LATEST NEWS

Please Forgive Me , I exactly Know how terrible writer I am and I know some ideas of mine is shitty but can't didn't write this argument about video games , if I bother you forgive again and sadly I know no one read this : Perfect Match , YES , Fassbender is Fit. But I say ( Exceptionally Silent Hill movie ) Max Payne , Hitman , Lara Croft , Doom be were OK but be weren't in size of ownself fantastic games. Prince Of Persia & Assassin Creed were similar to eachother. I'm not fan of Mike Newell. I think POP was great film , I love it but not was in same level of video game at all (God Know How I Love See Another Worthy Movie Sequel). Game was incredible , specially first 3 episode of game was pretty outstanding & enjoyable. Why video games's cinematic adaptions usually fail? Why do MILLION people play a game like Max Payne but cinematic adaption turn to such un-popular result? Are Games too childish? Do Cast&Crew mistake? Answer is (cause of fail is) : 1- Moviemaking merely for $ / 2- Lovelessing In Directing / 3- Not Using of game makers in cinematic adaption They make this adaption(s) only for $ unfortunately , it's not bad thing but bad thing is for them truthworthy to original material is NOT ever mind. They want people be happy but don't mind deliver us anything as MASTERPIECE as game was . They dont mind for what QUALITY game had been and what impression had been on gamers. They only want know what QUANTITY game had been and how many gamers love that game! In other hand , in bad adaptions , Cast&Crew aren't gamegoer either or at least finish game for one more time. They DON'T LOVE the game and DON'T DYING for it either, they are just bunch of artists (when im talking about dying , dont mean real dying. In fact being True Fan is in my mind) More my argument is in directing and choosing director rather that the Cast , I think their director didn't had TRUE VISION to games. In fact their directors weren't IN LOVE with games. I hope this Adaption would be had TRUE director. Cast is very important but director is vital. Director must be fan of game and DEFINITELY finished one of episode of AC. Look to the great cinematic adaptions based on a video games , Christopher Gans Rock! With good cast (not extraordinary) win the show. Look to the gamers. A guy play a game and he love that playing. He Completely Drown into the game. You cant pull him out easily. He become pure child. Only & Only PURE LOVE make a game ETERNAL for a gamer. There is a lot of love that injects during the making of that game! Then when a guy decide participate at such game/movie adaption things , PURE LOVE is essential and must be seen in his cinematic work obviously. In cinematic adaptions, Games are different with Novels. Novels must be imagine but games are obviou. In fact we built world of book in our minds but game be pre-built in full details earlier and don't need too imagination. Just we must watch it and feel that we are in its universe. Then ATMOSPHERE is most part of cinematic adaption based on video games, because if wasnt same with the game ,simply we dont feel we seeing that game's cinematic adaption. Some people said : " Resident Evil franchise is selling well then company don't need deliver adaption totally based on the game! " But it is a False Implication . If film show sense and atmosphere of game , certainly was sold so much more. Proof : compare RE with Silent Hill film. Silent Hill stick to bases of game and be faithful to it (approximatly) and sell MORE. (But director leave show and Roger Avory had gotten personal problems and next sequel closed for long time unfortunately.) Moreover when movie like RE hit, sequels are inevitable , then a reboot is not possible anymore for many years! And this is bad thing. In fact " PaulW.S "(fan of other works of him) did really bad act. AT LEAST he could choose another title for his movie , like " Invincible Alice " or " Resident Evilless " or " Terminator 5: Rise of the Alice " or even " Citizen Kane 2 "! Whit title of Resident Evil hope for remaking or rebooting real adoption completely Gone! But How? How can movie makers stay faithful to the game while they work on cinematic adaption? How do they know senses of gamers , perfectly? Answer is : They must definitely invite MAKERS of GAME to cooperate with them, this is very effective way. Music of Silent Hill is not something usual that guys like James Horner or Howard Shore even can re-score it or deliver something in that level (BothHugeFan) Akira Yamaoka did UN-Repeatable work in SH(s). He is ONE. No-man can defeat him. Gans use him précisly and result was INCREDIBLE. Directors must use such guys more and more in their adaptions. Game makers are Truely Mastermind. When lovers of silent hill say Silent Hill 1,2,3,4 (specially 2) were Masterpiece , this means this games were UN-Touchable. And this is exactly TRUE either. If you don't play them , then don't judge them. Also I believe , there is NO-Body to adapt this games in whole word ( Maybe , Only Just Maybe the game makers can) Then Hey ! You Guys out there! You know I love you but here is my word : this games change world of million fans. Dont ruin game cinematic adaptions. Pay Attention to Gamers and their SENSEs. They deserve BEST. Use game makers essentially Spend enough money for special effects. Music must be same as game. Script is VITAL, so mush mind need. Work on details , don't do Perfenuctry work. Use who that LOVE & DIE for game as cast&crew and if you don't find such guy at least don't give sequels to the same guy (I am sure there is such guys) I DIE FOR SILENT HILL I DIE FOR METAL GEAR I DIE FOR RESIDENT EVIL I DIE FOR MAX PAYNE I DIE FOR : Fear Effect/Syphon Filter/Dino Crisis/Galerians/Doom/Mass Effect/Prince Of Persia/Gears of War/Bioshock/God Of War/Oblivion New games beside! (Sorry for bad writing)

As long as Fassbender is in, I'm in! And as long as Paul W.S. Anderson (The anti-christ of video game films) isn't involved with this video game film I'm in as well!