MOVIE TRAILERS

A Final Trailer for Guy Ritchie's 'King Arthur' Starring Charlie Hunnam

by
April 1, 2017
Source: YouTube

King Arthur Final Trailer

"I know your story… What kind of man would you have become…?" Warner Bros has revealed one final trailer for Guy Ritchie's new take on King Arthur: Legend of the Sword, which opens in theaters in just over a month. Is anyone excited to see this movie? I feel like it's going to be forgotten so quickly. But maybe this footage will change your mind? Or maybe not. Charlie Hunnam stars as the new King Arthur with a cast including Jude Law, Annabelle Wallis, Katie McGrath, Eric Bana, Djimon Hounsou, Astrid Bergès-Frisbey, Tom Wu, as well as Aidan Gillen. Guy Ritchie's signature style (and action) seems to be the biggest selling point of this, but maybe there's something to the story, too. The elephants revealed in this are pretty crazy, reminds me of Lord of the Rings, which is probably the point. Will you be seeing this?

Here's the third trailer (+ poster) for Guy Ritchie's King Arthur: Legend of the Sword, from YouTube:

King Arthur: Legend of the Sword Poster

You can still watch the first official trailer for Guy Ritchie's King Arthur here, plus the second trailer here.

When the child Arthur’s father is murdered, Vortigern (Jude Law), Arthur’s uncle, seizes the crown. Robbed of his birthright and with no idea who he truly is, Arthur comes up the hard way in the back alleys of the city. But once he pulls the sword from the stone, his life is turned upside down and he is forced to acknowledge his true legacy… whether he likes it or not. King Arthur: Legend of the Sword is directed by British filmmaker Guy Ritchie, of Snatch, Revolver, RocknRolla, Sherlock Holmes, A Game of Shadows and The Man from U.N.C.L.E. previously. The screenplay is written by Joby Harold, updated by Guy Ritchie & Lionel Wigram. Warner Bros will release King Arthur in theaters starting May 12th, 2017 this summer.

Find more posts: To Watch, Trailer

Discover more around the web:

Reader Feedback - 22 Comments

1

Humm...Yeah... Reminds me of Assassin's creed.

tarek on Apr 1, 2017

2

I think it would be better to play video game than watch a film made this way. Even films with superheroes look more promising than this ...

shiboleth on Apr 1, 2017

3

I can understand why people think this could bomb. And I'm not fan of Hunnam. But God damn this looks good.

Jon Odishaw on Apr 1, 2017

4

Assassin's creed also looked good. It ended up as yet another blockbuster full of stunts and zero soul. I have a bad feeling about this ( with Solo's voice)

tarek on Apr 1, 2017

5

I finally saw assassin's creed two weeks ago. I expected 17 percent on RT awful but, as a fan of the games, I was pleasantly surprised. I would go as far as to say that it was good. Faltered in the final act though.

Jon Odishaw on Apr 1, 2017

6

Glad you liked it. It didn't work for me. It was obvious they were trying to start a franchise and not to make a good movie. They threw in every thing related to the A.C games just to please the A.C fans and not because it served the story. I would do without the animus part if a sequel is to be made.

tarek on Apr 1, 2017

7

Me too me too! I have reasonable expectations.

DAVIDPD on Apr 1, 2017

8

*my obligatory Real RocknRolla comment*

grimjob on Apr 1, 2017

9

!!

DAVIDPD on Apr 1, 2017

10

Now that you talked about the deletion issue, I got two posts deleted this last two weeks. I couldn't figure out why, as it was harmless comments. Which makes me think the Matrix is going nuts.

tarek on Apr 1, 2017

11

Ha. The Matrix is indeed going nuts! If it was the screengrabs of Wonder Woman's butt, then yes, I deleted those. 😉 You can tweet them, put them on Tumblr, whatever, just felt they weren't right for the comments on this site.

Alex Billington on Apr 1, 2017

12

Did I do that? I don't remember posting any wonder woman picture lately. Or did I? Now it's me who's going nuts. ;D

tarek on Apr 1, 2017

13

Ha. I forget who it was, but someone was posting Wonder Woman photos... Sometimes comments get flagged, I try to approve them if they're from regular users (like you guys).

Alex Billington on Apr 2, 2017

14

and I agree in principle. ;D

tarek on Apr 2, 2017

15

Hey Bo. Thanks for the follow up. I know exactly what you mean by finding it hard to suspend your disbelief when actors impersonate famous people. I had the same issue with some preformances. I think this happens because the image projected by the performance doesn't match the one projected by our imagination. This or because we know intrinsically that these personalities are dead, thus inevitably impresonated by actors. Which doesn't help sometimes in suspending our dibelief. For example, Margaret, impersonated by Meryl Streep didn't strike me, even though the acting was AAA.

tarek on Apr 2, 2017

16

Years and years and years ago we were being spammed with Hitler comments, so it was a word I added to the moderation just so I could double check. Your posts were approved (obviously) but that word (and a bunch of others) are still on the flag list. Just keeping the place nice and neat.

Alex Billington on Apr 2, 2017

17

Djimon still looks the same age as GLADIATOR.

DAVIDPD on Apr 1, 2017

18

Unfortunately Alex is guilty of deleting posts of a political nature if they don't agree with his politics.

Payne by name on Apr 1, 2017

19

I guess you didn't see it because the 'offending' posts were removed. Obviously Alex can have what he wants on his site but I just thought it disappointing that he decided to introduce political observation but only left in the comments that supported his political view. Almost like dictatorial censorship, which given his virtue signalled liberalism seemed a little hypocritical.

Payne by name on Apr 2, 2017

20

IDK IDK IDK IDK IDK!!!! I love Ritchie's directing style and there's absolutely nothing out there like it! BUT....Hunnam as the lead bothers me, the amount of CGI vs. what I wish was practical effects (and it's not great looking CGI at that) AND this re-imagining of the Arthur legend with mammoths and crap...is irritating. I was hoping for something a bit more vibrant like the original Excalibur, and all we seem to be getting is a stone-washed alt-hipster version.... I'm really conflicted about seeing this...but I think I'm gonna go with my gut and wait for the cheap theaters/RedBox possibly... /rantend

RAW_D on Apr 2, 2017

21

Rant accepted ( and well deserved) Raw_D. ;D

tarek on Apr 3, 2017

22

Another wasted King Arthur film. Someone talk to Gemmell's estate and get the rights to his two books on the legend and do it right.

Steven Lewis on Apr 4, 2017

Sorry, no commenting is allowed at this time.

FEATURED POSTS

POPULAR COMMENTS

LAST YEAR'S TOP 10

Alex's Top 10 - 2018
1. The Nightingale
2. Vox Lux
3. Into Spider-Verse
4. Shirkers
5. First Man
6. Old Man & Gun
7. M:I - Fallout
8. The Favourite
9. If Beale Street...
10. Blindspotting
Click Here for Thoughts

Adam's Top 10 - 2018
1. Upgrade
2. Annihilation
3. A Star is Born
4. Into Spider-Verse
5. BlacKkKlansman
6. Suspiria
7. Assass. Nation
8. Avengers: Inf. War
9. Bumblebee
10. Bad Times Royale
Click Here for Thoughts

FOLLOW US HERE

Subscribe to our feed or daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main profile on twitter:
For the news posts only, follow this acct:

Add FS to your Feedly updates: click here

ON FACEBOOK / ADS