Steven Spielberg is Directing a Remake of 'Harvey' Next

August 2, 2009


Last week we wrote about how Steven Spielberg was interested in directing a Matt Helm movie, although he still hadn't chosen what he would be directing next. Well, he has chosen his next project, and it's a contemporary adaptation of Mary Chase's play Harvey. The play is about a man and his friendship with an invisible, six-foot tall rabbit. 20th Century Fox and DreamWorks will co-produce the project. "I am very happy to be working again with my friend Tom Rothman who shepherded us through Minority Report, and with Elizabeth and Carla, who I'm looking forward to collaborating with." Spielberg said in a press release.

Harvey was previously adapted into a movie in 1950 with James Stewart. Novelist Jonathan Tropper has written the adaptation for the new version that Spielberg will direct. It's a wonderful play, as I was actually involved in a production of it years ago, but it's not at all anything I'd imagine someone like Spielberg would be interested in. No casting is in place yet, but pre-production is to begin immediately, with filming set to begin after the first of the year. I'm very curious to see what he'll do with this, as I expect him to twist the plot a bit in ways we haven't seen before. We'll keep you updated on casting and other details as they arrive!

Find more posts: Movie News, Opinions



I'm not at all excited for this. Spielberg's bread and butter is sci fi movies, and that's what the majority of his fans want to see from him. At least we have up and coming young directors to take his place.

rorschach90 on Aug 2, 2009


No one can take Spielberg’s place; especially no one within the current excuse of so called new sci fi directors. They may make movies, but they are not even on the same planet when it comes to Spielberg.

Hari Seldon on Aug 2, 2009


Tom Hanks. Period. That's the casting.

Quanah on Aug 2, 2009


A director cannot limit himself to what 'the majority of fans want to see from him.'

immature on Aug 2, 2009


Um... since when did Spielberg become a sci-fi director? Jaws wasn't sci-fi, it was a thriller. Indiana Jones wasn't sci-fi until they horned it into the 4th film (it was an adventure series). Empire of the Sun... The Color Purple... Hook... Schindler's List... Amistad... Saving Private Ryan... Catch Me If You Can... The Terminal... You make a few sci-fi blockbusters amidst a varied and brilliant career and suddenly you're typecast as a "big and exciting and scifi" director? I think you are severely, SEVERELY misinterpreting the man and his work. If anything, I look more forward to his whimsical dramas than his dime-a-dozen blockbuster action films. Remember War of the Worlds? He should stick to what he does best - directing the finest actors in the world in the finest dramatic roles possible. If anything, the only reason he does so well at science fiction is because he chooses films that stress the characters above all else - for instance, E.T. is more about the friendship between ET and Elliot and less about him being a space martian. I think Harvey is a perfect choice for him (despite being a *AAAHHHITBURNS* remake). He is remarkably talented at bringing out deep and heartwarming performances from his male leads so this should be another in a long line of winners for him.

Pete the Geek on Aug 2, 2009


Okay...Amen # 5!!!! Yeah sorry to pile on #1 but 5,4 & 2 have it exactly right. Spielberg is so much more than a "Sci Fi" director! One can even argue that his dramas ( The Color Purple, Schindler's List, etc. ) are his best movies. So let's not short change one of THE great directors of all time. #3...hold up on that. That casting would be too obvious, expected and just plain boring!!!! Do we have to see Tom play yet another All American man in an Oscar bait movie????? How about a little more unconventional for the casting of this.....

Jay on Aug 2, 2009


#6 - Zach Galifanakis. BAM.

Fuelbot on Aug 2, 2009


I agree with #6 on the casting issue. My suggestion: Throw Liam Neeson a bone. He has long been rumored to be playing the title role in Spielberg's supposed Abe Lincoln project. I think Neeson could do good things, with a role like this.

Dave Lister, JMC on Aug 2, 2009


#7 Jason Schwartzman POW.

Xerxex on Aug 2, 2009


Jay Tom Hanks is The American Man!

Xerxex on Aug 2, 2009


Idiots for thinking he's a Sci-fi...or is ir Sifi? *rolls eyes* Either way, I'm sorry but this classic is abotu to be destroyed. This was like remaking The Producers. How luch long til they screw over every movie like Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, Gone with the Wind, Ben Hur, etc?

Tra la la la la di da on Aug 2, 2009


If you got Tom Hanks for this, South Park would be on the money with the prediction of "Me and Mr Hankey." btw: this is a bad idea anyway.

jules on Aug 2, 2009


Wait, a remake...I thought Donnie Darko was a remake of Harvey already. lol.

