Universal Developing a New 'Scarface' That's Not a Sequel or Remake

September 21, 2011
Source: Deadline


The fact that studios don't have the balls to develop an original story without the help of established brands or intellectual property is maddening. The plots of films like Battleship and Hot Wheels would work fine by themselves without the help of the brands studios are attempting to "adapt" for the big screen. Now Universal is trying the same old schtick with a "new version" of Scarface. The original film was a controversial black and white gangster film in 1932 and would later become the iconic 1983 crime drama starring Al Pacino. This new film will not, however, be a sequel or remake of the two films. More below!

Deadline says this story will take the common elements of the first two films to follow an outsider immigrant who makes his way into organized crime in an attempt to achieve the coveted American dream. In the process he becomes one of the most powerful crime kingpins of his time through ruthless violence and ambition. I'm not sure how that doesn't qualify this new project as a remake, but there you have it. Details on the origins of the lead character (who may or may not still be called Tony) are being kept under wraps, but the first two films took place in Chicago and Miami respectively. Maybe this new version will head to New York? Either way, I'm not happy with the studio pretending they're not trying to bank on a familiar name and story for a "new" film.

Find more posts: Development, Movie News



They tried to pull a fast one and failed. It is a remake.

Xerxexx on Sep 21, 2011


It sure is and an unnecessary one.

A Villa88 on Sep 22, 2011



Xerxexx on Sep 22, 2011


Why take the risk with an original idea while they can remake off of iconic movies and make big bucks? That must be the question the studios are asking themselves. Anything with a familiar name will draw in the crowd young and old alike. Next thing you know we'll be hearing about some edgy Barbie movie that will be reminiscent of Legally Blond. I'm a little surprised they haven't jumped on 2001: A space Odyssey and make it more "grittier". With the Lion King 3-D being a success in theatres I suppose that is why they are pushing these "redone" movies because whats the point in taking a chance with a film that may not make big bucks...

Anonymous on Sep 21, 2011


'Gotta have the Scarface poster'. Always on MTV cribs. It's funny that folk don't get that Scarface is a cautionary tale and see it as and aspire to be like the strange sister-lusting cokehead. Everyone knows cocaine is for dicks.

Crapola on Sep 21, 2011


He really wanted his sister all to himself. It was too bold a dream.

Xerxexx on Sep 21, 2011


he he ge. It's good to have dreams I suppose

Crapola on Sep 22, 2011


yeah no matther how creepy they are. hang on to your dreams kids...unless a shotgun shell blast through your spinal cord.

Xerxexx on Sep 22, 2011


Seems to me like there are only three ways they could go: 1) A small town white trash psycho "hits it big" in the not-so-glamorous world of meth. This probably would draw too many comparisons to Breaking Bad, though it would fit the theme of the previous two films quite well and the incest subplot would be a no-brainer. 2) Mexican/illegal alien hits it big in the border drug trade but gets caught up between the DEA and some nasty cartel bosses. This seems the more obvious choice, and ripe for some serious political and drug war commentary. 3) Stupid, brainless drug and violence glorification MTV-style with video game tie-in and absolutely nothing to say. Which route will they go???

Derek McCumber on Sep 21, 2011


I'm still waiting for them to remake The Jersey Shore with Charlie Sheen.

Anonymous on Sep 21, 2011


I think it is bullshit. you know they are running out of ideas with movies when they start remaking classics. Bullshit i tell ya bullshit

wild_boi on Sep 21, 2011


o well

Croniccris on Sep 21, 2011


Hollywood has failed.

Big Boss on Sep 21, 2011


I suppose from a money making view it's worth them making this movie and mentioning that it is not a remake because it will cause people to want to watch it and get them a lot of publicity by enraged movie bloggers. But why pick popular movies to remake or be influenced by, why not take something which didn't do so well and is forgotten about and try and make it better.

Andy on Sep 22, 2011


Yeah no doubt it's a remake but lets not forget so was DePalma's Scarface

Japetto on Sep 22, 2011


It would be hard for anyone who read this to forget that, since it's in the article

Cbfawley on Sep 22, 2011


Yeah but there's this idea going around that you cant remake a classic (DePalma's Scarface)

Japetto on Sep 22, 2011


"The plots of films like Battleship would work fine by themselves" HA HA how has nobody jumped on that one before me?! There are a lot of sub-par remakes/everydaymovies being produced out there and if you've payed to see one you're adding to the problem. They only make them because they bring in the money simple as    

Richie G on Sep 22, 2011


Great, now we have a new Scarface for a bunch of teens to buy merchandise and act all hard but yet will never see. Most don't even know like stated that Scarface with Pacino was a remake. Ignorance at it's finest.

The Douche on Sep 22, 2011


So now we get a Mexican drug lord. Guess this means work for George Lopez.

happy camper on Sep 22, 2011


As long as it's called Scarface, then it's a remake! Who does Hollyweird think they're fooling?

jah p on Sep 22, 2011


cmon guys, its a Re-TELLING! lol... I dunno..the Howard Hawks original is still pretty bad ass! pacino scarface still holds up too..I guess you can "modernize" it..maybe a russian immigrant or some other relevant country but at this point, any variation on that starting at the bottom and fighting your way to the top and wanting to fck your sister is still just a remake! unless you look at it as a franchise (I think they already are) and just plan on remaking or modernizing it every 20 years... Out of curiosity, How many people here would pay money to see the original black and white in the theaters? I would...

lando on Sep 22, 2011


Just rewatched this, then read some trivia: "When Scarface was re-released in theaters in 2003, the studio wanted Brian De Palma to change the soundtrack so that rap songs inspired by the movie could be used. De Palma refused."

hhv on Sep 22, 2011


every hip hop gangster film (Illegal Tender, Empire, State Property, Paid In Full, Belly, etc.) has been a re-imagining of Scarface, some of them have actually been pretty good. How will this one be any different?

........................ on Sep 22, 2011

New comments are no longer allowed on this post.



Subscribe to our feed -or- daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main account on twitter:
For the latest posts only - follow this one:

Add our updates to your Feedly - click here

Get the latest posts sent in Telegram Telegram