REVIEWS

Review: Jordan Vogt-Roberts' 'Kong: Skull Island' is Awesomely Weird

by
March 10, 2017

Kong: Skull Island

Kong is back, and the beast has never been this vicious. Since the 1933 classic, King Kong, the cinematic variations on the creature have been as varied as they are impressively crafted by the film world's latest technology. The stories surrounding humans trekking to his home, Skull Island, have twirled about similar predicaments, though: they venture to the island, encounter the impressive Kong, kidnap him for display in the world of man. The giant ape deserves a shot of adrenaline, and it's director Jordan Vogt-Roberts who has come in to deliver that shot. Kong: Skull Island is a thrilling entry into the storied franchise and not only in expected ways. With energetic pacing and breathtaking visuals the film satisfies on the typical levels, but Skull Island also drops in a bit of weirdness that easily sets it apart from modern monster movies.

For instance the setting detours from the classic, Kong tale. Set in 1973, Skull Island takes place during the final days of the Vietnam war, troops in Southeast Asia already planning the return to their homeland. That ends up not being the case for a particular squadron of soldiers, though, as they've just been given one, last mission. Led by Colonel Packard (Samuel L. Jackson), the squad is to helicopter a group of explorers to an uncharted island. In charge of the expedition is William Randa (John Goodman), a high-level official of the Monarch organization and a man who believes this mysterious island holds countless and ancient wonders that could be beneficial to the US' placement in the world. Also along for the ride is a former pilot for the British SAS turned tracker/mercenary (Tom Hiddleston) and a photojournalist (Brie Larson).

What the expedition discovers on Skull Island is anything but what they're expecting, though, as the squad of helicopters quickly becomes scrap metal when immediately faced with the 100-ft tall beast. The survivors, armed but completely out of their element, must travel through the jungle of Skull Island encountering all manner of strange and ancient creature all the while knowing the king of the island, Kong, could be just around the corner. And that isn't even getting into the terrifying things lurking under the island's surface.

Kong: Skull Island Review

Though it didn't work as well as expected for the first King Kong remake in 1976, transplanting the story to a different time is one of the nice ways it's all kept fresh in Skull Island. Having the humans who encounter the dangers of the island be American troops completely opens the doorway for the adventure level and action that takes place within. Vogt-Roberts keeps the pacing of the film at a constant high with plenty of opportunities being met to flesh out the human characters along the way. They're never quite as interesting as the eponymous giant at the center of the story, but that is to be the case any time there's a new King Kong adventure to be told.

The director and his team of screenwriters here do an amazing job developing the island and its inhabitants. Even though it isn't exactly a new location for this series, the creatures found there are ripe with potential, something the filmmakers of Skull Island never let slip by as a missed opportunity. Around ever rocky cliff and cluster of trees lies another creature that is often as creative as it is terrifying, the latter element having a heavy hand in Skull Island's ability to keep those endless thrills at a horrifying level. Luckily Vogt-Roberts' handling of tone is superb, and the film ends up having you cringe in your seat with as much effortless ability as it has you losing control from laughter.

This also gives the film a strong edge in handling the absurdity of it all, something else that clearly doesn't escape the director's vision. Vogt-Roberts injects that shot of adrenaline into Kong's universe, but he does so with an added drip of the strange and unbelievable. It's the strangeness that has you amped for Jackson's Captain Ahab level of obsession or Goodman's abilities as the creepy businessman. Vogt-Roberts flashes the inspirations for his film with the subtlety of… well, a 100-ft gorilla, but each one is more satisfyingly perfect than the last. He's the first filmmaker to work a visual reference to Cannibal Holocaust into a blockbuster epic, and there has to be some level of admiration for that alone.

Kong: Skull Island Review

Nearly everyone in the cast appears to be on the same level as their director in terms of big-budget lunacy, Hiddleston and Larson as the leads notwithstanding. It isn't that they each give bad performances here. Far from it. It's just that the straight nature of their lead characters makes the eccentricities of the secondary performances stand out all the more. Jackson and Goodman are both superbly comical here, each delivering a performance that is foreboding and over the top. Elsewhere in the cast we find Shea Whigham as a Captain in the squad, the actor giving his war-time clich├ęs a breath of nuanced, fresh air. Riding highest among the cast is John C. Reilly, though, as a World War II pilot who has been stranded on the island for nearly 30 years. The comic actor gives his character a nice brush of hilarity with each, delivered line, and he ends up personifying Skull Island's attitude best.

With heaps of over-the-top visuals and breathtaking excitement, Skull Island is yet another impressive depiction of King Kong and his dangerous home. Thankfully, director Jordan Vogt-Roberts isn't satisfied with only that, and his entry into the Kong franchise is all the more memorable due to its own eccentricities. Such a breath of fresh air is needed in this day and age of endless epics with gigantic, digital creations interacting with awesomely detailed environments. Kong: Skull Island offers a boat-load of fun for die-hard fans of classic, monster movies of old while still remaining effortlessly fresh for those same fans. It's exactly what's needed for the modern blockbuster.