Matt on Aug 3, 2009


Casting: anyone know of a friendly satanist to fill James Stewart´s iconic role? 🙂

David Banner on Aug 3, 2009


I remember Jim Carrey doing an interview a few years ago and doing a line or two from Harvey. I could see him in the part.

Mutt on Aug 3, 2009


Damn Good point #13!!! LOL

Hari Seldon on Aug 3, 2009


I couldn't have said it better #5. You saved me a lot of typing!

Ashley on Aug 3, 2009



Voice of Reason on Aug 3, 2009


#6 Fair enough. I actually thought about this last night. I can see Zach Braff doing this role. I can also see quite easily John Krasinski. If you wanted to go older, how about George Clooney? In the end, I'd love, love, love to see Viggo Mortensen.

Quanah on Aug 3, 2009


BAD IDEA. I do NOT want to see this remade. If you've seen the original, you know that it's a wonderful classic in the Frank Capra tradition that's pretty much perfect just as it is. It's a story in the old "Hollywood magic" style, and that's a style Spielberg just doesn't do. I think this will turn out to be a major disappointment. That being said, the only way I could see it come close to working is with Tom Hanks.

scm1000 on Aug 3, 2009


I dunno...I initially thought this was a bad idea, and I still have reservations. But, I would like to see a version without some of the bad acting that surrounded Stewart in the classic version. I'm speaking specifically about the actors that played the doctor and the nurse. Jesse White's job was also a little off playing the "orderly". So, yeah, this could be good. Tom Hanks would be an obvious choice, but what about Kevin Costner? He is surprising good in relaxed, laid back roles ("The Upside of Anger", "Field of Dreams". Kevin Spacey could also nail it.

kitano0 on Aug 4, 2009


NOT Tom Hanks. OR Will Smith. I do not want to see either of their big, dumb faces smiling up at an invisible rabbit. And Kevin Spacey stopped being interesting in the 90's. And Jason Schwartzman? Are you brain damaged? He would make that movie an even bigger turd than it's going to be. They'll probably have Harvey texting or drag racing or fighting decepticons or making out with Rachel McAdams or whatever the hell they do in movies nowadays. It doesn't matter who stars in it or who directs it, it's going to be a big old suckfest just like all the other remakes out there.

Someone with an actual brain on Aug 4, 2009


I agree, he would have to get a great cast of great ACTORS not necessarily big names! Stewart carried that movie and it is one great movie, remaking it could fall flat based on casting alone..this is touchy...

Lando on Aug 4, 2009


Another goddamned remake. I say we take off and nuke Hollywood from orbit, it's the only way to be sure.

Fed Up With Hollywood on Aug 5, 2009


James Stewart. that's all you need to know about remaking this, and why it's a bad (that's BAD) idea. but, my exposure to the story has always been the film (and yes, #21 / kitano0, the support in the 1950 film is not great), so i should find a copy of the play somewhere, and since this *is* already on the conveyor belt... i can see why people have suggested Hanks. it could work, he's one of the closest things Hollywood has these days to Stewart. he's virtually played most aspects of the character in Forrest Gump anyway. but for me, he's too obvious a choice. i get stuck on suggesting another, because.. it's Jimmy freakin' Stewart! and while Jonny Depp could play it, it doesn't matter how much i like him - he'd be as obvious as Hanks. Stewart was the classic Hollywood everyman. #11's right - we'll have a Mr Smith Goes... remake soon! what next? Scarlett Johansson starts remaking all of the Marilyn films? since she's been slapped in enough 'blonde bomshell' make-up to emulate her for the last few years, she should be a shoe-in. i'm off to watch The Philadephia Story again to make myself feel better. although Frank Sinatra already remade that, now i come to think of it.

lumière on Aug 5, 2009


Hugh Laurie would do it magnificently. There are few people who could immerse themselves into a role that they are excited about as does Hugh. He is a master of wordless communication - I could see in his face the strange combination of sad wisdom and independent madness that portraying Dowd would require. In a recent online chat on the Gold Derby website, Hugh was asked: --------- You mentioned James Stewart as an inspiration - Spielberg is doing a remake of Harvey - would you be interested? HUGH LAURIE: Harvey, heck yes...

rbrown205 on Aug 29, 2009

New comments are no longer allowed on this post.



Subscribe to our feed -or- daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main account on twitter:
For the latest posts only - follow this one:

Add our updates to your Feedly - click here

Get the latest posts sent in Telegram Telegram