LATEST NEWS

Focus Features Delays The Boat That Rocked Until November

by
June 26, 2009

The Boat That Rocked

I don't usually report on release date changes like this unless there is something more to the story. Variety reports today that Richard Curtis' new comedy The Boat That Rocked will be distributed by Focus Features (instead of Universal proper) and has been delayed until November from its original late August release. Interestingly, they add that they're "working with filmmaker Richard Curtis to create a leaner version for American auds after the film's mixed run overseas." This isn't the kind of movie I'll be starting fights over (like Inglourious Basterds) but I'm surprising to see Universal switching things up last minute.

I know that Universal has been testing this film quite a bit with audiences in Los Angeles. But apparently it hasn't been doing so well at the international box office, making only $9.1 million in the UK, well below expectations. "It will be a shorter, leaner version. We think it is a real crowd-pleaser. We love a challenge, and we love working with Working Title," Focus Features president James Schamus said. They'll be working with Curtis to trim about 20 minutes from the film, which originally ran 129 minutes. No specific date in November has been set yet, but we'll be keep you update. In the meantime, check out the latest trailer.

Find more posts: Indies, Movie News, Opinions

Discover more around the web:

Reader Feedback - 11 Comments

1

I hate that Hollywood considers us so stupid and impatient. But... We are.

Mark on Jun 26, 2009

2

I saw "The Boat that Rocked" a couple of weeks ago, and tell you what, it's too long and incoherent, so trimming out twenty minutes - if done sensibly - might actually be a smart move. I still doubt it can be turned into a real crowd-pleaser though because the movie clearly lacks an emotional core. Considering the talent that was involved in this production, "The Boat that Rocked" turned out very disappointing.

Lory Roebuck on Jun 26, 2009

3

You can't do this now, it's too late. They had their opportunity in the screening phase. They they have to wear their badge and screen the same movie everywhere.

jules on Jun 26, 2009

4

I saw this months ago in the UK and loved it. Its no 'Love Actually' but it doesnt try to be. Love actually was meant to be a heart twister/warmer. This wasnt. This was supposed to be a look at the end of British Pirate radio in the 60s and it does it well. The soundtrack is amazing too. The best of 60s pop music.

Marcus on Jun 26, 2009

5

I did have a point to make and then saw Lory Roebuck comments which could be no more accurate. The film is a flabby mess with some good elements but not enough to make it a satisfying experience as a whole with or without a little bit of scissor action.

lee on Jun 26, 2009

6

Curtis can do his kind of writing thing quite well, not that I'm a fan, but the man cannot direct.

lee on Jun 26, 2009

7

this obviously has to do with them thinking it may have a better chance at Oscar contention.

Al on Jun 26, 2009

8

it was the RoTF of music movies!

chrisUK on Jun 26, 2009

9

I've seen it too and I disagree with the above comments about it not having 'crowd pleasing' potential. A good twenty minute butchering would transform this into a really good movie. Its strongest emotional punch lies in all the various montage sequences of loads of people jamming to the pirate station's music--so they better not cut a single thing from any of that. All the serious melodramatic Titanic crap in the third act could really be shortened a lot as well as the entire sub-plot sequence of the weird tramp who marries the geeky guy just to get to screw the hot guy. Not only was that not funny, but it was too unbearably sad and seriously shifted the movie's tone from comedy to awkward melodrama.

George on Jun 26, 2009

10

This movie rocks! I don't see how they can trim 20 minutes without seriously injuring this picture.

Martin on Jun 26, 2009

11

I watched this movie when it was release in Febuaryish over here in the UK, it doesn't need re-cutting, it is film of the year by far.

Stuart Mellor on Jun 27, 2009

Sorry, no commenting is allowed at this time.

FEATURED POSTS

POPULAR COMMENTS

LAST YEAR'S TOP 10

Alex's Top 10 - 2017
1. Call Me By Your...
2. War for Apes
3. Shape of Water
4. Florida Project
5. Dunkirk
6. Jane
7. Foxtrot
8. Faces, Places
9. Never Really Here
10. Thelma
Click Here for Thoughts

Jeremy's Top 10- 2017
1. mother!
2. Lady Bird
3. A Ghost Story
4. The Big Sick
5. Dunkirk
6. Get Out
7. Killing Sacred Deer
8. John Wick 2
9. War for Apes
10. The Beguiled
Click Here for Thoughts

FOLLOW US HERE

Subscribe to our feed or daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main profile on twitter:
For the news posts only, follow this acct:

Add FS to your Feedly updates: click here

OUR FACEBOOK / AD