Kevin's Review: Doomsday - Neil Marshall's Growing Pains

March 15, 2008

Neil Marshall's 2006 horror hit, The Descent, will undoubtedly maintain its place on many a fan's top list for years and years to come. The spelunking terror tail was so perfect and delicate in its execution that it set Marshall's career afire and created a palpable fear of caves the same way Jaws did for open-ocean swimming. Sadly, Marshall's follow up, Doomsday, carries over little of the intelligence and artfulness the UK-born writer and director has quickly become known for. Instead, it's almost as if Doomsday is Marshall working his way through a tapas bar trying out a bunch of different foods - the film lacking any real focus and being comprised of many genres that Marshall seems to be "tasting" for the first time. The result is a flavorful, but perplexing and derivative mess that I hope the promising moviemaker doesn't repeat.

From the marketing, Doomsday already has a familiar taste to it. You have a deadly viral outbreak in Scotland that prompts the government to quarantine off the entire country, leaving the infected to die. After thirty-some years, the government sends a team into the "hot zone" to investigate a possible cure, headed by British hottie Rhona Mitra who plays Major Eden. Hhmm…sounds a bit like Resident Evil or 28 Weeks Later. Unlike these familiar films, however, the infected don't actually turn into ravenous undead. Rather, they seem to form a chaotic society of cannibals, replete with tattoos, mohawks and their own psychotic, tribal form of governing. Mad Max or Escape from New York come to mind?

The stunning Rhona Mitra stars as Eden Sinclair in the post-apocalyptic action thriller Doomsday.Doomsday Review

This patchwork and familiarity unfortunately continues throughout the film. While Sol (Craig Conway) leads the insane populace of people-eaters that have taken over the inner cities, Kane (Malcolm McDowell) heads a rival sect that has retreated to the county sides, occupying old Scottish castles and assuming a medieval lifestyle ala King Arthur, complete with leather garb, horses and armor.

Odd juxtapositions, to be sure, and they ultimately don't work. The drastic shifts in environments don't make a lot of sense, and feel totally out of place. This goes for a chase sequence, as well, which immediately follows the scene of Kane's feudal empire. We go from riding on horses to cruising down the highway in a Bentley - a scene that seems right at home in Michael Bay's Bad Boys.

There are many such "huh?" moments in Doomsday. As Marshall pieces together the film from other material and ideas, there are gaping holes in the plot you just have to let go. For instance, how exactly can a 500+ horsepower Bentley Continental not out run some jerry-rigged jalopy that Sol and his thugs have menacingly decked out with bones and body parts? Or, you might ask why the Reaper virus sounds familiar. It should. The virus in Blade II is of the same name, though the two have nothing to do with each other. I don't want to give too much away, but it's safe to say you'll ask yourself similar questions throughout the film. One will probably be, "Hey, I thought this was supposed to be more of a horror flick?" Sorry to say, but it's not. Doomsday is better categorized as blood-filled action.

Doomsday is set partially in the post-apocalyptic wastelands of the UK.Doomsday Review

Despite the numerous and varied shortcomings, I feel like giving Marshall a pass on this. Even with his scattershot approach, I still very much enjoyed Doomsday. The film certainly lacks any degree of consistency of wholeness, but Marshall's blood work and cinematography is top-notch and ever-present. Not only that, Marshall is a pretty young filmmaker, which is why it seems Doomsday is more of a fleeting exercise in testing his interests and limits than it is representative of where he's going. Thankfully, Marshall is slated next to write and direct a horror flick called Sacrilege, which is more in line with The Descent. It's best to just chalk Doomsday up to something akin to adolescent experimentation. Experimenting can be fun, as it is here, as long as it doesn't become a habit.

(And as some might be interested, yes, the Hulk trailer did appear in front of the film. Interestingly, it's not 100% the same trailer we brought you earlier this week. At the tail end of the clip, there's a close-up shot of the Hulk's face, which is pretty nifty.)

Find more posts: Movie Reviews



Kinda figured it would be a lame movie. I saw that girl-on-girl fighting clip and it had some awful choreography. And besides... tattoos and mohawks in a post-apocalyptic society? C'mon that was 80's fare. Unless you're making a satire of that kind of movie it just won't work in our present day and age.

Alfredo on Mar 15, 2008


thanks for the compliments, Andrei. and as for a quote, run that by Alex if you could.

kevin powers on Mar 16, 2008


Good review. Now I can spare the time to go to watch this film!

Marco Milone on Mar 17, 2008


This doesn't excite me, which is a shame as I like Neil's work. The Descent was good but his finest work is Dog Soldiers. The script is so tight and entertaining I think he's gone slightly downhill since then.

Payne by name on Mar 17, 2008


I just saw this tonight and Kevin is dead on with his review. It really was only a 5/10. First off, the editing was AWFUL! I couldn't stand it, it was just flashing cuts every half-second. Second, it was just a big mess of all kinds of weird things. From a medieval castle and Gladiator-like fights to Mad Max car chases to futuristic action. Really confusing and weird. I'd have to say... Nice try Neil Marshall, but stick with horror.

Alex Billington on Mar 18, 2008


it was a lot fun to watch and Rhona Mitra was smoking hot in it also i was kind of fun to see some of the cast from Dog Soldiers be apart of it. Though the whole going from normal civilization to punk rock era to medieval was way confusing and kinda dumb it was like i was watching Lord of the Rings. Overall it was a lot of fun to watch and it will be for you if you don't think to much.

Curtis on Mar 20, 2008


Good review but what about the cinematography? The action? The acting?

Mrbobbyboy on Mar 20, 2008

New comments are no longer allowed on this post.



Subscribe to our feed -or- daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main account on twitter:
For the latest posts only - follow this one:

Add our updates to your Feedly - click here

Get the latest posts sent in Telegram Telegram