LATEST NEWS

Kathleen Kennedy Wants to Delay 'Star Wars' to 2016, But Not Disney

by
October 31, 2013
Source: THR

Kathleen Kennedy / Star Wars

It sounds like the troubled that director J.J. Abrams is having locking down a script for Star Wars: Episode VII might be a little more serious than we thought. We just learned from Lucasfilm that Michael Arndt is no longer writing the anticipated sci-fi saga sequel, and Abrams and The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi writer Lawrence Kasdan were resuming scripting duties. But now a report from THR says that producer and Lucasfilm head Kathleen Kennedy, along with most of the film's creative team, want to push the film to 2016, but Disney CEO Robert Iger is dead set on releasing Episode VII in 2015.

Supposedly, Abrams is more in sync with the 2015 release date, which is good, because Disney will not budge. Why? Well, the trade says, "Iger has crafted a Star Wars game plan that hinges on Episode VII hitting the big screen that summer.” That plan includes "Episodes VII, VIII and IX over a six-year period, with at least two spinoffs." If the film is pushed the 2016, you can expect Disney stock to drop, and that's not what the CEO of a company wants. Plus, a delay of Episode VII would mean a push back of the other films in the works, which include the origin spin-offs we've heard about. An easy solution would be to release a spin-off origin in 2015 instead, but they're probably not far enough along to move quickly. We're hoping this doesn't spell bad news for a troubled production, but we'll find out eventually. Worried?

Find more posts: Development, Movie News, Star Wars

Discover more around the web:

Reader Feedback - 43 Comments

1

This is why it's stupid to announce firm release dates before you even have a script. Disney needs to give this film the time it needs to get done properly or it's all going to backfire on them.

David Diaz on Oct 31, 2013

2

I agree, but then again Lucas has more than enough time to properly develop the prequels and look what happened there..

Tester on Oct 31, 2013

3

The prequels had their flaws but I'm in the camp of having thoroughly enjoyed them. But with JJ and Kasdan taking over the writing, if they feel that they need more time, they should be given it rather than rushing.

David Diaz on Oct 31, 2013

4

I completely agree

11bulletcatcher on May 1, 2014

5

Indeed... though, imagine the train wreck they would have been if rushed!

avconsumer2 on Oct 31, 2013

6

Good point, I had not considered this

Tester on Oct 31, 2013

7

Some people work better under pressure. Anyway at this point who cares really? We have at least a whole year of movies to look forward to, why should we already think about Star Wars? Building anticipation so early on is the best way to set people up for disappointment.

DavideCoppola on Oct 31, 2013

8

True. But I care. This being a critical point (story development). I constantly (within reason) think about Star Wars!! (it's not my fault - blame my parents - first movie I ever saw) But yep, trying not to anticipate. Actually completely avoided the trailers for Episodes 2 & 3 (best I could) to much success - I think I enjoyed them much more than I would have. Started my trend of attempting to avoid trailers of my favorite franchises.

avconsumer2 on Nov 1, 2013

9

DELAY IT.

Zak Coleman on Oct 31, 2013

10

I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened.

DarthVerous on Oct 31, 2013

11

The original cast are not getting any younger, if it's going ahead get it done now or choose a different era in the Star Wars universe and start afresh.

Steven on Oct 31, 2013

12

They can delay it indefinitely for all I care. I'm Star Wars'd out...

Bl00dwerK on Oct 31, 2013

13

with Abrams directing and WRITING...sign me out too. Keep the change

Have Hope on Nov 1, 2013

14

Agree with you Have Hope...I'm already expecting an endless orgy of space special effects interspersed with Star Wars symbology, all in CGI with three or four 20 minute action sequences.

BacchusPlateau on Nov 5, 2013

15

dont forget LENS FLARES

11bulletcatcher on May 1, 2014

16

More delays hopefully mean a better movie. Give it time. Let it be ironed out and perfected

Christopher Philip Cinquegrano on Oct 31, 2013

17

I've got a baaaad feelings about this. Someone had to say it! It'll be fine.

Quanah on Oct 31, 2013

18

Better to take the time to craft a good film rather than rush out a cash grabbing piece of crap that fans will blast holes big enough to pilot a star destroyer through.

theslayer5150 on Oct 31, 2013

19

Expect Disney stock to drop... not what a CEO wants... well sure... but wrecking THIS property to meet a "deadline"?! Watch the stock drop if THAT happens. If Kasdan is part of that "creative team" that wants the extension... by Jar Jar, you'd better damn comply. Yesterday.

avconsumer2 on Oct 31, 2013

20

Do what you gotta do to do it right. Don't rush it.

Dog Fashion on Oct 31, 2013

21

This is what happens when you make a deal with the devil.

Fidel Reyes on Oct 31, 2013

22

Yeah, let's just take our time here. They will make money nonetheless.

DAVIDPD on Oct 31, 2013

23

This CAN'T work if their going to rush it. This is an epic story with a massive fan base and they are creating a new chapter continuing from where we left off with Han Solo, Luke, Leia, droids, ghosts....and ewoks. Bad feeling about this...

conradthegreat on Oct 31, 2013

24

It's all about the money, the days seem long gone where movies had significant effort put into them.

Ry on Oct 31, 2013

25

Delay all the way! Who cares about CEO schedules, this is art! haha!

