Review: 'Taken 2' is Just Lazy Action Undeserving of Liam Neeson
by Jeremy Kirk
October 5, 2012
It's good knowing Liam Neeson is out there making worthwhile action and being extraordinarily classy doing it. He's become the action star we've wanted but never really deserved, and films like Taken 2 are the reason why. Sadly they had to take Neeson down with them. All the typical punch-and-kick action you would expect from a Luc Besson-written-and-produced follow-up with none of the intrigue and even less of the charm, Taken 2 is even less than a brainless but fun time at the movie theaters. It's lazy. It was good having Neeson around at first, but now the Hollywood machine has just turned him into another cliche. Read on!
As the title suggests - They thankfully decided against the more obvious Taken, Too - there's another kidnapping and another series of action set pieces to reunite loved one in peril from loved one who likes punching and shooting people. This time around, Neeson's Bryan Mills, the man with a "certain set of skills," is the one taken along with his ex-wife, played once again by Famke Janssen. The couple and their daughter, the returning Maggie Grace, find themselves on vacation in Istanbul, Bryan's attempt at reconciling with his wife as strong as his willingness to memorize every turn in the city. What he wasn't expecting, though, was the father of henchmen he killed retrieving his daughter in Paris in Taken.
Besson and Robert Mark Kamen, both returning screenwriters from the predecessor, make every attempt at fleshing out their villain here, the subplot of a father losing his son and the drive for revenge against our film's protagonist an interesting one. Rade Serbedzija, a cliche unto himself when it comes to action movie villains, froths about his murdered loved ones, but even though the emotion may be on the page, it's rarely pushed through to the final film.
The "Thank You" card for that can be sent to director Olivier Megaton, whose work on action films like Transporter 3 and Columbiana never even came close to living up to that name. He's strictly a point-and-shoot director, never creating anything of interest with his frame or working to pump up the energy within any individual shot. There's a lot of fast-paced cutting in Taken 2, almost as much as there are closeups and shaky camera work, but none of it amounts to anything. Certain action scenes deliver just the right amount of excitement you would want or expect, but there's never a sense the director is reaching for something greater than a substandard actioner. That's precisely what he delivers.
The detachment in interest allows moviegoers to find the humor in Besson and Kamen's screenplay, something it provides on a number of occasions. As Bryan and his wife are the ones taken, it's up to their daughter to find her way to them and working them free of their captors. Lucky them and not us, Bryan is just as good explaining his skills as he is utilizing them, and by the time he has his daughter chucking grenades throughout Istanbul as a sort-of sonar to find one another, the movie has completely fallen into comedy territory. At least it's good for a few laughs or the thought of Maggie Grace turning into an action star might have you reaching for a cigarette to put out in your eye.
Neeson's air of badassery is always on display, even when it appears the actor is sleepwalking through his part. The laziness in Taken 2 doesn't stop with Megaton's directing or Besson and Kamen's screenplay. Lines like "I killed your son, because he took my daughter" might have some kind of emotional resonance if the actor delivering them is fully on board. Neeson doesn't seem to be for much of Taken 2, and his delivery of the line "I'm tired of it all" late in the film says it all. It's in the way he turned "tired" into a word that has three or four syllables. At least he creates that presence, or else his character would seem as pointless as the three buddies back home who still don't do anything after two movies. Seriously, why is Jon Gries in this movie?
And like Neeson, fans of action are tired of the cliche-ridden, assembly-line movies they should be enjoying. Likely, Neeson and even the younger, action counterparts like Jason Statham and Dwayne Johnson will have ups and downs in the world of action films. Some will be huge crowd-pleasers with an abundance of clever action and engaging storytelling, while others will fall on the side of Taken 2, a lame attempt at continuing a franchise that's already scraping the bottom of its well two movies in. It comes and goes without a fleeting hint of sticking around in your brain, but even on surface-level entertainment value, it's grip is shaky at best. At times, though, it works well as a comedy.
Jeremy's Rating: 4 out of 10
once the name olivier megaton is attached don't bother
me on Oct 5, 2012
Once again you have no idea what you are talking about, why are you complaining about cliches when you know every single movie in Hollywood has them, that's one thing everyone knows. Second of all lazy attempt? Have you watched the first Taken film, this is just a mere continuity of that original story which it deserves. Liam Neeson is a great actor in all of his films and I'm disappointed in your review like always, I can't believe you gave that Red Dawn remake crap a higher rating than this, at least they were trying to be more original with the sequel this time around much like how The Hangover 2 was done well.
JerseyBoy on Oct 5, 2012
Have you seen the movie? this has a rating of like 10% on rotten tomatoes, so pretty much everyone who has seen the film agrees. "you have no idea what your talking about" applies to people who disagree with a review without seeing the movie
Neo on Oct 5, 2012
jerseyboy - i'm only trying to offer some constructive criticism when i say NOBODY LISTENS TO WHAT YOU SAY.........due to the fact that every one of your posts is nothing but an angry rant. why not (once in a while) try to bring something to the forum that can be viewed as part of the conversation and not just hostility.
beevis on Oct 5, 2012
I'm torn. One one hand, Jeremy gives Dredd 3D an 8/10 and Expendables 2 a 6/10. Which means he loves pulpy action movies. So I should take his word for it if he thinks an action movie stinks. On the other hand, he gave Dredd 3D am 8/10 and Expendables 2 a 6/10. Which means he isn't objective. So there's no baseline, and therefore no credibility. *Sigh.*
Jim on Oct 5, 2012
while i haven't seen this - i got the same feelings (as jeremy) from the trailer. i'm sure LN had to do this because of the success of the first one - but it's too bad this second movie was made........neeson is MUCH better than this kind of cheap sequel crap.
beevis on Oct 5, 2012
He did the Phantom Menace a cheap prequel/sequel to the original Star Wars films...BURNED!!!!
JerseyBoy on Oct 5, 2012
Oh and Zeus in the sequel to Clash of The Titans...da da da... WRATH OF THE TITANS! - plays small violin- Does the last Narnia sequel also count?
JerseyBoy on Oct 5, 2012
your comments make no sense to my post. did i say he hasn't done other ridiculous roles like this one???? NO- i said he was better than doing this kind of cheap sequel crap- which would be inclusive of ANY of these types of roles. you - and anyone who agrees with you need to practice your reading comprehension skills. or maybe you suffer from attention deficit disorder....or maybe you're just an idiot - my guess would be idiot.
beevis on Oct 6, 2012
I'm going to watch it anyway. Then I'll decide if I like it. As the saying goes "opinions are like assholes - everybody's got one..."
Paul Hepburn on Oct 5, 2012
New comments are no longer allowed on this post.