The Weekly Moviegoer - Cloudy with a Change of Gimmick

April 9, 2009

Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs

Nevermind that Sony's upcoming animated film Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs (watch the trailer if you haven't yet) bears little resemblance to its beloved source material - Judi Barrett's children's book. Considering my attitude towards the redundancy of adapted films like Frank Miller's Sin City and Zack Snyder's Watchmen, I can't rightly complain that the plot of this adaptation is not exactly as Judi Barrett wrote it nor that it doesn't look anything like Ron Barrett's illustrations. What I can rightly complain about, however, is that the movie will not be presented appropriately in Smell-O-Vision like it should be.

For those of you who don't remember, Smell-O-Vision is an old cinema gimmick, kind of like 3D. But instead of bombarding you with the illusion of pop-out images, it bombards you with odors that are relevant to what's onscreen. For example, for the one and only official Smell-O-Vision release, Jack Cardiff's Scent of Mystery, moviegoers would smell the scent of pipe tobacco whenever a certain character was present. Unfortunately, the gimmick had its flaws, just as old 3D did, and it didn't catch on. However, now that digital 3D is becoming more successful, it only makes sense to bring back a new form of Smell-O-Vision.

If you think the return of 3D is bad enough, know that one other '50s-era cinema gimmick has already sort of made a comeback as well. Like a modern equivalent to William Castle's "Percepto" stunt, which involved electric shockers on the bottoms of theater seats for his film The Tingler, D-Box's new Motion Code seats shake the moviegoer at designated times to coincide with the action happening onscreen. This past weekend, Fast & Furious became the first movie to be presented publicly in the D-Box experience, though only two cinemas (Mann Chinese 6 in Hollywood and the Ultrastar Cinemas Surprise Pointe 14 in Arizona) currently feature the gimmick.

If you don't live anywhere near these two cinemas, you can get an idea of what the experience is like from comedians Scott Auckerman (Mr. Show), Paul Scheer (Human Giant) and Rob Huebel (Human Giant), who collectively live-Tweeted their trip to the Mann Chinese 6 for Fast & Furious with "rumble seat technology" last week. Apparently, the seats shake every time there's a car crash in the movie, and whether he was being honest or not, Auckerman wrote that it's the ONLY way to see this particular movie. Of course, it may also be, reciprocally, one of the few movies appropriate for the technology, too. Auckerman joked that the D-Box seats will be used for the next Noah Baumbach movie, but he was obviously kidding with that remark.

Fortunately, there will always be car crashes and other action sequences that this technology will be good for. But otherwise, unlike 3D, motion seats can't really work with all films (not that all films will one day be 3D, despite Jeff Katzenberg's predictions). And, of course, neither could a modernized version of Smell-O-Vision (perhaps developed by NTT Communications, a company that already tried a new odor-emitting gimmick with Terrence Malick's The New World in Japan a few years back) be good for just any movie. So, perhaps theaters and movie studios could agree on what kinds of films are appropriate for what kind of gimmick. For instance, an adaptation of a pop-up book would make the most sense as a 3D movie, while a scratch and sniff book should certainly be in Smell-O-Vision.

And this brings me back to why Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs needs to be in "SOV" rather than (or in addition to) 3D. Sure, the book of Cloudy isn't a scratch and sniff book, but Sony is promoting the film with scratch and sniff cards. So, it would be neat if the movie at least utilized John Waters' "Odorama" technique, which enhanced the viewing experience of his 1981 film, Polyester, with cards that were scratched and sniffed by audiences when prompted. Of course, the original Smell-O-Vision would be even more fitting for Cloudy and its food-meets-weather storyline, because with the earlier gimmick, scents were pumped through air vents with fans, as if it's the wind carrying the odors to moviegoers. And if you think the kids won't appreciate smelling the bad odors (the book includes a scene featuring stinky gorgonzola) along with the good (pancakes with butter and syrup), then you must not be familiar with Bertie Bott's Every Flavor Beans. If kids can eat candy that tastes like toenails and rotten eggs, they will enjoy a few bad odors intentionally accompanying a slapstick cartoon.

