Notorious Will Be Anything But - B.I.G.'s Actor Revealed

March 17, 2008
Source: Wayne Barrow's Notorious Blog

Notorious B.I.G.

Despite what seems like a broad disinterest in Fox's new film NOTORIOUS among my peers, my curiosity is slightly peeked with the news that the film is set to begin principal photography next week, being that the studio has finally found an actor that can fill the large - and I mean large - shoes of the late Christopher Wallace, aka The Notorious B.I.G. - a young, new Jamal Woolard (pictured right in the image above). He certainly has the look, which is near the most important attribute to get right. It's hard to fake 6'3" and 350+ pounds. Despite the moniker, I have a feeling this film is going to be anything but notorious.

Jamal Woolard as Notorious B.I.G.Most probably recall the rapper's infamous career and early death. A still-unknown assailant murdered Wallace in 1997 in Los Angeles in a drive-by shooting. The late 24 year-old had a fascinating history by most accounts. However, I don't think much of what a lot of people deem the "juicy details" will be brought out in the movie. Wallace's mother, Voletta, is receiving a producer's credit, so I can't imagine a controversial light being cast on her late son.

NY Mag supports this watering down theory as well. After reading the script for the biopic last month, they say that "Notorious — on paper, at least — plays like a loose-knit highlight reel; it's basically the screenplay adaptation of Biggie's Wikipedia entry…there's no real explanation given for how he went from enthusiastic fan to one of hip-hop's all-time…by page 30, he's signed to Puffy's label, and from there it's a mad, tensionless dash to the end." This doesn't exactly have the depth and investigation we'd expect from such a well-known artist whose murder is still unsolved. I'm sorry, but there's little escaping an eye towards that little detail.

Other combustible details you can expect won't be included in the film, as well, pertain to Wallace and Sean Combs' feud with fellow rapper Tupac Shakur. Consider this intriguing scenario: At a high level you have the kings of rap from the West coast and East coast in an ongoing reportedly violent feud with one another; in September 1996 one is killed in a drive-by shooting, while the other is murdered in the same manner almost six months later; both crimes are still unsolved. As they say, you can't make this stuff up.

However, apparently one guy can, if you believe Wallace's camp. How coincidental it is that Chuck Phillips of the LA Times runs with a story today speculating more strongly than ever the violent link between Christopher Wallace, Sean Combs, and Tupac Shakur. Specifically, Phillips, who has reported on the two rappers' history for a long time, suggests that Wallace and Combs knew Shakur was going to be attacked in 1994. The burgeoning rapper was jumped outside of a New York studio and suffered five gun shot wounds. Wallace's mother and fellow associates say this is untrue, of course. Regardless, Phillips' story is a fascinating read, even if it might be a bit fictitious; some question the reporter's sources and credibility. Hell, fiction or not, it's a great story and it'd make a great movie. This story is notorious.

There's no point in arguing how debase it is for us to focus on the controversy and want to see the fiery side of this story, however speculative it might be. It's the voyeuristic, turkey-neck nature of viewers. But, folks will have to settle with a more upbeat take on Christopher Wallace's life in this film. Not that this doesn't have merit - the guy was an incredible artist and made music history - but it's a bit hard to enjoy a story like this when you realize so much isn't being told.

If you're interested in following the film's development, check out Notorious producer Wayne Barrow's blog here.

Find more posts: Casting, Movie News, Opinions



This should at least shed some light on what happened without finger pointing. Although I'm not a hip/hop fan, I believe this will be an interesting flick. The burning question: Is Sly Stallone involved in this production in any way?

Spider on Mar 17, 2008


I was hoping this would be a really good movie, even great. I guess I'll have to settle on it being just OK. Either way, I still want to see it.

Cecil on Mar 18, 2008


I wonder if your peers would be more interested if it was a big screen adaptation of the life of Kurt Cobain. Anyway, I will hold out a little hope that this will be a good film that probes deep into Biggie's life. But with his mom producing it that'll be unlikely. It should be against the law for someone to make a biopic of a close family member.

kevjohn on Mar 18, 2008


I hope its good, but yeah I get the feeling it's gonna be watered down.

PimpSlapStick on Mar 18, 2008


They did make a movie about Kurt Cobain... It was sad to see how much of a loser he was... BIG was in no way a loser and was cut down in his prime. The only thing I am nervous about is how they portray Tupac Shakur, now that was one smart man, the real tradgedy. 'Pac would of definately hit the political stage at some point and it was almost like an assasination of a prophet, a person who just had something, not to mention his music was definately unoriginal. Tupac was not involved in BIGs death and i hope they portray them both in a positive light.

Za Don on Dec 1, 2008

New comments are no longer allowed on this post.



Subscribe to our feed -or- daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main account on twitter:
For the latest posts only - follow this one:

Add our updates to your Feedly - click here

Get the latest posts sent in Telegram Telegram