Brandon's Sundance 2010 Reviews: Documentary Edition Pt 1
by Brandon Lee Tenney
January 25, 2010
When I attend a film festival, I often gravitate towards the documentaries being screened rather than the narrative features. Of course, I see tons of narratives, but I do my best to keep a high ratio of docs on my schedule for the very reason that I already see tons of narrative stories during the year anyway. It's very rare for any documentary to see a wide release. There aren't a whole lot of Michael Moores or Al Gores out there. For some really spectacular docs, they never even get a limited release. At film festivals, though, there are always a good amount of docs to choose from. This is especially true for the Sundance Film Festival.
Thus far, I've seen three feature-length documentaries and one short form doc. What's becoming evident -- especially when related to the documentaries -- is that this year's fest's theme is a clear force at the core of these films. That theme is: Rebel. All four docs capture their own form of rebellion in interesting, if not always successful, ways. So with that I'm presenting four reviews for four different documentaries I've seen.
On Sundance's opening night here in Park City, I caught Shorts Program I. Along with Spike Jonze's short I'm Here (that reviewed here) and two international short narratives, Rory Kennedy's The Fence premiered. This thirty-six minute documentary explores the sociological, environmental, political, economic, and personal effects of the United States's decision to build a 700-mile long fence on the U.S.-Mexico border.
At the staggering cost of over $3.1 billion, Kennedy lampoons the decision, the decision makers, and the fence itself in turn. There are several great satiric moments and the information presented is dynamic and interesting, but The Fence suffers from a severe case of bloat. It's overlong, which, for a short, is not a good thing. There are so many threads tackled within the film that it ends up feeling more like a cork board inside a bus station: tons of snippets all saying their own thing while slightly overlapping to form a cohesive whole. It's tonally uneven, shifting from startlingly serious to lighthearted and off-the-cuff. Its presentation is slick, though. And it's certainly worth the DVR space when HBO releases it.
Brandon's Sundance Rating: 6 out of 10
The Shock Doctrine
This documentary hailing from the United Kingdom is based on Naomi Klein's book of the same name. The Shock Doctrine attempts to explain the rise of disaster capitalism: the exploitation of moments of crisis in vulnerable countries by larger, more powerful governments and corporate big business. The topic as well as the film is a heady experience. There's a lot to take in and even more so to analyze afterward. The film traces the doctrine's origins to the radical theories of Milton Friedman at the University of Chicago and goes about delving into the effects of said theories across the world over the past forty years. From Pinochet's Chile to Yeltsin's Russia to Margaret Thatcher's Great Britain to the more recent invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, the film explains Friedman's not-so-invisible hand in them all. Such crises as Hurricane Katrina and 9/11 are also explored and re-appropriated through the lens of The Shock Doctrine.
Directors Michael Winterbottom and Mat Whitecross make heavy use of archival footage, slick info-graphics, and a recorded lecture given by Naomi Klein about her theory. It's extremely well made and well presented. Viewing these historical events through this fresh lens is akin to re-watching a film after knowing the end's twist. The doc is fearless when tackling controversial viewpoints on generally one-sided topics. It's harrowing as well, displaying governments (mostly the US's) taking such advantage of war-torn, shock-laden, paralyzed nations that have undergone one disaster or another in order to implement the government most suited to the American corporate structure. Disaster capitalism provides the opportunity for very large profits for very large governments while decimating the country it's occurring in all but completely. It's presented as the concept of mass torture, of mass shock. It's compelling information.
The film packs quite a punch in its 86 minute run time. When it concludes, though, the audience is left without much indication of what we, the now informed, can do to fight against this wide-spread shock treatment. This is a theme I'm noticing throughout the documentaries that I've seen in recent days: a lack of certainty on how to move forward that's indicative of our contemporary and future uncertain times. Ironically, though, what the film presents as most detestable is used within the film itself. This doc is shocking and tended toward some of the same patterns it admonishes in the film. Overall, it's a fascinating documentary that will hopefully find more eager eyes and open minds.
Brandon's Sundance Rating: 7.5 out of 10
Enemies of the People
After finishing Enemies of the People, I was conflicted. Within this doc is such an interesting, incredible story, but the documentary itself, its presentation and the filmmaking, is so amateurish that it stands in opposition to its great story. Over the course of ten years, Thet Sambath unearthed the untold tale of the Khmer Rouge and the brutal Killing Fields of Cambodia during the late 1970s. Sambath gains the trust of the Khmer Rouge's second in command, now in his eighties, and succeeds in documenting this lost piece of his culture and his family's history. Sambath's own mother and father fell victim to the very man he's now interviewing, though his lack of vengeance is saintlike. Again, the story is so very interesting, but it becomes very repetitive as it begins to fold over and over on to itself. It's incredible, no matter what the result, to see one man's ten-year struggle finally make it on screen, though.
