Paramount Contemplating 'Wolf of Wall Street' Delay Due to Runtime
Before the first trailer for Martin Scorsese's newest film The Wolf of Wall Street arrived, the film was already on the list of my most anticipated films of the year. Then after seeing the trailer, the Leonardo DiCaprio led film was definitely on our list of 21 movies we were still excited to see in the second half of 2013. But now, there's a chance we might have to wait even longer to see the promising adaptation of Jordan Belfort's book which chronicles the man's wild real life endeavors including drugs, sex, and globe-trotting, and a binge that sank a 170-foot motor yacht, crashed a Gulfstream jet, and ran up a $700,000 hotel tab.
THR has word that Paramount Pictures is currently considering a release date shift for the film which is currently slated to hit theaters on November 15th as the film will not be ready by then. Supposedly the cut of the film as of now is 180 minutes, and he's talking with producers about how to shorten the film. A three-hour cut of the film doesn't sound bad at all, so we're not sure why Paramount just doesn't release it, but HitFix points out that the first cut currently contains things that would likely get the film an NC-17 rating, and that's obviously something that the studio doesn't want to deal with. In addition, this means the film will not be ready for a sneak peek screening at the New York Film Festival.
But the question is, if the film gets delayed, will Paramount push it back to December in order to keep it in awards contention, or will they push it to early 2014 instead? HItFix points out that Paramount previously moved Scorsese's Shutter Island from October of 2009 to February of 2010, and it worked pretty well for the studio. But the studio could fare just as well if they decide to give The Wolf of Wall Street the Christmas release date (if the film is finished by then) currently occupied by Jack Ryan: Shadow One, and push back the Chris Pine led action thriller to January 17th, 2014. It's quite the sticky situation, but we're hoping the film is finished before the end of the year so it qualifies for the Oscars.
It's MARTIN SCORSESE!!! Why can't the studios just let us watch the film as it was meant to be seen? I'd love to watch a 3 hour Scorsese movie!
CShane on Sep 25, 2013
If only corporate execs thought like this..
DavideCoppola on Sep 25, 2013
You're a schmuck! What if the 3-hour film isn't as good as the two hour and a half film? It's happened before and it'll happen again. Sometimes, less is more. Three hours and NC-17? Nobody would watch the film except the most die-hard film fans. Sitting down for three hours is more difficult than you think fool.
KelVintage on Sep 29, 2013
If they do push it back to 2014, it'd be nice if we get a trailer re-do...one sans Kanye West.
cuckoozey on Sep 25, 2013
I loved that Kanye song in the trailer. I'm not even trolling. Though I do hope it's not in the movie.
timothyzila on Sep 25, 2013
I wait for the day when a studio can release dual edits of the same film. I don't feel that we live in a time where people who wanted to see a hard R Scorsese film will be turned off from an NC-17 label. Give the consumers what the director wants.
Tyler Morgan on Sep 25, 2013
This is Scorsese, what did they expect?
timothyzila on Sep 25, 2013
Sorry, new comments are no longer allowed.