REVIEWS

Review: 'The Hangover Part III' is Good Catharsis, But Awful Comedy

by
May 23, 2013

The Hangover Part III

The Hangover Part III is a bad comedy, and not bad like The Hangover Part II's ridiculous in-your-face rehashing of the first film's inventive and hilarious plot. It's as if Todd Phillips, writer/director of the series, got so fed up with complaints of the second film's copy-and-past attitude that he's gone in a completely different direction, to the point that The Hangover Part III isn't really even a comedy. The dark corner the second film took begins turning even harder from scene one. Full scenes go by without attempts at a laugh. What started out as fun has turned deep, dark and depressing...kind of like a bachelor party.

And there's very little blaming Phillips for taking this approach to following up a film that, in my uneducated belief, he had no interest in following up in the first place. The Hangover was a breath of fresh air in the Summer of 2009. The main cast: Bradley Cooper as the smooth but dick-ish Phil, Ed Helms as the human punching bag dentist Stu, and Zach Galifianakis as Alan, a man who, quite frankly, is insane. Alan has a strange concept of the world where he's eternally 12, yet things like taking roofies and buying giraffes are just fine. He's insane.

The roofie, or general drug use, part is where the first two films begin, insane nights of partying followed directly by long days of figuring out what the hell happened, but told in a sort of reverse order. Both films are incredibly funny, mixing gross-out humor with an odd sense of brotherhood between these three friends Alan has so graciously dubbed The Wolf Pack. Yeah, he's insane. But where the first film was imaginative in structure and nailed solid laughs pretty much throughout, the direct follow-up could only deliver the laughs. It did. The Hangover Part II is a funny movie, but the sense of familiarity at every turn it took was impossible to overcome. That sense also overshadowed the brewing shadow of darkness the entire series was taking on overhead.

The Hangover Part III

That darkness, and the giraffe, are where The Hangover Part III begins. After a quick trip back to Thailand showing the prison break of one Mr. Chow (Ken Jeong),the deranged gangster who keeps making the The Wolf Pack's lives all the more difficult, we move to Alan. And the giraffe, though the giraffe doesn't last long thanks to Alan's carelessness. Also he's off his meds. That poor giraffe and another death at the beginning of The Hangover Part III are the catalyst for an intervention. Alan's family steps in, bringing Phil and Stu along for support, and soon The Wolf Pack plus Doug (Justin Bartha), the lost fourth member who always misses out on the adventures, set out for Arizona and Alan's step towards normalcy. Then things get darker.

John Goodman shows up as Marshall, a drug lord hell-bent on getting his hands on Chow. Marshall believes The Wolf Pack knows where Chow is, kidnaps Doug, and forces the other three to find Chow and deliver him. That setup and the ensuing adventure through Mexico and eventually a return to Las Vegas are certainly laden with that darkness we were talking about. But minus that opening death scene, The Hangover Part III goes to black comedy later in the film when Marshall shoots someone point blank.

The rule for black comedy is that anything can be funny; death, war, famine, yes, even disease. Yes, even sadistic crime lords who kidnap and murder people for the sake of money. And revenge. But while these topics are allowed to be funny, the form in which they come must actually be funny. That's where The Hangover Part III loses every ounce of its potential. The jokes aren't there. This may be a conservative guesstimate, but 60% of the jokes in this film are typical Alan or Chow shtick, represented by either Alan drinking a Tab without a shirt on or Chow firing a revolver to kill crazed chickens he's raised for cock fighting. Those are examples of where The Hangover Part III makes us chuckle, too.

The Hangover Part III

But beyond those random chuckles, this film looks and feels more like a crime thriller, a gritty one, than anything that's supposed to make you entertained with laughter. Apart from the insane moments that usually had Stu screaming "What the f***!", the first two films had a tiny amount of genuine heart. Even though these three friends probably shouldn't have been in each others' lives, you felt a camaraderie between them, and at the end of the hangover day, you laughed with them as they reflected on that day instead of at them for being in the day in the first place. None of that is here in Part III.

Its unfortunate, because that was the part of The Hangover that made you want a sequel. You liked these three being together, and their reactions to all the insanity going on around them was what made you laugh the hardest. With this third film, there's a sense that everyone is going through the motions. Stu gets his "What the f***!" moments, not even really shot for comedy any more, but it's now just Ed Helms screaming the line we've all heard a dozen times before. Neither he nor Cooper have any place in The Hangover Part III. They're here to bounce around Alan and Chow's psychotic universes, and Galifianakis and Jeong end up being the stars this time around. Sadly, they, too, feel like they're just running through the motions.

It's hard to blame anyone for this film and why it doesn't work. Phillips got hit with serious backlash for The Hangover Part II and its familiar return to form. It's no wonder this third film takes a serious departure from anything we've seen before in this series. You could view The Hangover Part III as Phillips giving his critics, and possibly his fans, the finger. But the post-credit moment in this film is what hints at Phillips also winking at those same critics and fans. It's the most insane The Hangover Part III, and probably the whole series, gets, and it shows us exactly what might have happened had The Hangover Part II been met with cheers of "Yes, give us more of the same." Unfortunately, the 90 minutes that come before that are too dark, too dour, and too depressing to overcome. Congratulations, Mr. Phillips. You've killed your franchise. I suspect that was your intent all along.

