Ridley Scott's Western + More New Info on His Alien Prequel!

June 14, 2010

Ridley Scott

Well isn't this ironic. Last night I attended the final day of the Hero Complex Film Festival, which included screenings of Alien and Blade Runner with a live Q&A with Ridley Scott in-between. I took the opportunity to ask Ridley a question I've been waiting to ask for years: Way back in late 2007 he said "sci-fi films are as dead as westerns," but now has the Alien prequel and a Forever War adaptation in the works, so what made him change his mind? Well, instead of actually answering, Ridley started to ramble on about westerns and then revealed he was "working on one" that Larry McMurtry (Brokeback Mountain) is currently writing.

So not only are sci-fi films no longer dead (Star Trek, Avatar, District 9, Moon), but apparently neither are westerns, especially if he wants to make that film sometime soon. I'm wondering if that western he's talking about might be the Boone's Lick adaptation (of his own novel) that is listed on McMurtry's IMDb page, but I suppose we'll find out sooner or later. Scott never actually gave me a straight answer to my question, but it was interesting to hear that bit about the western. And because it's Ridley Scott, I'll let it slide for now, as long as the Alien prequel turns out good. Speaking of which, he talked a little bit about that project as well.

We already know quite a bit about the prequel, from an update in April, but Scott confirmed a few details. He explained: "I sat thinking about the franchise, which now has died… And I always thought, 'no one has ever asked… who the hell is the Space Jockey?' So it's written and I'm prepping it now." So it's about the big alien who was found dead in the chair in the spaceship in the first Alien. Ridley added that it takes place "way before" Alien because he's going to try and "squeeze in" two prequels, as we already know. But why?

"Because if you explain who he was and where he comes from, then that will deal with the savagery of this version [the 1979 Alien], which is pretty savage. Then you may want to find out where they came from, so you may want to go to him, and go to there place where his people come from."

My guess is we're probably going to see a story about how this guy died, then see the backstory behind his mission and where the aliens originally came from. Interesting - kind of reminds me of The Thing prequel.

Scott then started talking about NASA and doing underwater research, then suddenly changed topics and said something about a "wonderful planet" called Europa that's near the "big gasses/gas columns" (in deep space) that were discovered around 20 years ago. I think he's confused because there's a moon of Jupiter called Europa, but no planet. He then goes on to say that "we're going back to Zeta 2 Reticuli." Now there is actually a star in our galaxy called Zeta 2 Reticuli some 39 light years away that not-so-coincidentally was discovered to have a planet orbiting it that even has creepy real-life ufo rumors linked to it. That's a bingo!

Remarkably, that's still not all he said! Although he was starting to ramble at this point, Scott stated that the "[Alien prequel] is going to go further into that world of terraforming," which is the process of modifying a planet's atmosphere to be livable. It also may explore the idea of what it will take to travel to these places. He then mentioned that if JFK had continued with the space program, we'd probably have a colony on Mars by now. Then he begins to ramble on about lightspeed and beaming people up, through dematerialization, like in Star Trek, like it's all going to be real one day soon. And finally, here's why he explained all of that:

"The closer it is to the truth, and the closer it is to the technological feasibility, then it becomes that much more interesting, and if it's a film like I'm going to do, then it becomes a lot more frightening."

I'm not exactly sure what to make of this, but I think he revealed some interesting details about the prequel. If you put the pieces together, and this is just an educated guess, it sounds like the prequel might be another spaceship thriller about the "space jockey" from Alien and that will lead into another prequel about where he came from. That gels with the statement that they would "stick with the original concept of only one alien on the ship" as announced last year. And he may also be mixing in ideas about lightspeed and dematerialization as a way of intensifying the sci-fi horror, which also sounds like it may involve humans traveling to this Zeta 2 Reticuli system, where we'll encounter this "space jockey," as there have to be some humans in the movie.

At least that's one possibility, but I'll leave it up to you guys to make what you will of all this. I pulled all of these quotes from my own recording of the Q&A, so I know they're accurate. It's always great to hear about future Ridley Scott projects, but this Alien prequel sounds like it's going to be very interesting. And speaking of which, in regards to The Forever War, Scott said they're currently on the fourth draft of that screenplay because it's such a complex story to adapt. Any idea what he's talking about with the Alien prequel?

Update: Quint of Ain't It Cool News also pulled this interesting quote from the Scott Q&A: "I think beneath that [Space Jockey] carcass… it's not a carcass, it's a suit. Inside the suit is a being." Even more to chew on!

Find more posts: Feat, Movie News, Opinions



Seriously, Scott sounds like he's babbling. As much as I love the first three films, I doubt even Scott can save this from suckage. Scott hasn't made a decent film for years, and from what I've heard, they're having major script problems. I hope I'm proven wrong, but a space jockey? Really? One of the things that made Alien so great was the mystery behind the space jockey. Do we really need to know?

