create a compelling aesthetic and world in two dimensions, adding a third one won't help." But if a filmmaker CAN create a compelling aesthetic and world, properly adding a third dimension can be magical! I will definately see the 2-D version of this since I absolutely loved Star Trek and I'll check out the converted to 3-D version just to complain about how bad the conversion is.
  • Sammieyayho
    Why convert it at all? Why can't we just enjoy 2D?
  • Mexfood@YAHOO.COM
    in this movie those jim fall in love or we are going to wait for the next one
  • Necro
    Yes!  Down with 3D and mouth breathers everywhere!

FEATURED POSTS

POPULAR COMMENTS

OUR FAVORITES

Alex's Top 10 - 2016
1. La La Land
2. Paterson
3. Arrival
4. Captain Fantastic
5. 20th Cent. Women
6. Pete's Dragon
7. Jackie
8. Kubo & Two Strings
9. Everybody Wants
10. Wilderpeople
Click Here for Thoughts

Jeremy's Top 10 - 2016
1. Moonlight
2. The Handmaiden
3. High-Rise
4. Elle
5. Arrival
6. Kubo & Two Strings
7. 13th
8. Jackie
9. Toni Erdmann
10. The Witch
Click Here for Thoughts

FOLLOW US HERE

Subscribe to our feed or daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main profile on twitter:
For the news posts only, follow this acct:
Add our feed to your Feedly: follow us in feedly

FACEBOOK + LINKS