As for other gimmicks and their appropriate releases, Hollywood could update William Castle's "Illusion-O", which involved a special viewing device (easily mistakable for 3D specs) that could make the film's ghosts appear or disappear depending on the viewer's fright level. Something like this could be used for any of the many ghost movies produced each year, such as The Haunting in Connecticut. Meanwhile, with so many other stunts returning to theaters, 3D can be reserved for movies that are most appropriate for the format. For example, Fox should have appropriately made X-Men Origins: Wolverine its first digital 3D movie, because those claws would look awesome seemingly popping out into the auditorium (then Fox would also have a good reason for moviegoers to see the film in theaters rather than illegally download it).

So, what other gimmicks could Hollywood and theater owners pilfer from William Castle and/or Disney World (which has such attractions as the D-Box-like Star Tours and the 3D film It's Tough to be a Bug!, which features Smell-O-Vision-like technology, too)? And what kinds of films would be especially appropriate for these kind of gimmicky attractions? Also, at what point will your local multiplex be too much like Dave & Busters for you to have any more interest in going to the movies? Thoughts?

Special thanks to Drew McWeeny at HitFix for the hat tip regarding Auckerman and friends.

Find more posts: Discuss, Editorial, Opinions



Alex, please don't give Hollywood any ideas. The only film in the last ten years to even come close to evoking the spirit of those great William Castle shows was Grindhouse, and we all remember how that panned out.

Fuelbot on Apr 9, 2009


i think that if these new gimmicks were used it would take attention and focus away from the movie and put it towards a shaking seat or the smells in the room.

PJ H on Apr 9, 2009


Smell-O-Vision should definitely make a comeback. I've always believed that our sense of smell is the most unappreciated sense (if that makes sense).

AbercrombieAndBitch on Apr 9, 2009


That illusion-o sounds the coolest. I would like to see that happen. The smell-o-vision could be cool for this movie, it would fit. I remember the scratch and sniff cards for Rugrats Go Wild when I was little, I don't remember liking it all that much though when I was a little kid.... The seat thing could be annoying pretty fast too. the only one I would really like see happen is the Illusion-o. That sounds like fun.

Jesse Gouldsbury on Apr 9, 2009


These gimmicks are just another way for ticket prices to keep going up.

Curtis G on Apr 9, 2009


Tyler and K Hogg, this is not a news article; it's a column. Sorry if it's not of interest to you guys.

Christopher Campbell on Apr 9, 2009


Who the hell hired this guy? He writes the most ludicrous and irrelevant crap I've ever read.

Zamora on Apr 9, 2009


Bringing back these gimmicks may be the only thing to save the theatre going experience from VOD/Home theatres.

BSP on Apr 9, 2009


This is absolutely, positively the dumbest article I have ever read pertaining to film. Bring back Smell-o-vision? Are you KIDDING me? It really must be slow season.

Nate on Apr 9, 2009


1) Smell-O-Vision will not come back, and most gimmicks through history have been popular for a while and then died down. SOME have not. like Sound and Color in movies. which brings me to: 2) 3D might not catch on big or make it very far with this little re-birth it's experiencing, but the simple fact is that Depth Perception is one of the few things that we all naturally experience that movies don't normally provide. Most of us see in color, most of us hear. Most of us also see depth. Few films have tapped that extra sensory information, but there is technology in the works that will allow people to see images in 3D WITHOUT glasses. Probably not on a big screen (not for some time, anyway), but there are several tehnologies for smaller screens that are capable of creating the 3D effect. Some are better than others, but it's all getting more and more do-able on a large scale. I think that if these 3D movies do catch on and get released in theaters with some semblance of regularity, that the demand for 3D-capable display that doesn't require glasses will go up more and more, and that will drive a lot of research into finding even better ways to achieve the effect. Mark my words: I give it ten years before some company has a 3D display on the market that can create the effect AND be somewhat affordable. You can get a 3D LCD monitor right now, but the effect - while impressive - is far from ideal, you have to sit at a certain angle and it costs something like a thousand bucks. There would already be an in-built market of gamers who would be willing to pay some cash to get that sort of immersion.

Squiggly on Apr 10, 2009

New comments are no longer allowed on this post.



Subscribe to our feed -or- daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main account on twitter:
For the latest posts only - follow this one:

Add our updates to your Feedly - click here

Get the latest posts sent in Telegram Telegram