Prima Cinema Promises 'Theatrically-Released' Movies in Your Home

November 27, 2012
Source: Uncrate

Prima Cinema

No, this isn't an ad for some illegal download site, this is an actual legitimate company - offering exactly that. How much would you actually pay "to screen a theatrically-released film in their home"? How about around $500 a movie. That's the estimated price per picture for Prima Cinema, a new California-based company that has finally installed its first home entertainment system to distribute what they claim are theatrical run movies at home. It came up as a $20,000 (per year) listing on Uncrate, but the actual official website seems to carefully skirt around specific details regarding first-run films. Is this really going to work?

According to the website for Prima Cinema, which was first announced in press releases in 2010 (see THR), the service is based out of a rack-mountable box that they claim can provide: "PRIMA Cinema presents theatrically-released Hollywood films, in the comfort of your home… Until PRIMA Cinema, only a select few entertainment insiders were able to screen a theatrically-released film in their home. No longer." Well how about that! The site explains a "PRIMA Cinema Player and the PRIMA Biometric Reader [a fingerprint scanner?]. Films are automatically delivered to the PRIMA Cinema Player over broadband." So it's just downloadable new release movies in a proprietary, expensive set-top box. Let's dig a little deeper into this.

Prima Cinema

If you take a closer look at the investors on their site, it lists a few key names: "backed by Best Buy Capital, the investment arm of Fortune 500 global retailer Best Buy Co., Inc., Universal Pictures, a major motion picture/television studio and distributor, as well as Syncom Venture Partners, a venture capital firm specializing in media and communications." This might just be the same Universal that experimented with that $60 home release of Tower Heist, that never actually happened because movie theaters started to balk. Prima's Board of Advisors also contains some very notable Hollywood figures: ex-MPAA head Sid Ganis, director Peter Farrelly, Fox's Ira Rubenstein, and NetJet's Lauren Fryefield, among others.

I hate to say it, but this entire service kind of sounds like the paid non-pirated version of theatrical movies for rich people. If you can afford the outrageous "one-time fee of about $20,000 for a digital-delivery system and an additional $500 per film" (via Wall Street Journal 2010), you can get these movies in your home. Though the website doesn't list specifics, it sounds like it may only be Universal and/or Fox movies, considering they've got imagery from Bourne Legacy in every photo. But nonetheless, they're trying to get back into the game of non-pirated theatrical release movies at home, but with a select demographic it seems.

If you're interested in checking this out, visit That website lacks quite a bit of actual info on the service, and even the FAQ is considerably vague, besides promising that "PRIMA Cinema… will support 3D films." Hooray…? I wish they had a more specific pricing info, details on when exactly movies will be available (upon release or a few weeks later?) and which studio's films are "supported", if limited. Still, an interesting new development in the release game that seems to be quietly sneaking out - the first install was in June, quoting a $35,000 price. Will expensive home offerings change Hollywood? Thoughts?

Find more posts: Discuss, Movie News



that's a ridiculous waste of money. and maybe i'm missing something, alex....but, how would something so expensive change hollywood? 90% of the homes can't afford this. i do think the idea of paying to see films (still at the theatre) at home for a price is a good one. i'd certainly be willing to pay 10 dollars a film (500 dollars is a joke) - but i wouldn't be willing to invest 20,000 dollars in the delivery system - that's just crazy

beevis on Nov 27, 2012


host a viewing party with a door charge...really the only way i see this working

Anthony Ceniccola on Nov 27, 2012


Never complaining about 12 dollar movie tickets again...

Ray Hartley on Nov 27, 2012


I don't get why they dont just make it something reasonable.. I would pay 20 bucks a movie to watch at home. When Indies dont make it to the theatre at my house I either am too lazy to go drive and see it, or i use graboid and watch a bootleg.

BANDIT on Nov 27, 2012


meant theatre by my house.. and most of the time I just wait until VOD.

BANDIT on Nov 27, 2012


Unable to comment. Still bewildered by the price.

