Disney Loses 'John Carter' Rights But That Won't Stop More Movies

October 21, 2014

John Carter

While there are those who simply didn't like Disney's adaptation of Edgar Rice Burroughs' classic character John Carter back in 2012, there are even more people who didn't give it a chance because the studio just didn't market it well enough. It's a fun, impressive space adventure worthy of comparison to Indiana Jones and Star Wars in tone and scope, even if it's not the most groundbreaking film. After the film was a huge flop for Disney, there was little to no chance that a sequel would happen, but that doesn't mean we won't see a new John Carter adventure, because the rights to the character no longer belong to Disney.

In fact, a press release has announced that the movie, television and merchandise rights to John Carter have reverted back to Edgar Rice Burroughs Inc., the company founded by the author himself. They've overseen every adaptation of his literary works in publishing, film, television, theatrical stage productions, licensing and merchandising, and now that they have the rights to John Carter back, they intend on taking the property to other studios to develop new films based on the other novels that haven't been brought to the big screen. Can another studio get audiences interested in this character though? We'll see.

Find more posts in Development, Movie News

Discover more around the web:

  • qweqwu
    "It's a fun, impressive space adventure worthy of comparison to Indiana Jones and Star Wars in tone and scope, even if it's not the most groundbreaking film" Neah, it was a shit movie.
    • Xerxexx
      Shit to you gold to others.
  • Xerxexx
    Just keep Taylor Kitsch.
  • TXSteadyEddie
    I liked it and I'd Love to see more movies...Chessmen of Mars...
  • Zak Coleman
    I can count on one hand the amount of movies I walked out on. John Carter was one of them.
  • Jon Odishaw
    Wouldn't say it was good or bad. I liked Taylor as the lead for the first half and then his voice changed inexplicably.
  • Justin R
    As much negative reviews as John Carter got, I personally loved it. I never read the books, but for a PG-13 Disney film, I thought it was good. To each their own, I guess.
  • Ricardo_PT
    What a tragedy!
    I thought it was a fun movie that got over hyped and poorly marketed to the public.
  • si1ver
    I liked it and the music was beautiful. It wasn't great but people have praised much worse movies. People gave JC a really hard time. I liked the ending and the score.
  • Avi
    never seen it, I even didn't download it because of the bad reviews...
    • avconsumer2
      Don't believe the hype. I reckon it was a pretty solid flick. If you dig the sci-fi, must watch. Highly underrated imo. Story is a bit familiar, direction / acting was a bit meh, but definitely worth a rental / stream. Kind of epic in scale really. Would definitely catch the sequel in the theater.
  • avconsumer2
    I rather fear for this franchise without the Disney machine. Though, I largely blame their lackluster marketing for it's box office performance.
  • I really hope they resurrect this. I enjoyed the first one a lot.
  • Bill
    I really enjoyed the first one. Much better then most of the dreck out there.
  • RJmacready
    "...worthy of comparison to Indiana Jones and Star Wars in tone and scope." — Dude, c'mon. This is such an empty, unqualified statement. Go study up on some AO scott reviews and critical writing texts. Jesus.
  • j wizz
    The first one was a financial disaster. I personally thought it was garbage, but everyone's entitled to their opinion. I think the major issue with John Carter was the poor attempt at marketing the film.
  • Lagoya
    John Carter was total trash, I don't want to see another one.
  • The movie stunk. The only way to compare it to Star Wars is that they made the same mistake as the prequels by using too much CGI.
  • RAW_D
    Disney's John Carter wasn't without it's problems. I'm a huge fan of the original source material (which I don't think they stayed true to) and I think the main cause of failure was too much was crammed into John Carter. Had the story solely focused on John Carter mysteriously ending up on Mars WITHOUT explanation, and then the audience going along and finding out everything as he went along (rather than being SPOON FED the history of Barsoom via the ridiculous narrative) it would've worked much better. I also wonder if the movie fell victim to too many hands were in the pot regarding the script, which in my opinion usually leads to a messy and disjointed film. Anytime I see more than two people credited on a script on a movie, the movie usually was disappointing, or just plain sucks. I also think it's a major problem with how studios treat the audience these days. They think the audience is dumb, and needs to be told EVERY SINGLE THING ABOUT WHAT'S GOING ON. Apparently we're not capable of thinking for ourselves, and need them to think for us and spell out everything, thus eliminating the mystery and wonder of the universe. If I were to reboot John Carter, I would do it via an animated series or movie with the same production design in line with Frank Frazetta's original artwork. When I envision John Carter, Frank Frazetta nailed it, and I would love to see that emulated onscreen. RANT END.




Alex's Top 10 - 2016
1. La La Land
2. Paterson
3. Arrival
4. Captain Fantastic
5. 20th Cent. Women
6. Pete's Dragon
7. Jackie
8. Kubo & Two Strings
9. Everybody Wants
10. Wilderpeople
Click Here for Thoughts

Jeremy's Top 10 - 2016
1. Moonlight
2. The Handmaiden
3. High-Rise
4. Elle
5. Arrival
6. Kubo & Two Strings
7. 13th
8. Jackie
9. Toni Erdmann
10. The Witch
Click Here for Thoughts


Subscribe to our feed or daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main profile on twitter:
For the news posts only, follow this acct:
Add our feed to your Feedly: follow us in feedly