Josh's Review: Alpha Dog Not the Leader of the Pack

January 15, 2007

Based on true events that led to the capture of Jesse James Hollywood, a drug dealer who became one of the youngest men ever on the FBI's most wanted list, Alpha Dog depicts the brutal lifestyle of some "gangster white boys" in California. The plot centers around the awkward kidnapping of Zack Mazursky (Anton Yelchin) from his family in order to force his brother Jake Mazursky (Ben Foster) to pay back money that he owes drug lord Johnny Truelove (Emile Hirsch). There are plenty of other stars packed in the film including Sharon Stone, Bruce Willis, and new comer Justin Timberlake.

I have very mixed feelings about Alpha Dog. I feel like somewhere in it there was a great film. The movie acts almost like a bastard son of a documentary, showing interviews with specific characters and giving specific information while trying to wrap itself around a narrative structured story. I admire director Nick Cassavetes for trying to keep a realistic feeling with the interviews and facts, but this element is used at very random times in the movie which causes the film to have almost no specific structure at all. It takes away from the narrative story, which is what the audience is emotionally invested for the majority of the film. The movie starts off way too slow, which should have instead been spent to build a solid amount of character development. The film rather uses its 40 minute epilogue to showcase all the characters getting stoned and pooping in each others living rooms.

Bad boys Johnny Truelove (Emile Hirsch) and Frankie (Justin Timberlake) discussing plans in Alpha Dog.Alpha Dog Review

The acting is over the top, in a bad way - I don't understand the direction Cassavetes was trying to go with the acting. Once again, this takes away from any realism the film tries to grasp. The terrible dialogue didn't help with the actors performances either. There are some notable performances that stand out greatly when compared to the rest in the film. Mainly from Anton Yelchin who plays the 15 year old kid who gets kidnapped. He gives a very likeable performance to a character that really enjoys the life of being kidnapped. Justin Timberlake also gives a very refreshing performance - after 15 minutes in you will forget that he is the one who brought sexy back.

Spoiler Alert! Apart from the bad directing, acting, and dialogue, there is one scene that really hit me in the film. The scene involves the suggested murder of Zack Mazursky in the desert. This is the only scene in the film that had any sort of purpose to retell this true life story. There is actual tension and depth between the characters and the outcome of the scene is brutally honest and impressive.

Kidnapped Zack Mazursky (Anton Yelchin) and his female attraction Julie (Amanda Seyfried) in a scene from Alpha Dog.Alpha Dog Review

Last Word:
There are many factors as to why I am not too impressed with Alpha Dog. The one element that I have saved until now to mention in regards to why I disliked it is the fact that there seemed to be absolutely no reason to tell this story. Why invest in making a film, especially a supposedly true story like this one, and not have any message to convey or feelings to express on the issue? With a real life story this compelling and unique it deserves to have a much better film made that is based off of it.

Find more posts: Movie Reviews



I saw this film last night and i agree with the "spoiler alert" the best part of the movie (as far as acting was concerned) was the death of the main character. i was truly upset and other people in the theater were crying. I loved Emile Hirsh because i have ALWAYS been a fan of his (check him out in Imaginary Heroes if you really want to see him be amazing) I think Tony Scott should have directed it. he could have REALLY taken this film much farther then Cassavetes. I also agree about Anton Yelchin and Justin Timberlake (especially both of them in the afore mentioned desert scene). They actually did quite a good job. I hope to see more of Anton soon.

Emily on Jan 18, 2007


I don't completely agree with Josh's opinion on this. Although I wouldn't give it higher than an 8, I thought it was much better than he states. My own biggest problem was that I thought it was over-edited. It's been sitting around for nearly 2 years after it debuted at Sundance in January 2005, and I think Cassavetes was working on it, trying to tweak it for broader audiences, but unfortunately took too much away from what was (I assume) a naturally better film at Sundance. However, to each his own opinion - and I did love JT, Emile, and Anton.

Alex Billington on Jan 18, 2007


I also agree, there were too many cut scenes between dates in time in this film clearly depicted the appearance of "american white gangsters", supported the backgrounds of each character and had great control over the emotional dialogue, throughout. The tell tale truth of Jesse James Hollywood in these particular events in history were shocking and crucial as evidence of lives that exists today. Even though I spent 1 hour and 45 minutes (out of the 2 hour film, too long for this story) asking myself, "What the hell is gonna happen next? When is someone gonna die??". The climax was driven and I was left in awe. The acting was for sure a mere 6/10. But I was satisfied with about 75% of this film. 7/10. I think the film has more of an impact by using fewer big name celebs. In turn, sacrificed the acting. But still, not a bad production (Cassavetes!). Oh yeah, and best scene? Definately when Jake shows up at that party and kicks the sh*t out of a few guys. Intense.

jt on May 22, 2007

New comments are no longer allowed on this post.



Subscribe to our feed or daily newsletter:

Follow Alex's main account on Twitter:

For only the latest posts - follow this:

Add our posts to your Feedlyclick here

Get all the news sent on Telegram Telegram