'Ninja Turtles' Director Taking on 'Unforgiven'-esque King Arthur Tale

March 20, 2015
Source: Deadline

Jonathan Liebesman

If a retelling of Romeo & Juliet in the style of 300 didn't sound good, maybe a different approach to King Arthur will be more your speed. No, we're not talking about Guy Ritchie's new Knights of the Round Table: King Arthur (in production now), but rather a new project called Man at Arms that is being developed by Thunder Road Pictures. This project has Wrath of the Titans and Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles reboot director Jonathan Liebesman attached to direct the film that is said to take the King Arthur story we all know, but deliver it in the style of Clint Eastwood's modern classic western Unforgiven. So how'll that work?

Well, Deadline says the story is said to follow Sir Lancelot as an older gentleman who wants to make amends after his love for Guinivere (which she gave right back to him) actually ended up ruining King Arthur's Camelot. That's an interesting approach to the material. And it will also allow some older actors to step into the roles as opposed to the young bucks who keep taking all the gigs nowadays. The script comes from Jeremy Lott, who also just delivered a new take on Robin Hood to Sony Pictures, appropriately called Hood. Coincidentally, Joby Harold, who wrote Ritchie's King Arthur flick, also has a competing Robin Hood project out there too. It's a small world when everyone is making the same movies in Hollywood.

Find more posts: Development, Movie News



No...Liebesman is awful.

DAVIDPD on Mar 20, 2015


Well personally I don't know how some of these directors keep getting projects. I thought Wrath of the Titans and TMNT were terrible movies.

Mike Avallone on Mar 21, 2015


who in heavens name is interested in a new King Arthur story? Make one of vlad tepes, now that's a historical figure who deserves his own movie! O wait, it's was a successful psychopath and Hollywood is only interested in fake legends with a high morality...

ari smulders on Mar 22, 2015


Wasn't even King Arthur a Crusader? Hardly moral men, murderers for Christ/(Church Money), seems he was high up on the psycho level, just he was down with Jesuz and magic, he he.

Carpola on Mar 22, 2015

New comments are no longer allowed on this post.



Subscribe to our feed -or- daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main account on twitter:
For the latest posts only - follow this one:

Add our updates to your Feedly - click here

Get the latest posts sent in Telegram Telegram