LATEST NEWS

Path of 'Guardians of the Galaxy' is Not Beholden to 'The Avengers'

by
November 14, 2014

Guardians of the Galaxy

Now that Marvel has put all their cards on the table regarding their film slate for Phase Three of their cinematic universe, we have a good idea of what all the activity regarding the Infinity Stones is leading to, especially since the next chapter in The Avengers franchise is The Avengers: Infinity War, and it will arrive in two parts in the summer of 2018 and 2019. Many are already assuming that we'll see Guardians of the Galaxy and The Avengers team up to take down Thanos after he presumably gets his hands on the Infinity Stones and the Infinity Gauntlet, however, James Gunn has indicated that may not be the case.

While participating in a small conference to promote the Blu-Ray release of Guardians of the Galaxy on December 9th, Gunn makes it sounds like  the success of the film may have given him more freedom to play in his own sandbox that isn't a slave to the events in The Avengers franchise. Gunn talks about Guardians of the Galaxy and their ties to Phase Three (via SlashFilm):

"Who knows how much we’ve influenced Phase Three but one thing is the 'Guardians' aren’t back seat to The Avengers. Captain America, Thor, those other movies, they do really support The Avengers and I think take a back seat to The Avengers. The Guardians are their own thing. The cosmic side of the universe is its own thing. And because the movie was so successful, it was more successful than Iron Man was, that changed the way other people looked at it but I still look at it the same way."

In fact, it sounds like that Guardians of the Galaxy might almost allow for a somewhat separate universe that merely has ties and influences on what happens in the franchises we've seen mostly unfold on Earth (and Asgard). Gunn addresses some of the hype recently where he mentioned some stuff about the future of Guardians of the Galaxy, and everyone assumed he was talking about another sequel. Instead, his thoughts lie on a much bigger plane:

"There was a big rash of 'James Gunn Was Thinking Of Ideas For Guardians of the Galaxy 3.' I don’t think I really said that. What I said was 'I had ideas for Guardians of the Galaxy 2. I knew what I was going to do for that, and I had ideas for beyond that.' That doesn’t necessarily mean 'Guardians of the Galaxy 3' because there are a lot of different characters in this movie that could go in a lot of different directions. And some of the characters I’m most interested in aren’t necessarily 'Guardians of the Galaxy.'"

James Gunn

But what about the ties to Infinity War? Surely that means the Guardians of the Galaxy are integral to the future of The Avengers and vice versa. Well, Gunn doesn't exactly see it that way. He reiterates and expands upon that idea to MTV:

"I don’t feel beholden to that stuff at all. I think it's really about the Guardians and what they are doing. We're not subservient to the Avengers. 'Guardians 2' is not a movie that's made to move toward 'Infinity War.' It's something that's made to move toward future cosmic movies, so I don't feel that that is something that affects me that much."

So what we might end up seeing is that stuff that happens in the Guardians of the Galaxy universe, like losing track of an Infinity Stone, may have a big impact on what happens in The Avengers universe, but the job of the cosmic franchise isn't to simply be another small piece leading up to the assembly of that superhero puzzle. Honestly, as someone who loved the characters and cosmic universe of Guardians of the Galaxy, I'm happy to hear that Marvel wants to let Gunn play in this big sandbox. It makes things feel that much more like a real comic book universe with various sects having their own stories that don't simply serve a larger storyline just for The Avengers' sake, and that's just perfect. Sound good?

Find more posts: Development, Marvel, Movie News

Discover more around the web:

Reader Feedback - 14 Comments

1

But if Thanos is warring with The Avengers for the fate of the universe, wouldn't they be aware and involved if it involves the infinity gems (or whatever)? That's common in the Marvel films of course, people asking why isn't Cap helping with Mandarin etc, but this is particularly huge isn't it? And they're closest to Thanos.

OfficialJab on Nov 14, 2014

2

He's lyyyyiiiiiing

The Walking Cuban on Nov 14, 2014

3

Avengers 3 is not till another 4-5 years so who knows what will happen till then. A lot of times they just blow smoke screens to fool the audience and keep plans secret until they know for sure that those plans will slowly come to fruition.

Rock n Rollllll on Nov 14, 2014

4

Uhm.. they know already.. they know

shane willett on Nov 18, 2014

5

Sounds great, but fans will want to see them teamed up in Infinity War. Although it would be cool for their own universe to expand, too bad it won't include the Silver Surfer and Galactus.

mooreworthy on Nov 14, 2014

6

Relax people!! There will DEFINITELY be characters from Guardians of the Galaxy in Avengers 3. You can't ignore all the tie ins (like the Collector in Thor 2)...it's gonna happen.

TheOct8pus on Nov 14, 2014

7

LOL... it will all make sense Phase 4.

Akirakorn on Nov 14, 2014

8

Phase 901 will make even more sense

shane willett on Nov 18, 2014

9

I'm excited for Phase 25, we need to get some stories on that one.

TXSteadyEddie on Nov 14, 2014

10

I Believe (beliebe?) Justin Bieber is working on a maturing to rival even that of Justin timberlake and when he's 40 all wil be forgiven as he bulks up for a role as the Grand Punisher, Frank's grandson from a reaquired Scuirrel Girl (after about a decade of the rights mistakenly being with Universal where she teams up with Phase 3 of the Monster Universe, I.e. the Wolfman, Dracula, (enemies during the Civil War) Freddy, Annabelle, and the Flying Dutchman from SpongeBob)), so yes, a 40 year old ripped Justin Bieber will play a Punisher with a giant squirrel tail.

The Walking Cuban on Nov 15, 2014

11

I see Justin Bieber as more of a She Hulk

shane willett on Nov 18, 2014

12

That gets smaller when angry. And lavender-er.

The Walking Cuban on Nov 18, 2014

13

Look at Gunn, doing a big ol' cock walk around Marvel. Haha. Bold.

DAVIDPD on Nov 14, 2014

14

Im sorry but Chris Pratt made that movie what it was - no one could have done a performance like he - he didnt look or act like StarLord - he brought himself to the role which made it more likable, believable and successful. Kudos to this film , this is a whole new step for Marvel ..

shane willett on Nov 18, 2014

Sorry, no commenting is allowed at this time.

FEATURED POSTS

POPULAR COMMENTS

LAST YEAR'S TOP 10

Alex's Top 10 - 2017
1. Call Me By Your...
2. War for Apes
3. Shape of Water
4. Florida Project
5. Dunkirk
6. Jane
7. Foxtrot
8. Faces, Places
9. Never Really Here
10. Thelma
Click Here for Thoughts

Jeremy's Top 10- 2017
1. mother!
2. Lady Bird
3. A Ghost Story
4. The Big Sick
5. Dunkirk
6. Get Out
7. Killing Sacred Deer
8. John Wick 2
9. War for Apes
10. The Beguiled
Click Here for Thoughts

FOLLOW US HERE

Subscribe to our feed or daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main profile on twitter:
For the news posts only, follow this acct:
Add our feed to your Feedly: follow us in feedly

FS.NET ON FACEBOOK