How the Industry Evolves: 'Diana' Strikes Photo Deal with Paparazzi

September 27, 2012
Source: THR

Naomi Watts as Diana

One of the many movie currently shooting right now is Diana, about the final years of Princess Diana, starring Naomi Watts as Diana and being directed by Oliver Hirschbiegel. The film will apparently address the "siege" of paparazzi that followed Diana around, who some blame her death on. We featured an official first look photo back in July, but word is that the production, which filmed in Croatia and around the UK, has also been besieged by paparazzi (as expected). A few weeks ago I wrote about how damaging this can be, and in an intriguing turn of events, the production struck a deal with paparazzi for the "best photo angles".

So this is how the industry evolves. After writing that RoboCop set photo editorial, complaining both about set photos as well as the lack of concern/response from Hollywood, I seemed to notice a muted but evident reaction in some minor ways. On the RoboCop set, the very next day they draped actor Joel Kinnaman in a cheesy monk-like black cape to cover up his outfit while he was walking around. (Sorry, but that's not going to make a difference guys.) Now I'm hearing about this paparazzi deal and it seems to be the first time (as far as I've heard) a production has tried to actually control and get involved with the paparazzi themselves.

The news on Diana comes from Hollywood Reporter. They say that Ecosse Films, the production company behind Diana (formerly Caught in Flight), struck a deal with paparazzi organizations Splash News & Picture Agency that allowed them to have "access to the best photo angles." The results haven't been impressive, and if you do a Google Image search there's not many good shots that stand out (but the best ones are probably sold to gossip magazines). Then again, this is a good strategy to use the gossip/paparazzi attention the film will unquestionably get to build positive buzz, and not negative disinterest. The film's rep is quoted saying: "We knew we would have to deal with the situation, so we got out in front of it." Exactly! Smart.

Looks like the industry is evolving. But this isn't Hollywood. This is an independent production, mostly based out of the UK (where paparazzi run rampant as well), and it was a very crafty decision specifically for this film. Even THR picks up on the odd irony of a film about the paparazzi causing Princess Diana's death striking a deal with the paparazzi so that they get good photos of them filming. But I like this. Despite never caring to look at any of these photos anyway, at least it's a step in the right direction. Progress. The industry can and does evolve in its own ways. So which movie will be the next to follow up and strike a deal like this?

Find more posts: Discuss, Indies, Movie News



i wonder if the film will also address her jetset, party lifestyle? i mean, it isn't like she died saving homeless kids from violence - she and her billionaire, playboy boyfriend died as a result of a night of partying their asses off - and it cost them. on the main topic - good article, nothing is simple any more - is it?

beevis on Sep 27, 2012


Diana was ledge Beevis, she'd fly into war zones, get the rubber gloves on and touch the shit out of aids babies, soon as the camera's god the dying kid in that deer-faced beauty's hands she'd be back to the speedboats in some horrid place like Monaco. She saved no-one. Charity is the biggest scam going. I always liked the picture below, by Gerald Scarfe in regards to her strange press addiction. I reckon the queen had her killed as she was possibly going to dirty up the bloodline.

Carpola on Sep 27, 2012


the whole notion of "royalty" is ridiculous to me. that "queen" is just some doddering, withered up inbred who spends hundreds of thousands of dollars on shopping sprees and laughs doing it. the very notion of "royalty" should be done away with on a worldwide scale.....same as sheiks and sultans in other countries - what a joke.

beevis on Sep 27, 2012


Right on Beevis! In the old days, a king was just the biggest thug in the Land, now it's just a business, well not much really has changed. Same business, just a different approach.

Carpola on Sep 27, 2012


This book on Amazon is well worth a read, Princess Diana The Day She Didn't Die

Sue Newman on Sep 28, 2012

New comments are no longer allowed on this post.



Subscribe to our feed -or- daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main account on twitter:
For the latest posts only - follow this one:

Add our updates to your Feedly - click here

Get the latest posts sent in Telegram Telegram