Jeremy's Rating as a comedy: 3 out of 10

Jeremy's Rating as catharsis for Todd Phillips: 8 out of 10

Find more posts in Review

Discover more on ZergNet:

  • Richard.
    Hmmm.. i watched this and laughed hard. And so did the whole cinema. It was brilliant.
    • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7YGEVuJ4mM Carpola
      Me too. Was funny, best trilogy in the history of cinema.
  • http://youtube.com/flavoredshampoo Matt
    I have absolutely no interest in seeing this (seemingly) pile of shit, EXCEPT for a potential giraffe decapitation bloodbath. Does he deliver the goods here? Or is it totally lame and off screen?
    • Justin
      You see the severed giraffe head go flying and getting stuck in another car's windshield.
      • http://youtube.com/flavoredshampoo Matt
        Getting a notification email that talks about a severed head flying through the air is a great thing, hahaha. Much appreciated.
    • DavideCoppola
      Yea, but if it's only for that we can wait for YouTube no need to give these guys any of our hard earned pennies..
      • http://youtube.com/flavoredshampoo Matt
        Oh, I agree 100%
  • DAVIDPD
    Shame, but not unexpected.
  • better than I thought it would
    To each their own. The whole theatre including myself were laughing a good chunk of the time. Much better than the 2nd. And straying from the original is a good thing. If anything, reward it for the lack of callback jokes to the 2nd film. Only 2 by my count.
  • racquetman
    I'm shocked to hear this sucked. No one could have predicted THAT. Thankfully this whole trilogy will be forgotten in a few short years. The first one isn't nearly as good as people think it was (try watching it again), and the other two just plain suck.
  • Thomas Levesque
    it was funny as Hell. probley going to see it again on Monday. going to also be seeing Fast and Furious 6 tomorrow, Epic on Saturday and The English Teacher on Sunday.
    • jeff
      Wow somebody likes watching shitty movies, Go see Mud! Thats what Cinema is supposed to be like.
      • Thomas Levesque
        shut up. i could see what ever i want, and for your information, i already saw mud and i liked it.
        • rolyjimenez
          lmao
  • yoyoma
    Hangover II is not a funny. Hangover III is just simply a dreadful movie altogether.
    • yoyoma
      not a funny movie*
  • Mark
    I loved The Hangover like most people. Went to see part II hoping for the best, and I actually had a hard time sitting through it. It was simply horrible, the ages old tradition of sloppy sequel writing, loaded with throwback moments that are intended to remind lesser brainy viewers "Oh! I know that! That's that thing I like!" and get a memory response laugh. I wanted to rip my eyes out. So needless to say, I'm both unsurprised and quite thrilled it's being panned. Good riddance Hangover, you never needed a trilogy.
  • Karen B.
    I don't know what you are all talking about! The first was hysterically funny. The second was pant wetting funny because they stuck with the winning formula from the first movie! That is why this one sucks so bad. It is nothing like the first two. They strayed from the formula. so the laughs are few and far between. For those of you who did not like the first two, why did you go to the third? How can you not think a face tattoo, Bangkok drag queen strippers with both perfectly shaped boobs and penis's, cut off fingers, smoking monkeys, and Chow like we like him, and Mike Tyson singing, is not funny, then you need some help! If you are so stuck up and lame that you cannot appreciate the ridiculously funny first two hangovers, then you are obviously not equipped with the capabilities that it takes to laugh at plain funny moments. As Chow would say, "Get a sense of humor!", or go see an Opera! For the writers, why did you stray? If it ain't broke, don't fix it! Just sayin.
    • rolyjimenez
      It was "broke"... it was one of the worst reviewed films of that year... Had it not come out the same year as Jack And Jill then it would have won a Razzie (or several). Hangover II was the same movie in a different location. The writers strayed because of how bad the reviews were for the 2nd. People wanted to see the characters they loved again... not the same story repeated.
  • Cameron
    This movie made Melissa McCarthy unfunny and that's just a crime against humanity!
  • mistermysteryguest
    Hopefully this is the last nail in the coffin for that awful series of "comedies".
  • rolyjimenez
    Stopped reading this article after "Both films are incredibly funny.." Some reviews on firstshowing are on point while others make me question the integrity of this website. My favorite part of The Hangover II was when I walked out to ask for my money back. As much as I would love to say that I won't be watching this film that looks terrible... I know I probably will. I'll probably be paying to see Fast 6 then sneaking into this.
  • Black guy
    Alternate ending was fucking awesome
  • black guy 2
    Idiots, the second movie is by far the best...third isn't a comedy, it's a terrible drama.

FEATURED POSTS

GET MORE NEWS

Subscribe to our feed or daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main profile on twitter:
For the news posts only, follow this acct:
Add our feed to your Feedly: follow us in feedly
Subscribe to me on YouTube for interviews 

POPULAR COMMENTS

NEWEST PODCAST

FACEBOOK + LINKS