Jaq's Review: Fool's Gold - Not So Hidden Treasure

February 8, 2008

There's something about an underwater treasure hunt that gets my blood pumping. It brings out the pirate in me. Show me a film with promises of buried gold, shipwrecks and archaeological history and I'm first in line. Thankfully, Fool's Gold delivers. Mostly. Yes, there are chests of gold and sunken boats but there are also a few too many coincidences, silly dialogue and some weak performances.

The film opens with treasure hunter Finn (Matthew McConaughey) and his partner Alfonz (Ewen Bremner) discovering the missing piece of a jigsaw puzzle, which, we will find out, has been plaguing Finn for many years. Of course, we don't understand the significance of the shard of a plate, not yet, but that's part of what works in Fool's Gold. It's a mystery and it takes almost the whole two hours of the film to completely unravel.

McConaughey attempts to rekindle the love of his ex-wife Hudson in Fool's Gold.Fool's Gold Review

One of the keys to solving it, though, is Finn's ex-wife Tess (Kate Hudson), an oceanic historian who stopped working on her doctorate when she met and married the irrepressible Finn. When we first meet her, she's taken a position on a luxury yacht as a steward and is doing everything she can to get away from Finn.

So far, everything sounds a bit disconnected, I know, and this is where the coincidences come in. All of these little pieces, along with a few others, come together to complete a plot which isn't all that convoluted but does stretch to a bit of the incredulous. Finn ends up on board the yacht, which is owned by multi-millionaire Nigel Honeycutt (Donald Sutherland), after rescuing the hat of Gemma (Alexis Dziena), the millionaire's debutante daughter. He then convinces Honeycutt to fund the treasure hunt. See how everything is falling nicely into place? Furthermore, the island where the treasure is allegedly buried is owned by a gangster rapper named Bigg Bunny (Kevin Hart) to whom Finn owes money and who therefore wants Finn dead.

So what needs to happen is Finn must find the treasure, take care of Bigg Bunny, reconcile with his wife and show the millionaires there's more to life than just being a ditz. And this he does. The problem, of course, is that since Finn wins (and I'm not spoiling anything here, his winning is never in doubt) by being Finn, he never changes, never learns anything from his adventures. When his wife comes back, she must relinquish all of her own self-esteem and desires to take her man as he is or not at all.

Matthew McConaughey doing what he does best - showin' off his muscles and gettin' the ladies, especially in Fool's Gold.Fool's Gold Review

McConaughey is in surfer mode as Finn, giving him a light, superhero-style quality the film needs in order to balance Hudson's scholar. Both performances are serviceable but Sutherland plays Honeycutt as if he's sleepwalking through an English drawing room.

Where the writers, John Claflin, Daniel Zelman and director Andy Tennant, do a good job, however, is in setting up the mystery itself. They spend the time needed so the audience understands the allure of naval treasure hunting and why the sea holds so many mysteries. In the end, we are given a light-hearted comedy with a fun bit of action and, if we don't think about it too much, a pleasant way to spend two hours.

Find more posts: Movie Reviews



National Treasure: Fools Gold? I am wondering how you can give this movie 7/10

Heckle on Feb 8, 2008


From the previews it looked a lot worse than a 7/10

Alfredo on Feb 8, 2008


Jeez. First comment is a jab at Jaq yet again. Can we end the childish crap? I'm actually looking forward to taking my wife to this; something we could probably both enjoy, without it being a "chick flick".

Nicholas on Feb 8, 2008


Thanks Nicholas! And yeah, it's not a chick flick and quite fun (taking those other comments into consideration). The friend I took to the screening loved it and couldn't wait to take his wife.

Jaq on Feb 8, 2008


7 huh? That means this film is 75% better than There Will Be Blood. I smell an Oscar!

Nick on Feb 8, 2008


After seeing the movie, I'd have to say I had pretty low expectations for it, and was actually proven wrong, as it was a good movie. Everyone I've talked to thats seen it has agreed as well, it seems like it gets a bit of a bad rap but its liked by the general census.

Dustin on Feb 15, 2008


I have to admit that I was pretty surprised, I think this movie was good.

Mike on Jan 9, 2009


I disagree slightly with the Rating above. 7 is too high

affilrev on Jan 15, 2010

New comments are no longer allowed on this post.



Subscribe to our feed or daily newsletter:

Follow Alex's main account on Twitter:

For only the latest posts - follow this:

Add our posts to your Feedlyclick here

Get all the news sent on Telegram Telegram