Why Sony & Marvel's 'Spider-Man: Homecoming' is the Perfect Reboot

July 17, 2017

Spider-Man: Homecoming

Spider-Man finally swung home. Back in February of 2015, I wrote about why Spider-Man swinging back to Marvel Studios would be a good thing for the famed webslinger. Now, two years later, we have Spider-Man: Homecoming, the sixth Spider-Man film that actually feels like the first. The film, which stars Tom Holland as Peter Parker/Spider-Man and Michael Keaton as The Vulture, is exhilarating, extremely well-made and most excitingly of all, refreshing. It shows how you properly reboot a character like Spider-Man, cementing Kevin Fiege and Marvel Studios as creative powerhouses who truly care about these characters. Let's take a look at why Homecoming was the perfect Spidey reboot - and what's in store for him after this.

To understand why Homecoming works so well means investigating why the last couple of movies didn't. That's why over the last few weeks I looked back at the previous six Spider-Man films ranging from Sam Raimi's original Spider-Man from 2002, to its two sequels in 2004 & 2007, and of course Marc Webb's Amazing Spider-Man reboots. Sam Raimi's first two movies are classics of the genre, and they still hold up today. The third film is where things start to go awry, and Marc Webb's films are somewhat of a convoluted mess. There was some hesitancy and concern from fans on why a second Spider-Man reboot in three years was even necessary to begin with. FirstShowing's editor-in-chief, Alex, even expressed some of his hesitancy when Marvel Studios and Sony first struck a deal back in 2015. However, Spider-Man: Homecoming finally gets the Peter Parker character absolutely right.

In a refreshing twist, Marvel Studios and director Jon Watts get Spider-Man right in a way that is totally different than how he's been portrayed in the previous six films. At the same time, Homecoming is still remarkably faithful to the spirit of the character.

It's really telling when, after thirteen moves in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (so far) and six different Spider-Man films, Spider-Man: Homecoming can still feel like a breath of fresh air. Homecoming is actively trying to be a different kind of Spider-Man film, while never really feeling like it is trying too hard to separate itself from the previous incarnations of the character. It doesn't add unneeded mystery or romantic sub-plots. It doesn't make itself feel pointless by setting up future films. It just tries to be a good story first and utmost, which is partly why the last three Spider-Man movies failed. Spider-Man: Homecoming truly succeeds by feeling like a Spider-Man story about what makes Spider-Man great. Spider-Man (as in the character, the superhero) is whimsical yet grounded, youthful yet wise, and overall, simple yet effective.

Spider-Man: Homecoming

That is exactly what Homecoming is able to absolutely nail when the film is at its strongest. A good Spider-Man story takes us back to feeling like a kid again, but still reminds us that growth is necessary. Peter Parker doesn't have to actually be a youth to get this across, but it's the best way if it can be done well. Homecoming does this so fundamentally well. Tom Holland is wonderful as Parker and Spider-Man. He feels so natural in the role, as you genuinely like him right away and can relate to him. Homecoming illustrates and balances those two elements so well. It makes us understand what great power and in result, great responsibility, means without ever having to utter the phrase. We're with Peter the whole movie and we feels what he feels – whether it be the joyful release of getting to suit up as Spider-Man, asking a girl to the homecoming dance – or facing a very deadly, tense, and dire situation against a very real enemy.

Speaking of the devil, there have already been plentiful kudos given to Michael Keaton for his performance as Adrian Toomes and The Vulture. Keaton does a great job in the role, and it helps that Toomes is a fully formed character with real motivations, actions, and perspective. Every time he's on screen, whether it be commanding a scene as Toomes or terrorizing one as The Vulture, he has your full attention. Marvel Studios has been criticized for creating lackluster villains, apart from Loki, in their movie. In The Amazing Spider-Man 2, Jamie Foxx's Electro wanted "to be seen" and Harry Osborn wanted Spider-Man's blood. Not great character work there. In The Amazing Spider-Man, The Lizard just wanted to turn all New Yorkers into… lizards. The Vulture, however, works so intrinsically well because he's not aiming for world domination or to reptilize the human race. At the end of Amazing Spider-Man 2, Electro's actions felt meaningless and the consequences of his actions acted as a mere nuisance for Spider-Man. Besides wanting to "be seen", Electro doesn't have much in way of character development besides his obsession with Spidey. Toomes, on the other hand, is just simply trying to provide a better life for his wife and his daughter, making the stakes real and personal. I'd argue that Keaton's Vulture is one of the best superhero villains in a long time, because his motivations are believable and his actions carry significant thematic weight.

