Ken's Review: Jumper - A Great Concept Destroyed by Weak Performances

February 15, 2008

Everyone I know has said the same thing about Jumper, "Either it's going to really suck, or it's going to be really awesome". When I first saw the trailer I'll admit I was intrigued by the thought of a teleporting superhero. That is until I saw who would be playing the lead character. Putting my dislike for Hayden Christensen aside, I thought maybe since it starts with a cool concept and since the special effects look decent, perhaps it might be a winner. Although the concept and effects turned out to be actually pretty great, they couldn't make up for everything else that brought the film down.

Jumper starts off by introducing us to David Rice (Hayden Christensen), a student in high school. He is a normal kid dealing with all the normal high school stuff, including a crush on his classmate Millie. David is unaware of his power until one day while walking on a frozen lake he falls in. He is only under the freezing water for a few seconds until he suddenly teleports and finds himself in the local library. Quickly realizing the potential of his newly found gift he runs away from home. Jumping to years later David has used his gift for selfish enjoyment and personal gain. He has also caught the eye of a group led by a man named Roland (Samuel L. Jackson), who will stop at nothing to kill anyone that can teleport. When Millie's (Rachel Bilson) life is threatened David must choose between saving his own skin or possibly sacrificing himself for her.

David and his new friend Griffin must fight off the Paladins who want them dead in Jumper.Jumper Review

A few of the casting decisions just didn't work for me. The first poor choice was having Rachel Bilson as Millie. The only other thing that I have seen her in was The Last Kiss which she wasn't that bad in, but she really wasn't very good either. I felt like this was kind of the same thing, where she definitely wasn't bad, but was never that great. She seemed a bit boring and rigid like she didn't really know what she was doing.

If Bilson is mediocre then Hayden Christensen must just be plain bad. The film starts with a younger version of David played by Max Thieriot. As soon as Christiansen comes into the picture and starts interacting with others I wished Thieriot would come back and somehow play the older version as well. If this was more like Soldier where the lead character never really had to talk or have relationships with other characters, then Christiansen would be fine. If all he did was teleport and fight, then I wouldn't have had a problem with him, anything deeper then that and he falls apart. There is just something about him that is awkward when he interacts with Bilson and the other jumper, Griffin (Jamie Bell), who can also teleport. Hayden's body language feels out of place for each situation, which is very distracting. There is a lot of swaying and eyes darting everywhere, like he doesn't know what to do with himself. He is very wooden and extremely uninteresting.

The screenplay, which is based off of a novel by Steven Gould (check it out on, was written by David Goyer, Jim Uhls and Simon Kinberg. Now I don't know which guy had more influence or which ideas can be attributed to which writer, but there were some definite problems. The biggest one for me is when Hayden is attacked the first time by Samuel Jackson. That scene was actually pretty good, however after being attacked Christensen decides that instead of hiding or trying to figure out why he had been assaulted, he instead tries to find his old high school crush and go on a romantic vacation. That whole decision bothered me the entire film because it lacked any common sense on how a person would really react to being attacked and almost killed by a mysterious intruder.

Hayden Christensen and Rachel Bilson make up the two "boring and rigid" and "wooden and extremely uninteresting" performances in Jumper.Jumper Review

There were a few ideas that were introduced but never developed into much, such as the war between the "Paladins" and "Jumpers". The "Paladins", which Sam Jackson's character is a part of, have been around since medieval times trying to kill the "Jumpers". That information is about all the audience ever learns, but was enough to intrigue me. It sounds like such a great foundation to build a cool sci-fi series on, reminiscent of Underworld or even The Matrix. Take that foundation and replace a few actors, fill in a few holes and you could have a great trilogy, especially if you throw in the teleport fighting that Jamie Bell uses on the "Paladin" troops. Those scenes were great and could really be developed in a few sequels.

As it stands now I didn't care much for Jumper and wouldn't recommend a sequel, as much as they left it open for one. The unique concept, great looking special effects, and teleport fighting just couldn't make up for the disappointing performances by Christensen and Bilson. If you actually enjoy watching Christensen then you will probably like Jumper, especially since he is the same in every film. This is a mediocre movie that will quickly be forgotten until you see it on the $9.99 rack, which I predict won't take long for it to get there. Skip Jumper this weekend and instead try and find a theater showing In Bruges which you'll find much more rewarding.

Find more posts: Movie Reviews



Great review! Your take on movies and the way you write so clearly about performance, pacing and plot directions seem to be just the way I would have thought about this movie. I will continue to watch for your reviews before heading to the theater. Thanks!

HT on Feb 16, 2008


I know it's still very early in the year---but I seriously think we may already have the winner for RAZZIE of the year 2008 with this movie. Certainly as a screen couple--they are a shoo-in.

Janet on Feb 16, 2008


wrong wrong wrong...guess your opinion is just that. I had a blast. so did the entire theatre...they wanted to be David. So did I - there was an honesty in having David exploit his transporting abilities and do what we probably all would do - find a way to live laviously without working for it. as David says - Hayden in voiceover - "C'mon - what would YOU do?" Just imagine - which obviously you can't - anywhere IS possible. I thought Hayden and Rachel had great chemistry, were believable in a fantasy concept, and no one does bad ass MO FO like SLJ. Great chemistry by all the players - esp Hayden and SLJ (not once to you think of SW / Anakin / Mace), Hayden and the loved by the camera Rachel but also between Hayden and Jamie. After that race scene in Tokyo, which takes place close to the end of the film, I found myself going way over the speed limit in my VW with a stick. Never felt so cool in a manual gear shift. Seeing in again - only this time in a theatre that cares about its customers. - the one I saw it in had terrible sound system. I hear the digital presentation is best way to see it - but then digital is always better.

taikwan on Feb 16, 2008


I loved it, cant wait for the next installment.

Richard on Feb 16, 2008


Good Review. Spot on. Rachel was easily the weakest link in Last Kiss and she would have been here, if Hayden weren't the lead. The only decent Hayden performances I've seen are in 'Life as a House' and 'Higher Ground'. He's just gotten worse and worse from then on. But the tweens will love it cause Rachel and Hayden are just so hot ya know. *Sigh* This movie had so much potential.

Erin on Feb 17, 2008


Oh.. though I must add. Jamie Bell did a great job. They did a good job in casting with him.

Erin on Feb 17, 2008


I agree Ken. It was a great concept in a story that went no where. There was so much they could have done and didnt do. There was a great chance for a battle between the paladins and jumpers and we werent left with a winner or a loser. Terrible ending.

Heckle on Feb 17, 2008


plain movie. Everything is just plain, fighting scenes are not even close to Bourne series' excitement.. i enjoyed the movie though, but i had to drop my expectation a few bars to enjoy it.

arief on Feb 19, 2008


Your review is pretty much spot on. Neat concept, clever SPFX, poor screenplay, awful casting and the most obvious "bring on the sequel" ending yet devised. Hard to believe this was helmed by the same guy who steered the Bourne Identity, but I guess even a good director can't overcome bad actors and a screenplay gaping with SUV-sized plot holes. And WTF was up with lifting the end-title music from the Bourne Series and using it for this movie? Our only hope of escaping several regurgitations of Jumper is if it loses money big time at the box office and at the rental stores. But, given the unfathomable popularity of the insipid Spiderman and Fantastic Four franchises, it's more likely the film will be a "hit."

Garland on Feb 22, 2008

New comments are no longer allowed on this post.



Subscribe to our feed or daily newsletter:

Follow Alex's main account on Twitter:

For only the latest posts - follow this:

Add our posts to your Feedlyclick here

Get all the news sent on Telegram Telegram