Brandon's Sundance Rating: 5 out of 10
The Tillman Story
Enter my most-anticipated film of the 2010 Sundance Film Festival. Directed by Amir Bar-Lev (of My Kid Could Paint That fame), this documentary lays out the story of Patrick Tillman, professional football player for the Arizona Cardinals turned enlisted Army Ranger whose tragic, untimely death has been shrouded in conspiracy. If you watched the news at all last decade, you'll know the name Pat Tillman. Though, in the news, you probably know the propagandistic version of Pat Tillman. The one whose death was turned into a political, patriotic symbol by the United States government. Within the film, Bar-Lev features candid interviews of Tillman's family, friends, and fellow Rangers attempting to elucidate some kind of truth mixed amid the deceit.
The documentary is very good. It's able to make a comment without becoming preachy, and as Bar-Lev did with My Kid Could Paint That, the film is most powerful when its subjects are simply speaking for themselves. Overall, however, this story, and by association, this film is maddening. It plays like a political thriller complete with seedy dealings and lies and grand subterfuge. But it's very real. Watching Donald Rumsfeld lie on camera is blood-boiling. Watching Dannie Tillman, Pat Tillman's mother, attempt with overwhelming futility to combat the U.S. government to uncover the truth about her son's death while trying to reclaim his identity is heartbreaking.
Bar-Lev made The Tillman Story with the uninitiated in mind. Because I've followed the story since 2004, much of the information presented wasn't new to me. That, however, did not make it any less impacting. The interviews are splendid windows into the very definition of confusion and despair and resilience. When the video of Tillman's brother's speech at Tillman's funeral is played and he says into the mic "He's fucking dead!" it's haunting. Though I can't help but wish the film had one additional section. A section that would have pushed the issue further, challenged the subject, stuck it to the man in a Michael Moore-like style.
As the doc stands, it ends on a note of hopelessness and dissipated anger. Though the Tillman family is still resilient, the U.S. government is just too big. With this doc, though, Pat Tillman can be remembered how his family wishes him to be, not how the propaganda dictates he should be. It's a film that needs to be seen by as many people as possible. A maddening experience, but a necessary one.
Brandon's Sundance Rating: 8.5 out of 10
out of all of the Doc's reviewed here the only one that piques my interest is The Tilman Story, not because Pat Tilman played football but all of the mystery surrounding his death. At first he jumped on a gernade, then Friendly Fire came into play then murder. So I'll be sure to check this out either online or rental, the review really shines on it the most the others seem like they are either too much or too little. I followed the death of Pat Tilman for a long while and was disappointed when media attention fell away a lot of questions were let unanswered...and I got a question does The Tilman Story answer any?
Xerxex on Jan 26, 2010
Oh I gotta say I really did the pic you've featured, and I assume its from "The Fence" actually wait...its blatantly obivious it is...am I wrong?
Xerxex on Jan 26, 2010
nope, its a pic from The Shock Doctrine http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSF0e6oO_tw
Douglas on Jan 26, 2010
Please stop referring to Michael Moore as a maker of documentaries. The definition of "documentary" is to be factual and OBJECTIVE. What Moore does is so far off the mark from objectivity as to spit in the face of journalistic integrity, which would be fine if he were upfront about it, and didn't thinly veil it behind a mask of perceived moral obligation. His films are purely statements of his opinions and feelings; exploitative, slanted heavily, edited and crafted to be pure propaganda for the purpose of gratifying his ego and filling his bank accounts. I'm glad to hear that a documentarian (Bar-Lev) didn't "[stick] it to the man." The director prominently featuring himself in front of the camera throughout the feature, pointing fingers and hurling accusations is the kind of self-aggrandizing, ham-fisted cheap trick that is the earmark of poorly-made 'documentary.' The point of a revealing documentary is that if it's done correctly, the director doesn't have to personally 'stick it to' anyone: the film's presentation of FACTUAL, OBJECTIVE evidence is far more damning than anything the director could say.
thatguy on Jan 26, 2010
wow was i going to lay into you untill i read #4 thank you for saving me the time and a spell check thatguy im never reading a brandon tenney article again. you should have known better then to bring michael moore up, thats a beginner mistake.
jont on Jan 26, 2010
Xerxex on Jan 26, 2010
jont and thatguy really? Calm down, Moore is not what we assume in a Doc maker, but he is a big name and maybe Tenney could only think of Gore and Moore, ever think about that?
Xerxex on Jan 26, 2010
More documentaries to make me feel even less interested in humanity.
crapola on Jan 26, 2010
Just got out of The Tillman Story for Park City locals screening and thought it was quite excellent. The director and Danny Tillman came out and got a standing ovation. The films speaks quite eloquently for itself, and does not need a Michael Moore sock-it-to-em, but I can see why Brandon felt this need for justification; the director spoke about the most surprising thing he encountered while making the film, which was that of the media portrayal and how opposite (and preposterous) it was from the actuality of the Supreme Court generals' inquisition. That said, Michael Moore himself said the film "is one of the most important movies you'll ever see about the U.S. government." This is a great review of the movie. It does play like a political thriller, especially when they break down the events surrounding his death. And the interviewed subjects do speak for themselves--some of them quite articulate. Great movie. I am recommending it to all.
risa on Jan 26, 2010
xerxex - in a word, no
jont on Jan 27, 2010
New comments are no longer allowed on this post.