Brad Clooney on Jun 14, 2010


Need and want are two different things.. Personally, I want and would love to see the story behind the space jockey and look forward to it with great anticipation.

CJ on Jun 14, 2010


No way they're going to make the space jockey the main character though, he was kind of a giant ugly Alien himself lest you forget. I'll bet dollars to donuts it's about some sort of away team, unless of course they go the whole Avatar approach, which is entirely possible, of course. Would be interesting to add an Alien species besides Xenomorphs to the Alien universe, so far the Space Jockey is the only other species besides human and alien thats ever shown. Of course they don't really seem too dholes or surprised at witnessing his body, so maybe I'm wrong. It just seems weird. Honestly, I think originally not much thought was given to the space jockey and it must have been more of a bizarre art choice than anything. It's basically just a weird Giger sculpture anyways.

Linkfx on Jun 14, 2010


With the Alien and the Space Jockey I don't feel like there were any expectations. It was a weird addition but on that caught peoples eye. Now if he tries to explain it, it adds a tremendous amount of pressure and if this wasn't thought out previously, I don't see it coming together just for the sake of it. I pray there was some prior development regarding the space jockey otherwise I have a feeling it will be a hacked up process.

Matthew on Jun 14, 2010


I have ALWAYS wondered about the Space Jockey. I'd love to see it addressed in the prequel, but I agree with #4, there is a lot of pressure after 30 years of speculation.

Craig on Jun 14, 2010


Agreed with #1 on "Do we really need to know?" I think one of the things that is great is that you (#5) ARE ALWAYS wondering and ALWAYS WILL... what I'm saying is, somebody has done their job right if this is the case. If you've been thinking about it a lot, you've got a spiderweb of plot pathways in your head, most of which are likely going to be better than this film. At the very least, this film will (likely) map out precisely one of those possibilities. This works forward as well as back - I wish I could UN-SEE the last two Aliens movies and just go back to wondering what happened to Ripley, Newt, Hicks, and Bishop. Perhaps I'm bitter.

dRailer on Jun 14, 2010


If anyone out there has the Alien -Director's Cut- check out what Mr. Scott has to say about the space jockey on the audio commentary. Interesting.

gordo on Jun 14, 2010


The disappointing way most of Ridley's recent movies have turned out, this is something I would rather not know... Keep the Space Jockey a mystery.

casting couch on Jun 14, 2010


Surely it's not the Space Jockey that's interesting but the Company. Why was the Nostromo crew expendable? What was happening back on Earth? Did they know that such alien lifeforms existed in order to have such a company policy?

AeonTown on Jun 14, 2010


Wasn't he going to do a "The Warriors" remake and fuck it up to hell and back?

Syphous on Jun 14, 2010


it better be good 🙁

DaftPUNKFAN on Jun 14, 2010


@10 Uh-uh, you're talking about the "other" Scott, man

chew on Jun 15, 2010


"I sat thinking about the franchise, which now has died… And I always thought, 'no one has ever asked… who the hell is the Space Jockey?".... Wrong...LOTS of people have been asking that very question/...I asked that question when Alien premiered...why all this acting like you (Scott) had some great new idea ???

blasphemer on Jun 15, 2010


I dont think Ridley was talking about actually bringing THE space jockey from the first Alien back to the screen but instead, one of HIS PEOPLE! The one in the chair, or should I say the one that WAS the chair, in Alien was fosiliised, fossilisation takes thousands of years, not thirty years! The space jockey should have been left mysterious anyway. It and the alien itself were what gave the first film the feel that you were seeing something that was truly alien, and different from anything ever seen before, something that was very old and came from some unknowable place in the furthest and darkest regions of space. It truly represented the definition of the word Alien in its strictest sense. Its design and life cycle were truly unique and inspired and really stood out as something for the audience to discover that they had never seen, or imagined before in cinema. Why dont they do that again, instead of mining the damned thing to bits. Its possible, all it needs is creativity, alas. You said it blasphemer!

Pat on Aug 11, 2010


Ok i think that the alien movies are great but the alien vs predator could have been cool if they hadnt gone off topic. The franchise died and if they add a prequel it may just become overkill like alien vs predator(even though the predalien was freakin awesome) The prequel has to be major kickass or the proposed two part sequel or trilogy will be impossible. The alien movies areamazing but overkill is overkill, and they need to redeem the alien franchise.

Jack on Oct 19, 2010

New comments are no longer allowed on this post.



Subscribe to our feed or daily newsletter:

Follow Alex's main account on Twitter:

For only the latest posts - follow this:

Add our posts to your Feedlyclick here

Get all the news sent on Telegram Telegram