What also separates Homecoming from the pack is how it understands the character of Peter Parker in a different yet completely faithful way than the previous films. Both Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield were great as the superhero character, but Tom Holland brings a naivety and earnestness that ironically grounds Peter in a way we really haven't seen before. It also helps that the film feels like a John Hughes movie, with its primarily high school setting and casting actors who are actually believable as high school students. Homecoming was the first time I actually felt scared for Spider-Man's well being in a live-action film. There's a brilliant scene involving the Washington Monument where Spider-Man actually feels scared. He looks down, and he panics. It's a great moment, and it works so well because it is a genuinely believable moment. Tom Holland's Peter Parker is a kid who makes mistakes, but he learns from them. He acts just like a fifteen year-old kid would, echoing back to some of the greatest Spider-Man stories.

Spider-Man Artwork

There's a great article by Victoria McNally of Polygon that expounds upon this in great detail. In the film, the Vulture has trapped Peter Parker in his warehouse lair by crumbling the cement pylons around him. The Vulture leaves him for dead, thinking he will either give up or die. Here we find Peter Parker at his lowest point. Tony Stark has taken away his high-tech Spider suit, so he's without any of the resources he's had for a majority of the film. He doesn't have the Avengers or Iron Man to help him out. He has to will himself to muster the strength, proving that he's Spider-Man no matter what costume he wears. The moment works so immeasurably well, besides operating in a different context than a very similar moment from the comics, because Peter is earning his status as Spider-Man. He's made mistakes, but he's learning and growing from them. It's the kind of character development we haven't seen from Peter Parker since Spider-Man 2.

I can't wait to see how this version of Spider-Man learns and grows from here. Kevin Feige has mentioned that he intends Spider-Man to have a starring role in Phase 4 of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, which starts with the release of the sequel to Spider-Man: Homecoming (and continues with Thor: Ragnarok). There are so many limitless possibilities, and characters that Marvel can utilize. It goes without saying that Uncle Ben was not mentioned once in Homecoming (besides a passing reference), which added to the movie's refreshing vibe. However, there is an opportunity for Marvel and their filmmakers to work in references as Peter grows throughout the series. Aunt May is also a character that seemed to have somewhat of a minimal role. As the ending seemed to hint, Peter and May's dynamic could enter unexplored territory in the sequel. There's also the character of "MJ", or Michelle, and one hopes characters like Ned and Flash return as well.

Spider-Man: Homecoming

Peter's youthful zeal may lose its appeal over time, but I hope the character stays in high school for as long as possible. There's so many experiences Peter has yet to deal with, such as going to prom (and maybe not leaving the girl, or assisting in having her parent arrested), continuing to disappoint friends or dealing with the complications of leading a double life as a high school student and a superhero. Homecoming only skimmed the surface of what's still possible with this character. We've seen other characters like Norman Osborn or Otto Octavius in these movies, but there are added stakes if they act as true mentors to Peter. Yes, Willem Dafoe's Green Goblin and Alfred Molina's Doc Ock acted in mentor-esque roles, but imagine the heartbreak of being a sixteen year-old kid with no father figure and having your mentor literally turn on you. With Peter as an actual kid, there's so much room to explore stories from different yet exciting avenues.

Which is saying something that despite existing in the cinematic lexicon for the last fifteen years, Spider-Man is just as engaging and entertaining and fresh as ever. Spider-Man's next role in the Marvel Cinematic Universe is a supporting role in the next two Avengers: Infinity War movies. I'm really excited to see what role Spider-Man plays in the "war", and how he's evolved as a superhero from Captain America: Civil War to Homecoming into Infinity War. I think watching this Spider-Man learn and grow over a series of movies will prove to be immensely entertaining and satisfying. Peter Parker will continue to make mistakes, and we will continue to be there opening night to watch him pick himself back up again.