Lautaro on Oct 31, 2013

26

I'm only worried if they can't delay it and are forced to rush it.

ListenToVinyl on Oct 31, 2013

27

Dumbasses should get the script finished first instead of thinking about stock prices. That said, they could delay this till 2116 for all I care about SW these days.

cobrazombie on Oct 31, 2013

28

I dont give two shit flying fuck about Disney's stock and shit but I do care about this movie. i dont wanna wait three years instead of two for what is being called the most anticipated film of all time. Think about Star Trek. The 2009 film came out, was a critical success and made more money than all the other films. But fans had to wait 4 years for Into Darkness which made the non-fans grow disillusioned with the idea and the film struggled in the US market. This is a prophetic vision for if they are going to delay Episode VII which will be a much bigger deal.

Chris on Oct 31, 2013

29

A much simpler analysis as why ITD didn't do too well. It sucked.

Buzzfunk on Nov 1, 2013

30

Exactly. Disney can push Episode VII back to 2017 if they thought it would be the right time. And everyone would flock to see it. Star Trek? Not so much. Part of what worked for the 2009 film, was that it was brilliant, and a little dumb too. 2 Star Trek In 2 Darkness was just terrible, and THAT'S why.

Zack Daley on Nov 2, 2013

31

Fudge you Robert Iger!

anakinbrego on Oct 31, 2013

32

So there wasn't any other star wars related story's for today?

Jimmy Love on Oct 31, 2013

33

I've been saying that they won't make the summer 2015 release date, they need to just compromise and release it on December 18th, 2015. That way, they get the 2015 date, and their 'one film a year starting in 2016' plan isn't ruined, but they don't have a real sense of a rush. Also, whatever IS scheduled for that date would quickly move once Star Wars took it. Plus, Star Wars is a multi-generational appealing franchise, and there is no better time to capitalize on that than the end of the year holidays when families are often together and when(as stats show) theater attendance takes a nice spike.

Chris Groves on Oct 31, 2013

34

It's not like Disney doesn't have a boat load of major released for summer 2015 anyway. Hell, Avengers: Age of Ultron alone will gross the better part of $2 Billion.

Chris Groves on Oct 31, 2013

35

Something to consider, Avengers 2 isn't starting filming until the new year and that's going to be out Summer 2015. Ant-Man has had its date pushed to July 2015 and that won't start shooting until summer 2014! Plus, I just read that *apparently* Disney's fiscal year ends around September/October, so if it was released in December 2015 it would be part of the first quarter of 2016 for the shareholders. This is obviously the problem, as they're trying to get the 2015 date because it was promised to shareholders.

AaronianKenrod on Nov 2, 2013

36

These movies are going to suck

Buford on Nov 1, 2013

37

this is bad news because they can't come up with a story arc of 3 movies! Disney is right to hold on to the schedule, because if you can't do it in 3 years it will not be certain you can do it in four years! Simple :kick J J Abrahams out and hire a director who has the balls to make a decision and it's not troubled by doubts! Dammit it's star wars and not a cure for cancer!

Avi on Nov 1, 2013

38

Bottom Line: Kennedy is protecting her husband's 2015 Jurrasic Park movie. It's feared Star Wars would over shadow that movie.

Johnny Neat on Nov 3, 2013

39

Kathleen Kennedy isn't married to Steven Spielberg, she's married to Frank Marshall. She (used to be) a frequent producer of Spielberg's and they founde the same production house together. It's not a bad idea for her to be looking at all the other blockbusters being released Summer 2015 though. So many titles it's insane.

Heather on Nov 3, 2013

40

Frank Marshall is producing the next Jurrasic Park, which will get swallowed by Star Wars.

Johnny Neat on Nov 3, 2013

41

You bet you're sweet ass that these movies are going to be bad. They will!! suck. The times that movies made history, the times that movies broke all the rules, and set new standards as far as movie making are concerend, are now over. All those big name movies studios don't care about a good script or a good story or about good acting or about.. etc etc. They just want something that sells....Big time!! They just want stupid and simple entertainment for the masses and nothing to fancy or too complicated.

Benny. on Nov 3, 2013

42

And don't forget, if this movie had any good scene's, action ..whatever. You can count on it that the MPAA wil cut or censor the heck out of this star wars movie. Its gods will...apparently.

Benny. on Nov 3, 2013

43

Its going to be rushed to market,even the prequels were put an insane amount of time and effort into..

11bulletcatcher on May 1, 2014

Sorry, no commenting is allowed at this time.

FEATURED POSTS

POPULAR COMMENTS

LAST YEAR'S TOP 10

Alex's Top 10 - 2017
1. Call Me By Your...
2. War for Apes
3. Shape of Water
4. Florida Project
5. Dunkirk
6. Jane
7. Foxtrot
8. Faces, Places
9. Never Really Here
10. Thelma
Click Here for Thoughts

Jeremy's Top 10 - 2017
1. mother!
2. Lady Bird
3. A Ghost Story
4. The Big Sick
5. Dunkirk
6. Get Out
7. Killing Sacred Deer
8. John Wick 2
9. War for Apes
10. The Beguiled
Click Here for Thoughts

FOLLOW US HERE

Subscribe to our feed or daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main profile on twitter:
For the news posts only, follow this acct:
Add our feed to your Feedly: follow us in feedly

FS.NET ON FACEBOOK