Sunday Discussion: Where Have All the Indie Gems Gone?

September 21, 2008


As I sit here, under the awning of the famous Alamo Drafthouse in Austin, Texas, I'm wondering why I haven't seen more indie gems. If you don't know what I mean by indie gems, let me give a quick explanation. I travel to film festivals all over the world all year long in search of independent films, created with budgets smaller than most college tuitions, that are phenomenal works of cinematic art. In essence, I'm looking for those movies to fall in love with, those little movies that hardly anyone knows about but are the best movies of the year. Between Sundance, SXSW, Telluride, and Toronto, I expected to find quite a few of them this year, whether they're dramas, comedies, horror, sci-fi, or otherwise. But this year I've been coming up a bit short and I don't really know why? Was it the writer's strike or was it something else?

I really don't know the answer to this question. Hell, I don't even really know how to ask this question. Maybe I haven't gotten enough sleep and should be asking myself whether I need more? Maybe I just haven't enjoyed too many of this year's movies when others have love them? Either way, I know there are gems out there, I just need to find them. There are a couple of big exceptions, and when I mention these, I mean that they really stood out: Danny Boyle's Slumdog Millionaire, Kim Ji-woon's The Good, The Bad, and The Weird, Darren Aronofsky's The Wrestler, Rian Johnson's The Brothers Bloom, and most recently, Tomas Alfredson's Let the Right One In. But there are so many films, like J.T. Petty's The Burrowers or Derick Martini's Lymelife or Brian Goodman's What Doesn't Kill You, that I felt should have been gems, but weren't. They just fell a bit short and I can't exactly figure out why.

I guess one of the reasons why I'm bringing this up today is because I don't think I've come across this year's Juno or Fido. Unfortunately my favorite films from Sundance, specifically The Wackness and Baghead, got destroyed by Sony Pictures Classics during their theatrical exhibition. And my other Sundance favorites, including The Escapist, Hell Ride, American Teen, and Assassination of a High School President, have either not even been released or got buried during the summer season. So maybe my complaint is actually with the the distributors and the state of independent cinema. I fall in love with these movies and try so hard to promote them, but then lose all my energy when they end up buried by studios. It's not that they didn't connect with audiences, it's that they didn't have a chance to begin with!

Maybe Darren Aronofsky already figured this out. In our interview with the filmmaker, he mentioned that the independent cinema system is cyclical. "The economy's in a tough place and there's not a lot of free money right now. So it's really, really hard to make film, especially original film, especially risk-taking film. But it's going to come back, it has to, because people just get bored and they want to see something new and something different." I see so many mediocre films at festivals all year long that I eventually get burned out. At this point in time, I'm tired of the typical drama, I need something more. I already hate lavish period pieces (like The Duchess), that seem to have found a place at film festivals. Hopefully when our economy gets back to normal (if ever), we'll start to see more original indie films again.

Hopefully as this year starts to wrap up, I'll run across a few more gems. If not, I'll at least end this year with some new favorites, but not exactly a large quantity of them. Whether it's the writer's strike or the economy or something else, this year won't live up the past few years before it. There are some great films that I'll walk away with, including the five I mentioned above, but it won't be the most unforgettable year. Maybe it's the distribution system? Maybe it's my evolving taste in film? Maybe I'm just getting tired of the same mediocre dramas? I'm not entirely sure why there weren't as many indie gems, but I guess I'm just not overly satisfied with the indie films this year. I could be entirely wrong, in fact, by January I could be saying that there were some fine films and I was just full of it back in September. Who knows?

Whatever the outcome, there is one thing that's certain. Be on the look out for the few indie gems I do mention, because they definitely are true gems. The few of them that I have found are truly remarkable.

Amethyst photo courtesy of adamantine on Flickr.

Find more posts: Discuss, Editorial, Opinions



I'm personally really excited for Battle In Seattle, and the trailers for both Cthulhu and Ballast look pretty interesting

Spencer C on Sep 22, 2008


It's hollywood realizing how much of a market these indie gems cover. It is my idea that in some way, the industry is attempting to put out gems in hopes that they can make money off the rest of the population of movie goers, film readers, which has been an absent part of the industry's total gross profits. By having stronger pull with distribution rights, members on the board, etc., a focus feature film has a better chance getting into sundance then my college film, montigue's invention. Think about it, its mostly politics. Hate to say it but the reason why we aren't seeing anything authentic or remotely original that touches us and keeps us awake at night is because the festival scene has begun to hit the assembly line. History repeats itself. Or it could be that people just aren't original anymore... any other ideas?

t.pfeffer on Sep 22, 2008


@ t.pfeffer - 100% agree. Hollywood now owns indie houses... how did that happen? Isn't that like kids owning candy stores? The 'gems' are supposed to be few and far between - thus the metaphor to rare stones of beauty. If every movie is a gem, there aren't any. Hollywood hasn't had an original thought for 20yrs - maybe 50. But they have a few things going for them, control of the industry and a known market. Why are they remaking... um... everything? Why not? People pay money for it. HELL - I pay money for it. So Hollywood is on cruise control - make movie, rake money, simple. Then someone comes along and make a Blair Witch, or a Little Miss Sunshine - suddenly someone's making a bundle of cash, someone ...else. So the only answer is to commandeer these snivelling infidels and direct the cash back where it belongs. Bring on the Hollywood Indie Houses - I think every major studios has one now - although one or two may have shut the doors already. Problem is the indie's are what they are because they struggle, because the don't have security, or experience - you can't get what they are from a machine. Hollywood is Lycra to indies' knitted wool. You just can't get the same results if you try to put the same raw materials into the sofisticated, shiny machine. I. Have Camera, Will Indie

Ian MacLatchie on Sep 22, 2008


I'm confused you talk about finding indie movies that are cheap. Yet you mention all indie movies that had million dollor plus budgets.

Jesse on Sep 22, 2008


I think the problem is is that financers aren't backing as many because not as many are being picked up because of the poor economy which has studios being more cautious than ever. Notice how TIN-TIN is getting trouble being backed even. Do you think any of these arthouse ones have a chance as much now?

Ryan on Sep 22, 2008


I thought Dean Spanley was a teriffic little film , unique and funny at the same time but then I thought Country for Old Men was a dog...and Juno just so-so ...but then what do I know.

Shooey on Sep 22, 2008


I just finished watching Snow Angels. Seemed to be a good little indie gem that went extremely overlooked this year.

Zach D. on Sep 23, 2008

New comments are no longer allowed on this post.



Subscribe to our feed -or- daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main account on twitter:
For the latest posts only - follow this one:

Add our updates to your Feedly - click here

Get the latest posts sent in Telegram Telegram