COOL STUFF

Scorsese Writes Letter About the Bright Future of Film to His Daughter

by
January 8, 2014
Source: IndieWire

Martin Scorsese

After ending 2013 with the release of The Wolf of Wall Street, director Martin Scorsese has been all over the place defending the film, talking about his career (which might be over sooner than we wish), and all things cinematic. But at some point, Scorsese decided to write a letter to his 14-year-old daughter Francesca Scorsese about the bright future of filmmaking. Scorsese talks about how the world of cinema he grew up with is coming to an end, but as he positively points out, "I’m not writing these words in a spirit of defeat. On the contrary, I think the future is bright." His full letter includes praise for great directors like Paul Thomas Anderson, Wes Anderson, Richard Linklater, David Fincher and others. Read on!

Here's Scorsese's full letter from the Italian news magazine L'Espresso (via IndieWire):

Dearest Francesca,

I’m writing this letter to you about the future. I’m looking at it through the lens of my world. Through the lens of cinema, which has been at the center of that world.

For the last few years, I’ve realized that the idea of cinema that I grew up with, that’s there in the movies I’ve been showing you since you were a child, and that was thriving when I started making pictures, is coming to a close. I’m not referring to the films that have already been made. I’m referring to the ones that are to come.

I don’t mean to be despairing. I’m not writing these words in a spirit of defeat. On the contrary, I think the future is bright.

We always knew that the movies were a business, and that the art of cinema was made possible because it aligned with business conditions. None of us who started in the 60s and 70s had any illusions on that front. We knew that we would have to work hard to protect what we loved. We also knew that we might have to go through some rough periods. And I suppose we realized, on some level, that we might face a time when every inconvenient or unpredictable element in the moviemaking process would be minimized, maybe even eliminated. The most unpredictable element of all? Cinema. And the people who make it.

I don’t want to repeat what has been said and written by so many others before me, about all the changes in the business, and I’m heartened by the exceptions to the overall trend in moviemaking – Wes Anderson, Richard Linklater, David Fincher, Alexander Payne, the Coen Brothers, James Gray and Paul Thomas Anderson are all managing to get pictures made, and Paul not only got The Master made in 70mm, he even got it shown that way in a few cities. Anyone who cares about cinema should be thankful.

And I’m also moved by the artists who are continuing to get their pictures made all over the world, in France, in South Korea, in England, in Japan, in Africa. It’s getting harder all the time, but they’re getting the films done.

But I don’t think I’m being pessimistic when I say that the art of cinema and the movie business are now at a crossroads. Audio-visual entertainment and what we know as cinema – moving pictures conceived by individuals – appear to be headed in different directions. In the future, you’ll probably see less and less of what we recognize as cinema on multiplex screens and more and more of it in smaller theaters, online, and, I suppose, in spaces and circumstances that I can’t predict.

So why is the future so bright? Because for the very first time in the history of the art form, movies really can be made for very little money. This was unheard of when I was growing up, and extremely low budget movies have always been the exception rather than the rule. Now, it’s the reverse. You can get beautiful images with affordable cameras. You can record sound. You can edit and mix and color-correct at home. This has all come to pass.

But with all the attention paid to the machinery of making movies and to the advances in technology that have led to this revolution in moviemaking, there is one important thing to remember: the tools don’t make the movie, you make the movie. It’s freeing to pick up a camera and start shooting and then put it together with Final Cut Pro. Making a movie – the one you need to make - is something else. There are no shortcuts.

If John Cassavetes, my friend and mentor, were alive today, he would certainly be using all the equipment that’s available. But he would be saying the same things he always said – you have to be absolutely dedicated to the work, you have to give everything of yourself, and you have to protect the spark of connection that drove you to make the picture in the first place. You have to protect it with your life. In the past, because making movies was so expensive, we had to protect against exhaustion and compromise. In the future, you’ll have to steel yourself against something else: the temptation to go with the flow, and allow the movie to drift and float away.

This isn’t just a matter of cinema. There are no shortcuts to anything. I’m not saying that everything has to be difficult. I’m saying that the voice that sparks you is your voice – that’s the inner light, as the Quakers put it.

That’s you. That’s the truth.

All my love,

Dad

That's pretty damn touching, and should be a lesson to anyone that thinks cinema is in decline. While the studios are certainly having trouble coming up with decent films that aren't based on previously established intellectual property, the world of independent film is growing all the time, and those movies are becoming more and more prominent with easy ways to watch anywhere in the world. As long as filmmakers have a vision and a voice, there will always be good cinema. As Scorsese's friends and colleagues Steven Spielberg and George Lucas have predicted, there's likely a big change in the studio system coming, and Hollywood will be shaken up pretty violently. But good filmmaking and storytelling will always survive. Thoughts?

Find more posts in Cool Stuff, Hype

Discover more on ZergNet:

  • Ehsan Davodi
    AT LEAST he didn't give up like David Lynch or didn't make forgettable works like Woody Allen or didn't want make wtf sequels like James Cameron. TRUE MASTER ..... IMMORTAL SYMBOL
    • Mike P.
      That's a bit harsh. David Lynch hasn't made anything because he hasn't felt the need to, felt the desire in anything he has come across. Woody Allen also has been making a film a year for decades now -- that's impressive in itself, and not something even a handful of fantastic filmmakers can say. Cameron is pushing new technologies that may or may not be the future of hollywood. That I don't know enough about to speak on. But they're all great filmmakers.
  • Jeff Baumann
    36 movies. 36 countries. 36 languages. 362020.com

FEATURED POSTS

GET MORE NEWS

Subscribe to our feed or daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main profile on twitter:
For the news posts only, follow this acct:
Add our feed to your Feedly: follow us in feedly
Subscribe to me on YouTube for interviews 

POPULAR COMMENTS

NEWEST PODCAST

FACEBOOK + LINKS