Review: Too Much Mild, But Not Enough Edge in Knight & Day
by Jeremy Kirk
June 23, 2010
Running from hails of bullets, leaping onto speeding cars, landing jetliners in corn fields after inadvertently killing off both of the pilots. It's hard work being a secret agent these days. And that's not even getting into the mess of becoming infatuated with a civilian blonde whom you have accidentally gotten involved in your latest attempt to save the world. So how does Tom Cruise's Roy Miller do it all without seeming to become flustered or falling apart at the seams? It probably has something to do with how soft the action surrounding him is in Knight and Day, a film that has little in the way of edges and even less in the way of surprise.
It's not an absolute let-down. From the moment he spots June Havens, played by the ever bubbly Cameron Diaz, at the airport in the film's hurried opening credits, the fun turns its control knob all the way clockwise and shows no signs of letting up. During their flight, Roy kills everyone on the plane but June. He says he's a secret agent, but he comes off more as an escapee from the local asylum than anything we've seen from 007 films. Once they've reached the ground, Roy drugs June into unconsciousness and returns her to her normal life, that's when things get really "hairy."
Those quotes are there simply for the fact that director James Mangold's vision of trouble and my own do not match. He seems to think CG car chases where our hero seems to be attached to one car via Velcro while another car flips over his head is danger-tainment. I could go for something a little more grounded. There are a lot of leaps to be found in Knight and Day, and I'm not talking about physical jumping ability. You're supposed to believe a lot of what is going on is conceivable let alone executable in the very real world of espionage. People do certainly die in this world Roy and June inhabit, sometimes with an ample amount of force being driven into them from the side. But this idea of what Mangold wants us to believe in is hindered by how bright and cheery his images are. Everything seems to be infused in a color palette not found anywhere in the real world. It's not so far down the color line as to find itself in Tim Burton territory. More like The Simpsons, really. You almost feel like everyone should have a bright, yellow hue to their skin.
It's hard getting past this leap in reality that comes both from the script and in Mangold's direction of that script. But this leap pails in comparison to the one we are forced to take between Roy and June. What does he see in her? It's never explained to us. We get some back-story as to who Roy was before becoming a covert operative, but nothing is ever revealed as to what it is about June that appeals to him.
Harder to understand, I guess, is the appeal the character being played by Tom Cruise has towards the character being played by Diaz. With another actress in this role, it may have been more believable. Cruise is wacky and intense, and it's just the right combination of both of those mixed with a healthy dose of sincerity to make him somewhat believable. Diaz is her same self, effervescent to the point you almost expect her to float up into the sky. With someone more grounded (there's that word again), the film may have worked better. Certainly, the connection between these two characters would have worked better.
As it is, though, we just don't see it. It's as if Roy, this super spy who leads a grand lifestyle of action and adventure closes his eyes, points out his finger at the airport, and, whoever he finds himself facing when he opens his eyes is the person he is going to fall for. You could spin it and say she represents normalcy where his life has none, but that subject is never even broached let alone explained in any acceptable detail.
These two leaps aside, the film is just as bubbly and soft-edged as Diaz seems to be. There's no sense of suspense, but the action is slick, fast, and it certainly looks good on a digital projection. Look good, I say, in that it's a bunch of bright colors flying at you 100 miles per hour. That "looking good" bit has nothing to do with the CG utilized here, which the less said about the better. The catalyst for all this slick action isn't worth bothering over. There's some super battery that is the ultimate McGuffin, even if that McGuffin becomes such a predictable plot device you know fully well where it is heading before it even gets started. There are other agents chasing after Roy and June, and, lead by Peter Sarsgaard, you would think we'd have some weighty villains. We don't, though, and Sarsgaard et al are simply wasted, lost in the ocean of colors that seem more suitable in an Impressionistic painting than an action adventure film. Really, it looks like Claude Monet served as the cinematographer here, and that's not a compliment.
But hey, there's fun to be had if you can get past all the jarring exuberance found in Knight and Day. I was only half-joking about that Simpsons comparison, but an animated version of this story may have served the story at hand better than what Mangold and his team have given us here. At least, then, how the action was shot may have better paralleled the type of action at hand. It surely would have done wonders for the Cruise/Diaz connection.
Jeremy's Rating: 5.5 out of 10
from the trailers, cruise seems to be playing his real-life self (as in totally f#cking nuts).......and i can't wait to see that!
beavis on Jun 24, 2010
This seems to have gone where I knew it would which is sad because it goes back on my blu-ray rental list and off of my spontaneous watch it at the theater during my vacation short list, unless the missus wants to catch it for the heck of it. We do love our doses of wacky Tom Cruise even if the beaten down looking and haven't been cute or cool since Charlie's Angels Diaz is in it.
Johnny Neat on Jun 24, 2010
I saw this last night and it was an absolute blast! It was funny and action-packed~ Who cares that it's not that realistic. Tom Cruise is HILARIOUS in it and Diaz works well in the role. It really is worth the watch!!
antioch on Jun 24, 2010
#3 i agree i saw the Sneak peek last week and it was a pure summer fun not the best movie but it was fun
jason on Jun 24, 2010
Agree with #3 and #4 I saw this tuesday and it was fun. It starts to burn out a bit at the end but by then you already had a fun ride. I don't know where this whole frustration with it wanting to be reality comes from. I dont think it ever really took itself seriously, there was just some weight to hammy daffy Tom Cruise character. He wasn't 100% 2d character but that didnt bother me. Just go see it for a good time.
El Guapo on Jun 24, 2010
Yeah I'm still gonna see it, Cruise is still one of myy favorites. A 5.5? what's the.5!?
Xerxex on Jun 24, 2010
Xerxes, not bad enough for a 5. Not good enough for a 6. Averages to 5.5.
Kirk on Jun 24, 2010
I knew it, another bad film of one of the worst Summers in Cinema history.
The Real Doc Brown on Jun 24, 2010
@Kirk fair enough, most logical explaination for it, thanks! P.S. There's an X. Keep up the reviews.
Xerxex on Jun 24, 2010
@8 Yup, reviewer disliked it and #3,4,5 liked it. So it's another bad film! LOL
chew on Jun 25, 2010
Tom Cruise was great-he really is a magnificent actor. It really seemed like he had fun doing this film. Not that this was really a stretch for him I'm sure. The action was fun, but I could not find the chemistry with Tom & Cameron-like at all. I'm with you Jeremy-why her? I do realize not everything has to be explained, but COME ON! Diaz-totally replaceable. Like she usually is. (except for 'Something About Mary') Crap script, odd direction, and giant leaps in the story. Just sayin...
allison on Jul 5, 2010
Do'nt mind this review. I watched the film there recently and enjoyed it alot. It deserves a 7 score rating. Tom is his usual reliable top form self. He rarely makes a bad film and he's a terrilbily underated actor. Diaz puts in a good shift 2 and they have great chemisty on screen together. All she needs 2 do though is have 2 sort out them wrinkles under her eyes put thats a minor complaint.
stephen on Aug 17, 2010
Sorry, new comments are no longer allowed.