Cannes 2009 Review: Alejandro Amenabar's Agora

May 17, 2009

Alejandro Amenabar's Agora

A historical epic at Cannes? That doesn't seem right, but indeed, Agora fits, not perfectly, but it's a good Cannes period piece, at least. In his latest ambitious film Agora, Spanish-Chilean director Alejandro Amenabar takes us back to ancient Egypt, in the city of Alexandria around the year 391 A.D. We are shown the story of the professor and philosopher Hypatia (Rachel Weisz), and the events that occur in Alexandria around her, mainly the rise of Christianity. Agora boasts some wonderful production design and presents a fascinating look at the religious feuds of the time, but otherwise struggles with some writing problems.

One of the problems with Agora is that it struggles to properly develop the romantic side of the story. One of her students, named Orestes (Oscar Isaac), who is destined for great things, is in love with her, but not she with him. On the other hand, Hypatia's humble and shy slave Davus (Max Minghella) is also in love with her, or so it seems. We never really see either of those relationships build into anything. That "love triangle", of sorts, does have an importance in the overall story, but it was the weakest part of the script. However, it's not completely awful, as I was utterly fascinated with the political and religious side of the story.

Agora's real focus is on the rise of Christianity and fall of the Pagans and the Jews in the city. At the time, the Pagans (as they were known), who worshiped Egyptian gods, made up a majority of the population, but Christianity was spreading and soon began to take over the city. We are shown the events that unfold as tempers begin to boil over amongst religions. The turning point comes when the Christians try to overrun the library, which Hypatia's father runs. All of this is occurring while the Roman Empire still rules in Egypt, and a Prefect, somewhat of an emperor with localized powers, has supreme control over the city. This presentation of the historical story was actually well done and certainly the highlight of the film for me.

While the writing may have some rough edges, there is still a lot to admire about Agora. It is hugely epic in scale, and beautifully conceived by director Alejandro Amenabar and his production designer Guy Hendrix Dyas. I wouldn't be surprised if it gets an Oscar nomination for production design, and it certainly deserves it, as the sets were lavish and grand in scale, while also intricately detailed. Indeed, Agora was a true cinematic transportation back to ancient Egypt, and Amenabar deserves heaps of praise for at least pulling that off. While the relationships in the story were undeveloped, I could at least appreciate the visuals.

This film has the "swagger" to be confused for a big budget studio production, but it's also got some finer aspects worth appreciating thanks to the grand vision of Amenabar. Unfortunately, if he would've spent some more time developing the script, maybe it could've been even better. Agora also suffers ever so slightly from the Australia effect - at one point in the middle, the story jumps ahead a few years, and the split could be considered the perfect place to break the film in two. But I, for one, will argue that Agora is great the way it is, and I'll be happy to revisit it again in the future, if not to at least appreciate the epic historical story.

Cannes Rating: 7.5 out of 10

Find more posts: Cannes 09, Opinions



A journalist friend of mine just e-mailed me his review and said that outside of Rachel Weisz's performance and the great cinematography, the movie is just OK. He predicts that Weisz could get a nomination for her performance though.

Dave on May 17, 2009


Rachel Weisz= HOT! I will see this just because of her.

CLAW on May 17, 2009


For being and epic movie, i guess it will more than OK. Amenabar may not have the best teams around him like "Spielberg profile" directors have, but I personally think he one of the talents an sugestive directors nowadays, as he is only four movies shows. I found in this review many of the suspects i had. Amenabar concept of movies are a real risk i think, wich he always resolves from fine to very good, and in this case looks the same.

Adrian on May 18, 2009


Amenabar es, seguramente, el director español con más talento... incluso por encima del cada vez más previsible Almodovar...

natxo on May 18, 2009


Que natxo?

Scott McHenry on May 18, 2009


Sounds excellent! I hope that the movie is soon shown in theatres - have not seen any announcement yet. The point that the "story" is not well developed is actually moot: this is about a "real" person, about real events. The jump in time had to be, because the library destruction happened in 391, whereas her death was in the early 400s. There is actually a dispute about how old Hypatia really was: some say that she was killed at age 60, which makes it wholly less romantical... To tell the truth, I would not care at all about those relationship stories in the movie; they may just have been stitched on, to attract also those who would never to to any movie which does not have any sort of romantic love in it. But the core of the story is something different: a civilisation at a turning point, with fundamentalists getting the upper hand, and the end of a large empire. Now that is what I want to see when I will watch this movie - the relationship stuff in it is just added for the chicks 🙂

Reinhold Behringer on May 19, 2009


Now a movie about the slaughter of writers/poets by the so called prophet mohammad who was a thief, a plunderer, a rapist, a pedophile, a murderer...

Muhammad’s Dead Poets on Oct 16, 2009


Agreed. The love triangle was the weakest part of the script. My Agora Film Review:

Film-Book dot Com on Mar 26, 2010


it's too bad that they portrayed christians so negatively in this movie. they didn't burn down the library of alexandria, muslims did. some simple googling with this little tool called google said so. i dug the movie though.. it did seem to feel like it was dragging towards the end. could have condensed it by 20-30 minutes

Gregory Nicholas on May 8, 2011


You keep emphasizing "historical," but you'd be surprised how "unhistorical" this movie actually is.

Nathan Brasfield on Nov 5, 2011

New comments are no longer allowed on this post.



Subscribe to our feed or daily newsletter:

Follow Alex's main account on Twitter:

For only the latest posts - follow this:

Add our posts to your Feedlyclick here

Get all the news sent on Telegram Telegram