Find more posts in Review, SciFi

Discover more around the web:

Loading...
  • Jon Odishaw
    Didn't care for it. I was so excited and so let down.
    • Brandon Cole
      All I was thinking about was going home x watching Peter Jackson's King Kong ha.
      • Jon Odishaw
        I really do like that version. This one had all the elements. They were just thrown together poorly.
        • Brandon Cole
          I agree!
  • Rage72
    It was awesome! Best Kong yet!
  • DAVIDPD
    Another feature that will take months to get to my local cinema...I really am excited to this one!
  • ion677
    Almost left the theater multiple times. I was just so bored, didn't like any of the characters (including Kong), and couldn't stop thinking about how much better Peter Jacksons version is.
    • mariusica
      Didn't want to leave, but I admit I got bored about halfway thru. Then expectation were never met. I wish I hadn't watched the 2005 version again on Netflix this year. That was a masterpiece...
      • SillySock
        50% audience score at RT...lol Real masterpiece
        • Moe
          The 50% that didn't like it are 'unique' individuals indeed... and of the consensus was a 50% score, well, that is just odd...
          • SillySock
            50% is unique? That makes zero sense...50% would constitute whats known as an "average"...lol
          • Moe
            Sorry. I did articulate my point well enough. What I mean I that is it is a fantastic so the people who did not enjoy it are 'unique'...
        • mariusica
          That score has no meaning if you look at 78% liking Jurassic World...
          • SillySock
            But your score matters....lol It's a statistical measurement that means far more than ONE person's opinion.
          • mariusica
            I was saying the RT audience scores are too biased. That movie was 3h long and not for everyone, so I understand the split votes.. Metacritic for it is still over 80% (!), 7.3 audience score, A- CinemaScore.
          • SillySock
            how are they biased? They either liked it or they didn't. whose opinion ISNT biased?
        • To be fair, 50% isn't a bad rating. That means 50% liked it and 50% didn't. Who's right and who's wrong? It's all a matter of taste. I personaly think that divisive movies are good candidate to become classics. I didn't watch it yet, so I can't tell if I would join the 50% fresh or the 50% rotten side.
          • SillySock
            That's a Rotten...end of discussion
  • SillySock
    Sweet...this looks so much better than the crap Peter Hackson made
    • LightningB
      Glad I'm not the only one who feels that way about Jackson's take. Visually it is amazing but it is a boring story (even with it being one we already knew), dumb dialogue and an hour way too long. It was bad everywhere except in it's look. 1933 New York looked amazing.
  • mariusica
    This is too short
  • Tester
    I am conflicted, I would like to see this movie but you guys are split down the middle. On one hand some liked it, on the hand some thought it was boring.. but then you go and compared to the great Jackson version which I thought was complete crap. What do to !!
    • Bo
      Go see it and come to your own conclusions? Just a thought. Peace.
  • Jon Odishaw
    Peter Jackson's Kong was a more likeable character than any on this film. Aside from John C Reilly of course.
  • RAW_D
    Once Peter Jacksons Kong reached New York, the movie got long and boring.
    • You're too kind. It started to derail way before, with the overstretched and soulless fight and chase scenes in the jungle. It was like Peter has found a bag full of cash at his door with a note saying: I challenge you to spend them all before next week.
      • Brandon Cole
        The overstretched and soulless fights were better than everything in this version lol.
        • I have to check it out, but I can believe you. Hollywood no longer knows how to make a movie with a compelling story. Assassin's Creed was ruined by a story written probably on a napkin during a drinking bout. A shame, because there is so much to tell and to see. In nowadays movies great and memorable dialogues became so rare.
  • RAW_D
    Is it worth the price of admission? Maaaaayyyybbbeee.... ?
  • DanShaw
    You need to learn how commas work
  • Wayne
    If you see this movie, see it is IMAX 3D, it is an amazing ride.

FEATURED POSTS

POPULAR COMMENTS

LAST YEAR'S TOP 10

Alex's Top 10 - 2016
1. La La Land
2. Paterson
3. Arrival
4. Captain Fantastic
5. 20th Cent. Women
6. Pete's Dragon
7. Jackie
8. Kubo & Two Strings
9. Everybody Wants
10. Wilderpeople
Click Here for Thoughts

Jeremy's Top 10 - 2016
1. Moonlight
2. The Handmaiden
3. High-Rise
4. Elle
5. Arrival
6. Kubo & Two Strings
7. 13th
8. Jackie
9. Toni Erdmann
10. The Witch
Click Here for Thoughts

FOLLOW US HERE

Subscribe to our feed or daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main profile on twitter:
For the news posts only, follow this acct:
Add our feed to your Feedly: follow us in feedly

FS.NET ON FACEBOOK