So do you agree with all of this? Is Sony & Marvel's Homecoming the perfect Spidey reboot?

Find more posts: Discuss, Editorial, Marvel



Cracking article and I totally agree with you. I used to enjoy the spidey cartoon series but have been disappointed with all of the films. Too much Mary Jane, too much screaming damsel, too much spectacle for spectacle sake. I found Peter and his friends very likeable and you could see that real effort had been put into making them rounded. The college/high school wasn't an after thought or shallow backdrop for his character - it was the world of his character. You shared the boredom and frustration, the wonder at what he could do and the sacrifices that he had to make. You wanted him to cut loose and hang with his friends but you understood and empathised with his motivation to do more. This didn't feel forced but felt organic. I also agree on Toombs and his portrayal by Keaton. Again he was relatable and his motivations understable. He didn't want to rule the world. Just wanted to provide for his family and he was tired of being the little man swept aside by the bigger, fatter cats. From being wary of it, I have to say that it's the best spidey movie I' ve seen and a welcome return to form for Marvel aftet the dissapointment of Guardians 2.

Payne by name on Jul 17, 2017


"He didn't want to rule the world. Just wanted to provide for his family " That's what would say a criminal anyway to justify his crimes...His family must be a big furnace for money.

tarek on Jul 18, 2017


I think it's.. "That's what a criminal would say to justify his crimes". Consider going back to school ok.

CyraNOSE on Jul 18, 2017


Stand up your colon and I'll listen to you pal. Unless you are suffering from it?

tarek on Jul 18, 2017


Better than ASM but I wasn't impressed that much. Too much Ironman. Too much WTF moments.

tarek on Jul 17, 2017


Well you know that's too bad because that was their whole goal... to impress you! An self appointed internet critic.

CyraNOSE on Jul 18, 2017


Well, they failed miserably. Fortunately they have you! A fanboy troll on dad'd payroll, who's still struggling to find his identity. You know boy, I'll never increase height by putting people down. Trust me.

tarek on Jul 18, 2017


Definitely better than ASM, but it was nothing special. If nothing else, it only worked to make me see how much tired I was from the Marvel formula (TM). Felt very unoriginal. Holland is the worst of the 3 spideys we got (forget about spiderman 3 Toby). Highlight of the movie was Keaton without a doubt, best villain in the MCU in a while (maybe ever). This spiderman works better as a supporting character like in Civil War, imo

Ricardo_PT on Jul 18, 2017


I really enjoyed Homecoming....there's one thing though that bugs me....WHEN did Tony Stark find the time to build the Spider-Man suit?? In Civil War, he meets Peter - whom he found based on his Youtube videos. We know that 24 hours after that meeting, they're already at the airport in Leipzig fighting team Captain and Spidey is wearing the Homecoming suit. So....did Tony build the suit on the plane to Leipzig, or did he build it as soon as he saw those Youtube videos....neither makes much sense. Maybe Tony has access to some time portal where he can spend weeks working on something, but only minutes go by in real life....that suit is so advanced that it makes no sense that he just slapped it together....anyway....comic books....

TheOct8pus on Jul 18, 2017


Doesn't he tell Banner in the Avengers that he has at least three floors of R&D at his HQ. I assumed that he handed the brief for the Spiderman costume to his tech guys and they threw something together.

Payne by name on Jul 18, 2017


This makes sense....still....it feels like they slapped it together pretty fast.... Shit...Honda can't even build an airbag that doesn't explode in your face...

TheOct8pus on Jul 18, 2017


Don't complicate it, he was probably making it before anything we saw. He's got all kinds of things going on.

CyraNOSE on Jul 18, 2017


That's your uncle talking.

tarek on Jul 18, 2017


I know....I'm totally overthinking it. I still enjoyed the movie. The suit's origins are almost irrelevant to the story...

TheOct8pus on Jul 18, 2017


I liked the first guy they had as The Shocker, he was intense!! They shouldn't have killed him off!!

CyraNOSE on Jul 18, 2017

New comments are no longer allowed on this post.



Subscribe to our feed -or- daily newsletter:
Follow Alex's main account on twitter:
For the latest posts only - follow this one:

Add our updates to your Feedly - click here

Get the latest posts sent in Telegram Telegram