COOL STUFF

Cast of 'Little Rascals' Reunites 20 Years Later in Adorable Photoshoot

by
September 3, 2014
Source: 22 Vision

The Little Rascals

It's hard to believe that it's been 20 years since Forrest Gump hit theaters, but the film returns to IMAX screens this weekend for an anniversary re-release for one week only. But another lesser celebrated film from 1994 is also 20 years old, and that's The Little Rascals. The contemporary big screen adaptation of the classic TV series of the same name is certainly a nostalgic movie for kids of the 90s, and 20 years later, a production company called 22 Vision (specializing in celebrating films by reuniting cast members from movies of the past), has brought the cast together for an adorable photoshoot to celebrate the film. Look!

Here's a video from AOL talking about The Little Rascals reunion, looking at the cast then and now:

And here's just some of the photos of 20th anniversary reunion from 22 Vision:

The Little Rascals

The Little Rascals

The Little Rascals

The Little Rascals

The Little Rascals

The Little Rascals

The Little Rascals

The Little Rascals

The Little Rascals

The Little Rascals

The Little Rascals

The Little Rascals

Pretty much everyone came back for this shoot: Bug Hall as Alfalfa, Travis Tedford as Spanky, Brittany Ashton Holmes as Darla, Ross Bagley as Buckwheat, Zac Mabry as Porky, Blake McIver as Waldo, Kevin Jamal Woods as Stymie, Jordan Warkol as Froggy, Blake Jeremy Collins as Woim, Sam Saletta as Butch, Juliette Brewer as Mary Ann and Heather Karasek as Jane. Some of them look eerily similar to their childhood selves, while others look completely different. If you want to know more about where some of these child stars are now, read more at AOL. Reunions like this should happen more often.

Find more posts: Cool Stuff, Photos

Discover more around the web:

Reader Feedback - 33 Comments

1

Does anybody else find these photos weird?

TheOct8pus on Sep 3, 2014

2

Not really...no.

Xerxexx on Sep 3, 2014

3

Yep.. 1. they can't act anymore. or.... 2. The photography director is aweful ... or... 3. The all are.. -ok- looking .. pretty normal faces (except for Hall), which feels weird.

Gina Centanaro on Sep 3, 2014

4

Yes. The photography is awful. Sterile, white background, flat angles and uninteresting lighting. Not to mention that awkward faces of the cast.

TheOct8pus on Sep 3, 2014

5

They just wanted to do something fun...sometimes you don't have to burn a bunch of calories trying to be clever.

DAVIDPD on Sep 3, 2014

6

yes. But who gives a shit? The Little Rascals falls under the category of "shitty remake of a classic TV show" such as Lost in Space, Scooby Doo, The Avengers, The Flintstones, Bewitched...the list goes on.

TheOct8pus on Sep 4, 2014

7

My word! They didn't create the movie especially for your liking or disliking. Keep your nasty opinion to yourself and get over it. It was created 20 years ago as was the only thing they were trying to point out.

Nicole Olsen on Sep 4, 2014

8

Haha! Sorry if I offended you Nicole.

TheOct8pus on Sep 4, 2014

9

No I'm sorry. That wasn't very Christian of me at all. It's been a REALLY bad day.

Nicole Olsen on Sep 4, 2014

10

No need to apologize. The comments section is where you can write whatever you want. Of course, not everybody is going to agree with or like what everybody says. But that's what makes it interesting, no? I'm sorry you're having a bad day. I hope it gets brighter.

TheOct8pus on Sep 4, 2014

11

Thank you!

Nicole Olsen on Sep 4, 2014

12

Here, have a happy goat: http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/736x/38/29/8a/38298aef712b1f56a10fdc467d448795.jpg

TheOct8pus on Sep 4, 2014

13

That's myopic. One man's trash is another man's treasure.

DAVIDPD on Sep 4, 2014

14

Words of wisdom.

Xerxexx on Sep 4, 2014

15

Sounds like someone is disappointed in their own kid's lack of talent.

Hooch on Sep 4, 2014

16

We're talking about the photographer's lack of talent here. Your comment makes no sense.

TheOct8pus on Sep 4, 2014

17

Wrong. You said the photos were weird. You didn't say anything at first about the quality. Don't try to clean it up. You're like a critic who gives low ratings to a kid's movie.

Hooch on Sep 4, 2014

18

If you want to talk about the movie, it's a total piece of shit. The Little Rascals falls under the category of "shitty remake of a classic TV show" such as Lost in Space, Scooby Doo, The Avengers, The Flintstones, Bewitched...the list goes on.... But I wasn't talking about the movie. I was talking about these terrible photos.

TheOct8pus on Sep 4, 2014

19

You got it chief. I'm out.

Hooch on Sep 4, 2014

20

You must be an old fart. I was born in 84 and, as a kid of 10 years old, loved this movie. It wasn't made to cater to old people. It's the same thing with all the hate the new tmnt movie is getting. It's made for today's generation. You know your getting old when you start nagging. ["In my day ....." ]

Daniel on Sep 4, 2014

21

Haha! Dude. It's true. I'm an old fart, but I'm also your age... But seriously, I thought this movie was lame when it came out and I still think it's lame. I stand by my previous comment that it's a shit film. You don't have to agree with me. I don't think my opinion qualifies as nagging. One might say your reply qualifies as nagging.

TheOct8pus on Sep 4, 2014

22

Your last sentence Sir is a medal earner!

UncleBreaker99 on Sep 5, 2014

23

Awesome. I feel old.

Xerxexx on Sep 3, 2014

24

The kid in bowler hat looks the same!

DAVIDPD on Sep 3, 2014

25

Love it! That is awesome. And you richard-noggins below need to lighten up. How many parades have you pissed on?

LightningB on Sep 3, 2014

26

Childhood Enhanced

porkwad on Sep 4, 2014

27

They made a Little Rascals movie in 1994?

cuckoozey on Sep 4, 2014

28

Sadly, yes.

TheOct8pus on Sep 4, 2014

29

There was a Little Rascals movie before 1994?

Ryan on Sep 5, 2014

30

Yes the original came out in the 1930's

Arianne Bwa Kilo on Sep 6, 2014

31

That was a joke but thanks for answering. 🙂

Ryan on Sep 9, 2014

32

Damn! Darla grew up to be a real hottie! Feel kind of conflicted about that!

Joel Colquitt on Sep 4, 2014

33

Maybe it is because by '94 I had aged out of the target demo by about 6 or 7 years, but I honestly don't recall this movie. Weird.

urgaylol on Sep 5, 2014

Sorry, no commenting is allowed at this time.

FEATURED POSTS

POPULAR COMMENTS

LAST YEAR'S TOP 10

Alex's Top 10 - 2017
1. Call Me By Your...
2. War for Apes
3. Shape of Water
4. Florida Project
5. Dunkirk
6. Jane
7. Foxtrot
8. Faces, Places
9. Never Really Here
10. Thelma
Click Here for Thoughts

Jeremy's Top 10- 2017
1. mother!
2. Lady Bird
3. A Ghost Story
4. The Big Sick
5. Dunkirk
6. Get Out
7. Killing Sacred Deer
8. John Wick 2
9. War for Apes
10. The Beguiled
Click Here for Thoughts

FOLLOW US HERE

Subscribe to our feed or daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main profile on twitter:
For the news posts only, follow this acct:
Add our feed to your Feedly: follow us in feedly

FS.NET ON FACEBOOK