Isildur_of_Numenor on Nov 27, 2012


Its just something about hanging out with a bunch of hardworking folks who want to sit back and share an experience. the rich can hole themselves up for all I care

mooreworthy on Nov 27, 2012


Well there market is very small...the top 1%

Cody W on Nov 27, 2012


Nothing beats going to theater and watching a movie on opening day.

Ron on Nov 27, 2012


It's perfect for Mitt Romney...

The Truth on Nov 27, 2012


"$20,000 for a digital-delivery system and an additional $500 per film". Hmmmm. It's the $500 I have a problem If it were a one-time-fee of $20,000 and unlimited movies, hmmmm. Prices tend to drop, maybe this will land on ($10,000 for "installation") and $150 per film within a few years? With $500 a film, it would cost me over $125,000 a year on not leaving my home theater. I haven't studied their website yet, but I take it all of the $20,000+ goes to PRIMA, and the film studioes only see, what, 50% of the $500? Atm, PRIMA is for the 1% of the 1%, not the 10% (of 100%) as someone else here mentioned. I'm gunna laugh when I see this in some movie, discretely added like McIntosh in The Departed or the turntable in The Game 🙂

David Banner on Nov 28, 2012


Of course the fee is astronomical right now.....but I truly believe that in a few years we will be able to screen theatrical release films at home for a fair price. The way we watch television and films on our mobile devices has taken a huge leap in just 5 years. The market for ON DEMAND entertainment is huge and it's only getting bigger and more advanced. I think it will take a big name title to really gage the reaction of consumers but I'd be happy to pay say £20-£30 (around $50) to view the latest film in the comfort of my own home (it would cost me that much to take my wife to the local flea pit theatre any way!). As someone said in a previous comment it would be like buying a pay per view event and inviting some friends around to make a night of it...which as a concept really works.

Danny Lee on Nov 28, 2012


but why should consumers have to pay MORE to watch it in their own home? it shouldn't be any more than the price of a ticket at the theatre. right now, PPV usually runs around 4-7 dollars (depending on area).

beevis on Nov 28, 2012


Well I guess the argument would be that I could in effect show the film to dozens of people in my own home (if I had the room!) so a more substantial fee would be fair in my eyes. It would work for big tent pole movies such as The Hobbit or the end of the day it's all about giving the consumer more options. Perhaps after the first two weeks of release the price could come down by 50%. I realize that this would have an impact of theaters, but my argument would be that I very rarely see a screening more than half full these days. I took my wife to see the final twilight film on opening day and there were about 20 people in there! Surely it makes sense to reach the largest possible audience? And for me the answer is to release movies on every format possible (on rental basis). I'll admit it's a bold step but i think it's going to happen sooner rather than later.

Danny Lee on Nov 29, 2012


well - i'm far from an expert in this sort of thing from a legal perspective; but, it seems like there would be laws keeping people from doing that. of course, you could do it and hope you're not caught. i don't think i'd want that many different people in my home. i really think it's just a matter of time till the films are distributed via satellite (or however) that is more cost effective. i'd be very excited about being able to watch first-run films at home. thanks for the interesting reply.

beevis on Nov 29, 2012


Well when I was in Vegas staying at New York New York back in 2005 I remember being able to purchase a first run film, (which was still in the theatre) in my hotel room for 10.00 or so. This is not new, and is possible at a reasonable price that all could afford if sold on a massive level, hence why Best Buy may be an investor in this. Also Dish Network has had some movies (maybe 3 or so that I can remember that were in the theatre but I was able to buy the VOD and watch it at home, the one I did watch at home was Red State, I think it was 15.00 to watch at home. The biggest reason this may be hard to do wide spread is that the Theatre owners will give major push back.

SithTRR on Nov 28, 2012


i can see that one has money

BornRich on Nov 29, 2012

New comments are no longer allowed on this post.



Subscribe to our feed -or- daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main account on twitter:
For the latest posts only - follow this one:

Add our updates to your Feedly - click here

Get the latest posts sent in Telegram Telegram